Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Mar 9 13 tweets 7 min read

An excellent analysis by @joshg99 and @OpenVaet of the missing local PCR tests in the Pfizer "trial".

Just one REALLY important bit of information to add...

There were 207 missing local PCR tests (p<0.0001). @IamBrookJackson @chrismartenson Image
This is the substack that is a must-read.

The 207 number requires just one more step.

It's REALLY important.
Every person who was symptomatic should have had a CENTRAL test and a LOCAL test.

The infamous Pfizer "95% prevention of infection" was a farce. But how did they do it?

The clue was here. It was a marker.
Only the CENTRAL tests were used in the @NEJM paper and the submission to the @US_FDA who approved the drug the very next day.

As if they *knew* what the result of the trial was going to be.
But if the trial was genuine, there should have been no difference in the number of tests sent both to the central lab and to the local lab.

Bear in mind that if you had symptoms your central test was not to be used clinically. Everybody should have had a local test...
But as is typical for people, not everybody does what they should.

However, the vaccine and placebo arms both sent central tests in at the same rate, showing that they didn't behave that differently

(p=non-significant) Image
Yet there was a VERY significant (p=0.000055 probability of happening by chance) difference in the rates of local tests being recorded in the database for the vaccine arm

In fact the vaccine arm reported local tests at a 13.3% lower rate Image
Now you have to take that rate drop and apply it to the ORIGINAL number of participants that reported symptoms AND sent in a central test, to adjust for the less-than-half testing rate.

1558*0.133 ==> 207 vaccine patients missing in the LOCAL testing group

Well, well...
By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial?

162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR positive symptomatic disease. So 154 patients "benefited".

Or did they?
There were up to 207 missing patients in this exact group.
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… Image
Therefore EVERY SINGLE patient who supposedly was saved from "COVID" by the Pfizer vaccine appears to have been accounted for by the number of patients NOT REGISTERED as having a local PCR test, even though the groups were testing centrally at the same rate.
And of course the CENTRAL test results couldn't possibly have been "adjusted" could they?

I mean, Pfizer - who were performing them - didn't have any idea whose sample was whose...

Did they?
And just to confirm that there was in fact almost certainly no difference in infection rates between the groups... if you haven't read this great independent work from @phillyharper it's definitely worth a read (and a subscription).

So.. the question that should be being asked of Pfizer is:

"where are those 207 local PCR test results?"

@AaronSiriSG @BarnesLaw @barnes_law
#taggate #pfizergate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Mar 10
#Gerigate confirms that 55,000 elderly were involuntarily euthanised in care homes in the UK on the orders of @MattHancock and @drlukeevans ....

But there is one other place where we know the elderly died when they shouldn't have.

Victoria, Australia.
Here is the data. In July - August 2020 something happened in Victoria, Australia that DID NOT HAPPEN IN ANY OTHER STATE.


data.nsw.gov.au/search/dataset… Image
How could there be a "second wave" in the state of Victoria and no other state in Australia?

"Lockdowns" didn't stop any other waves - in any case, Victoria followed the CCP model because @DanielAndrewsMP mortgaged the state to the CCP

Read 13 tweets
Mar 9
I sincerely hope #BatBumEddie - who has me blocked - has a good night's sleep. Tomorrow is another day of testimony.

I wonder if anyone, at any point, is going to ask his best buddy #WuhanDom what he had to do with the cover up?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 9
More analysis from @kevin_mckernan showing HUGE amounts of plasmid DNA in the "it's just RNA" gene therapy vaccines.

No worries. There's no such thing as too many cycles remember @takethatct?

@Kevin_McKernan @TakethatCt Lay translation in 1 tweet:
The plasmids that were used to produce the mRNA "vaccine" are made of *DNA* which can integrate into the genome. They are very high level contaminants in the vaccine, at high concentration. This is outside of any legal GMO directive.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 6

Not only was .@healthgovau colluding with Facebook in SINGAPORE to remove private groups of those INJURED by COVID vaccines..

They spent 10 MILLION dollars pushing the failed drugs to avoid scrutiny

Who provided the $10m?
@rennick @SenatorAntic @MRobertsQLD
So the Aus Dept of Health (of which the @TGAgovau is a subsidiary and uses the same colour scheme in documents) lobbied twitter using the partner support portal to have accounts removed that were quoting the TGA's own data.
This is a MASSIVE conflict of interests and raises HUGE concerns about abuse of power in public office.

Twitter accounts were raising legitamate concerns over the TGA's conduct in approving the vaccines and then reporting on the deaths, which they suppressed.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 5
On the 14th Feb 2021 .@drlukeevans promoted propaganda from the @RCObsGyn saying that there was no mechanism to induce infertility

It was a lie and the data showing deposition of LNP in the ovaries was already available to the MHRA

Luke Evans should respond. I have questions.
All this information was available to the government via the @MHRAgovuk at the time that statement was made.

It was not available to the public until the damage was done.

A 15% drop in UK birth rates shows the lie.

The mechanism was known.

Read 6 tweets
Mar 5
.@kevinault my DMs are open so just drop in there if you want to ask me questions.

Better than loitering around a private facebook group run by Pharma for you to push their untested drugs onto pregnant women.

Did ACIP know you were doing this?

And who TF is "Jiffyleaks"?
@kevinault Well it's going to be difficult to drop into my DMs if you blocked me. Oh well, you made your choice.

You'll have to go back to that dodgy Pharma-sponsored private facebook group and ask your buddies there.
Was it something I said?
It was, wasn't it?

If you want to see the interactions between Kevin Ault and me follow the #ACIPKevin hashtag

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!