All this doom mongering about how "difficult" it will be for Ukraine to breach the russian trenches in the South... people need to man up and do some military service before running their mouths like that.
A thread about offensive operations 🧵:
1/36
Yes, breaching a defensive line with an anti-tank ditch out front, a minefield, deep trenches filled with machine guns and ATGM teams is difficult... IF you don't have the right tools.
A trench line is barely an inconvienance for NATO, because of this ⬇️⬇️ 2/n
Ukraine doesn't have air supremacy, but Ukraine is receiving other tools. Like i.e. JDAM ER bombs to plough through those russian trenches.
Here a Taliban compound is flattened by GBU-32 JDAMs (1,000 lb Mk 83 bombs).
Ukraine won't be able to use the JDAM ERs at their max. 3/n
range of 70+ km. JDAM ER are Mk 80 series bombs with added INS/GPS guidance kit (the Joint Direct Attack Munition part) & glide wings (the Extended Range part).
JDAM ER come in 500 lb (GBU-38/ Mk 82) and 2,000 lb (GBU-31/ Mk 84). But Ukrainian fighter jets can't release them 4/n
at great height, due to the risk of russian air defense systems.
However Ukrainian Su-25 fighters have been lobbing unguided S-24/S-25 rockets at the russians from 3 km behind the front, so Ukraine can likely toss JDAM ER bombs at the russians from the same distance. 5/n
Especially if Ukraine saturates that front sector with volleys of AGM-88 HARM missiles and GMLRS rockets to annihilate russian air defense systems.
And two Patriot batteries with PAC-2 GEM+ missiles (range 160+ km) will keep russian fighters away from a Ukrainian offensive. 6/n
Ukraine only has to pierce the russian line in a few points in a 3 km front sector for an offensive.
First and foremost: intensive/detailed reconnaissance!!!!!
• Where do the russians sleep/rest?
• Where are their minefields?
• Which road will russian reinforcements take? 7/n
Chose a front sector that has open terrain (no rivers, no forests) behind it & reconnoiter that sector INTENSIVELY. Then recon some more. And then recon MORE.
Ready?
1) Shell the front sector with every available artillery piece; drive the russian troops into their dugouts. 8/n
2) Hit all dugouts with JDAM ER & GMLRS. Smash all russian troop shelters. Annihilate everything in that front sector. 3) Excalibur all russian armored vehicles in that front sector.
In the image below every dugout behind the trench should get hit by a JDAM or GMLRS. 9/n
4) GMLRS and GLSDB every russian base in the entire South. Smite everywhere russians have based reinforcements. Keep them busy & fixed there. 5) Have 100s of drones up in the air. Yes, Ukraine will lose a lot of them, but it is imperative to spot russian reinforcements 10/n
as soon as possible to hit them with artillery and/or SMArt or Bonus top attack submunitions; or to scatter anti-tank mines into their path: Germany sent AT2 mines, which are deployed with MARS II rockets, while the US sent RAAM mines, which are deployed by 155mm howitzers. 11/n
These mines can be set to self-destruct after 3 or 6 hours (AT2) and 4 hours (RAAM) = enough time to breach the russian line. 6) After the russian trenches have been ploughed through, send your Leopard 2A6s, CV90s, Bradleys, Leopard 2A4, Marder, Challenger 2, etc. forward. 12/n
But have them stop before the minefields (!!), which you hopefully did reconnoiter EXTENSIVELY beforehand.
Every vehicle has to keep an eye out for russian survivors - use the tank's 120mm guns and IFV's autocannons to make sure the russians can't set up ATGMs. 13/n
7) Time to clear the mines: the US sent enough Mine Clearing Line Charge (MICLIC) to Ukraine to clear a path from New York to Philadelphia.
MICLICs are fired by a rocket into a minefield and then detonated to destroy/set off the mines. Afterwards a armored engineer vehicle 14/n
with a mine plough clears a path through the blasted area to ensure no mines remains.
Here a US Army M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle fires a MICLIC, detonates it, then ploughs through the scorched earth. MICLIC's are ~107m long (350 feet) and contain about 1,800 lb of C-4. 15/n
If the minefield is deeper - repeat until a path is blasted/cleared through it. The US sent MICLIC, Finland is sending three Leopard 2 based mine ploughs and Germany 42 Wisent 1 mine-clearing vehicles based on the Leopard 1. 16/n
8) When you reach the anti-tank ditch - fill it in. Germany and Italy are sending Dachs armored engineer vehicles to do that.
