#icps23be teaching institute starting now - tweet thread incoming...
First up is Manu Kapur talking about productive failure.
Former college math instructor - noticed students often didn't learn even after very good and clear lectures #icps23be
Instead focus on productive failure - problems carefully designed to activate existing knowledge (e.g. mean, range) but not solvable using those skills. After 40-45 min of working in groups students create creative mathematical solutions - but not "correct" answer #icps23be
This productive failure (followed by instruction) leads to higher conceptual understanding and transfer as compared to direct instruction (followed by problem solving). #icps23be
Implemented a few carefully designed productive failure exercises for college linear algebra course. Increased passing rate from 55% to 75% #icps23be
Huge problem in schooling according to Manu Kapur - unproductive success. Students who succeeded on the given task but don't actually learn anything. Simple problem solving after direct instruction often leads to unproductive success #icps23be
Next up was me - talking about "Best practices for helping students identify misinformation and correct misconceptions". Thanks to my twitter peeps for providing examples of psychology misinfo on TikTok. Look at everyone brainstorming ways to deal with psych misinfo ❤️ #icsp23be
And I conclude that professional orgs like @PsychScience should be actively creating and spreading correct psychology information on social media. @Dr_Inna & @steverathje2 do amazing work but we can't count on ppl doing unpaid and unrewarded labor. #icps23be#CallToAction.
After lunch, @jwpennebaker talking about "Education at scale: Rethinking undergraduate education" Large 500+ student intro psych course. Redesign- lecture first then relevant readings, daily quizzes with feedback covering new and old content #icps23be
Eventually filmed lectures for online course -modeled after late night tv (Jon Stewart) w small studio audience, 5 min segments & interaction among students.
Compared to earlier years ⬆️ attendance bc of quizzes, ⬆️ grades (esp for students w lower parental education) #icps23be
Also improved grades in non-psych courses that semester and all courses the next semester. (Again esp for lower ses). #icps23be
Key features: Power of repeated testing, active engagement of students, transparency (large quiz bank of all past questions)
Can account for >25% of variance in grades by just how often they click on the class content (studying helps!) #icps23be
Final speaker - Bob Uttl "Why student evaluations of teaching are higher education's highway to hell"
How do we measure something as fuzzy and hard to measure as "good teaching"? Common solution - use student evaluations #icps23be
Even if evals correlation with good teaching is .43 (prior meta-analysis) you'll miss 20% of good teachers. But in actuality correlation is 0 once you account for small samples.
Evals are affected by student prior interest in course, type of course (quant/not), size of course (decreases up to 30 then flat), teacher appearance and accent, etc...
None of which are under teacher's control or are indications of the quality of their teaching
How do social systems interface with individual-level beliefs? Symposium at #icps23be
First up, Sharzad Goudarzi discussing the structural antecedents of fairness attitudes. 1/
Psychologists often suggest valuing equity/meritocracy is a moral universal but at different developmental time points, in different situations and in different cultures ppl often stress equality/need. #icps23be 2/
Across 160 countries and multiple decades, they find that increases in neoliberalism systems of government within a country predict increases in individuals belief in meritocracy at later time points.
Equity beliefs are ideologies and shaped by broader systems. #icps23be 3/
Ok, I promised a retrospective thread on our recent cluster hire process - what went well and what I'd do differently next time. Along with tips for other depts hoping to do similar things. LONG 🧵 1/
First, I'm so thrilled with the end result of the search. Our goal was to hire candidates who would help increase our department’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion through their research, teaching, mentoring and/or lived experience. 2/
Our hires @czpuede, @DeonTBenton, @KristaMehari all do just that. They are each outstanding researchers, dedicated teachers and mentors, and their lived experiences provide valuable expertise that was missing in our dept. 3/
Updates from our open-area EDI cluster hire in Vanderbilt's dept of Psych and Human Dev. We had an amazing pool with hundreds of applicants, but we have now narrowed it down to ~15 top applicants whom we have asked for letters of recommendation. Short🧵about our process.
We started by focusing on candidates diversity statements. Since the goal of the search was to improve our dept's commitment to equity, diversity and inclusion we used those statements to make our first cut. Each statement was scored by at least 2 committee members.
Using those scores, we narrowed our list down to 50-60 candidates who showed a deep understanding of EDI issues and history of action. The committee then went through cv's and research statements of those candidates to narrow it down further.
As promised, here's the final syllabus for my Science of Misinformation seminar. It's an undergraduate course for students in the honors college so a broad mix of majors and years (~16 students). 1/
The class focuses on a psych perspective but includes some readings from Political Science, Communication, Comp Sci & Sociology.
This is a big field and it was really hard to narrow down the topics I wanted to focus on. (I also included 2 class choice days for student input) 2/
Following the example of @BrendanNyhan the class will collaboratively design, run and attempt to publish an exp (🙏to my new NSF grant)
Brendan's relevant syllabus- sites.dartmouth.edu/nyhan/courses/
(the exp is from Exp in Politics, but I also used Political Misinfo for some readings) 3/
This is a fascinating paper - but I'd quibble with the conclusion that "incorrect responses to factual questions represent a mix of blind guessing and mistaken inferences" 1/
Along with @cvonbastian, I've been studying what I call "knowledge instability". While we say that ppl "know" or "don't know" factual information (e.g. the capital of Canada), in reality the accessibility of our general knowledge is constantly in flux. 2/
For example, on trivia night, I may be able to remember that the capital of Canada is Ottawa one week, but the following week I incorrectly respond that it is Toronto.
In the current study we use a larger number of repetitions (16), more realistic timing of the repetitions (across two weeks), and more naturalistic exposures (text messages) to better examine how repetition affects belief in real-world settings. 2/
435 participants were texted true and false trivia statements 5x a day across 15 days. On day 16, they rated the truth of statements that they had seen 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16 times. 3/