9) Once combat engineers have cleared paths through the russian fortifications - the offensive truly gets underway: tanks, IFVs, APCs, all move 17/n
through the breach & advance into the enemy's rear. 10) In parallel infantry moves up to clear the trench line in the breach sector of any remaining russians.
Ideally 8-10 paths have been cleared in a 3 km wide sector of the front & Ukrainian columns now pour through them. 18/n
It's time to throw the russians in disarray like during the Kharkiv offensive. The more columns and the faster they move reduces the russians' ability to counterattack. And again: drones, drones, drones. Send them all in!
Look for the russians, find them, hit them. 19/n
PzH 2000, AS-90, AHS Krab, M109A6 Paladin, Zuzana 2, M142 HIMARS, M270 MRLS, & whatever Soviet-era self-propelled armored artillery remains use it all to hit russian forces the moment they are spotted.
Nothing demoralizes as much as getting hit by artillery 5 minutes after 20/n
arriving in a place, where you're supposed to set up a defensive position.
And use all your Excalibur rounds with the Swedish Archers!
Archers set Excalibur fuzes automatically in 0.2 seconds and can fire them 10 km further than M777 and M109A6. And Archer has the highest 21/n
rate of fire.
While tanks and IFVs, AMX-10 RC, and other armored fighting vehicles seek out enemy formations and destroy them, have infantry in Strykers and MRAPs follow to secure the rear, eliminate russian stragglers, handle POWs, and secure the supply lines. 22/n
And bring in those supplies ASAP!
You want to win? You have to fuel your armor!
A steady stream of supplies, secured by a lot of Ukrainian troops in the rear are essential (!) to keep the offensive going. If your rear isn't secured... your troops are gonna get bogged down 23/n
without supplies like the russians a year ago around Kyiv.
And where should Ukraine attack? Thanks to @bradyafr's excellent work, we know where the russians expect Ukraine to attack. He mapped all russian fortifications (in red). Ukraine's main objectives in the South are: 24/n
Melitopol and Mariupol. Secondary objectives are the Perekop Isthmus to cut off a russian retreat to Crimea and a pincer into the rear of Donetsk (purple Pentagons).
So how would I attack? Depends on the available forces... with nine mechanized brigades, three artillery
25/n
brigades, two engineer brigades & follow on forces to secure the rear, I would attack, break through & pursue three directions: 1) South to Mariupol 2) West to Bilmak in the rear of the russian front to panic the russian troops there 3) East to Amvrosiivka to make holding 26/n
Donetsk city impossible for the russians.
Once these objectives are secured I would pursue limited attacks in the East to secure the border with russia and encircle Donetsk from three sides, while throwing most forces into a push towards Berdyansk & Tokmak. 27/n
From the Berdyansk spit GLSDB can reach and destroy the Kerch bridge, while once Tokmak is reached all those "difficult to take" russian trench lines are cut off and the russian troops will panic and abandon them.
Last but not least a push to liberate Melitopol. 28/n
This offensive would remain under the cover of Patriot (blue) and GLSDB (green), with GMLRS (orange), Archer (purple) and other artillery moving with the attacking units to provide fire support.
And russian positions that don't surrender would be JDAMed out of existence.
29/n
As cherry on top I would love for Ukrainian troops to cross the Dnipro at Kherson & occupy the Perekop Isthmus to bag all the russian forces in the South; and for Ukrainian troops to advance to Alchevsk and secure a panicked russian retreat from most of Donetsk Oblast. 30/n
Alas I believe for this operation Ukraine doesn't have the needed materiel... which is the fault of the West, what still provides only limited support.
If we want Ukraine to win, then more of everything is needed. The more we give them, the sooner this war will be over and
31/n
the fewer people will die. So a 1,000 JDAM ER please! Another 10,000 Excalibur rounds please. 500,000 155mm shells ASAP please. And send more COBRA and MAMBA artillery radars!
While waiting for the engineering units to breach the russian frontline Ukrainian forces are at 32/n
risk of russian artillery strikes & loitering munitions. For the latter Ukraine received a good amount of Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft guns, but to counter artillery, not just howitzers, but also counter battery radars are needed. Here the West needs to deliver more! 33/n
Less than two months remain to provide Ukraine with the tools needed to breach the russian lines, liberate the South, and decisively defeat fascist russia - and provide the tools in ENOUGH numbers.
I.e. the US realized that the Biber armored bridge layers donated by Germany 34/n
can't support Leopard 2 tanks, so the US sends M60 Armored Vehicle Launched Bridges. Great! But send 50+. If Ukraine receives too few it will slow down the offensive and allow the russians to regroup.
That applies to everything: from fuel to ammo to food to drones etc. etc. 35/n
And Ukraine must win! All else will lead to disaster. So send everything from everyone all at once!
Lend/Lease it if you must. But don't hesitate. Too much of everything secures victory!
36/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To give you an idea, why European militaries prefer US-made weapons to European-made weapons:
Europe militaries urgently need a ground launched cruise missile capability... the US already had such a (nuclear) capability in 1983, then dismantled all of its BGM-109G Gryphon
1/10
ground launched cruise missiles after signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
russia of course broke this treaty after putin came to power and after 15 years of ignoring russia lying about it Trump finally ordered to withdraw from the treaty in August 2019.
2/n
Just 16 days after withdrawing from the treaty the US Army began to test launch Tomahawk cruise missiles form land (pic) and in June 2023 (less than 4 years later) the US Army formed the first battery equipped with the Typhon missile system.
And as Raytheon has a production 3/n
These are the 🇬🇧 UK's HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers.
First, as you can see in this picture, only one actually carries aircraft. The UK barely had enough money to buy the F-35B for one. For the other the Blairites expected the US Marine Corps 1/9
to provide the required aircraft, because the two carriers were bought so the Royal Navy could fight alongside the US Navy against China in the Pacific.
But the US does NOT want the British carriers anywhere near its carrier strike groups, because the UK carriers would slow
2/9
down a US carrier strike groups, as the UK did not have the money for nuclear propulsion.
And as the UK doesn't have the money for the ships that make up a carrier strike group (destroyers, frigates, submarines) the UK expected the US Navy to detach some of its destroyers and 3/9
🇬🇧 decline: Only one SSN is operational, three are no longer fit for service and got no crews. One carrier has no air wing and has been sent to rust away. The other carrier only has an air wing when the RAF cedes a third of its fighters. Only 1 destroyer is operational. The
1/5
frigates are falling apart. New Type 31 frigates won't get Mark 41 VLS or bow Sonar. The RAF took 48 of its Eurofighters apart, because it got no money for spares. The army has just 14 155mm howitzers. The Ajax vehicle is injuring the troops it carries. The Warrior IFVs are
2/5
outdated and falling apart. They amphibious ships are not deployable / crewed for lack of funds. The UK has not anti-ballistic missile system (e.g.Patriot). There is only money for 12 F-35A, the smallest F-35A order on the planet. The tank force is at its smallest since 1938.
3/5
International Law is worthless paper if you cannot and will not back it up with military power.
Dictators do not care for international law. But they fear the US Air Force. The moment the US signaled it would no longer back "international law" putin annexed Crimea and Assad
1/10
gassed his people. International Law is what defence laggards hide behind to not have to spend for their own security (hoping the US will save them from their irresponsibility) .
European politicians like to grandstand about "international law" but NO European nation has the
2/n
the means (nor the will) to the enforce it. European politicians grandstanding about international law always do so in the belief that the US will enforce their balderdash.
So European politicians lecturing the US about "international law" now are utter morons, because they
3/n
All this "NATO is unprepared for the use of drones like the war in Ukraine" is ridiculous, because:
• of course NATO is unprepared for the use of drones like the war IN (!) Ukraine,
• because that is not how a NATO-russia war will be fought. NATO, even just European NATO,
1/4
fields: 244 F-35, 403 Eurofighter, 183 Rafale, 177 modern F-16, 3 Gripen E, and 896 older fighter types.
A total of 1,906+ fighters (without the US Air Force and Royal Canadian Air Force; and with more new fighters entering European service every week).
russia, when counting
2/4
generously can't even put half that fighter strength into the field, and the 1,010 modern European NATO fighters would devastate russia's fighter force.
With NATO air supremacy comes absolute dominance of the battlefield. Every russian moving near the front would get bombed
3/4
Gripen fans keep hyping the Gripen with fake claims & as long as they do, I will counter them:
Scandinavian Air Force officer about the Gripen E: It can either be fully fueled or fully armed or flown from short runways. Never can 2 of these things be done at the same time.
1/25
The Gripen fans keep claiming that the Gripen has a better range than the F-35 and can fly from short runways... then admit that its max. range can only be achieved with external fuel tanks, which weigh so much that the Gripen E can no longer fly from short runways.
2/n
External fuel tanks also mean: the Gripen becomes slower, the radar cross section increases (making detection more likely), the fuel consumption increases,... and even with all 3 external fuel tanks the Gripen E carries 1,340 kg less fuel than the F-35A carries internally.
3/n