To “defend” trans care is always to further prop up what is already an extremely privileged and gatekept system that keeps countless trans people from access—they’re going to say we’re evil no matter how it actually works so why not fight for something that’s actually liberatory?
Instead of arguing just trans kids have access to blockers to avoid traumatic puberty, we say all kids should be on blockers until they’re “sure” they’re cis or trans. Or we just let trans kids go through the puberty they want at the same time as their peers.
Instead of defending trans care as a “parents choice”, we admit parents who deny their kids access to care are committing abuse, and that the Family is the biggest site for the harm of queer / trans kids. There’s a reason there are so many countless houseless queer / trans youth!
Instead of defending gender affirming surgeries for their long gatekeeping processes, we make them as accessible as any other type of surgery. We demand bodily autonomy in all things for all people cis and trans, and stop submitting to the paternalistic logic of the clinic.
The frame of what we see as possible is always being set by people who want us to disappear entirely, so we argue for the preservation of the oppressive systems we already have. We are taught to treat the most limited horizons as our salvation, instead of the expanses we deserve.
We must not let the many rich questions of trans life and futures be set by “just asking questions” sycophants and straightforward fascists—regardless of their identities or institutional positions, we owe them nothing. Trans liberation now!
None of this is new / special and ppl way smarter than me (@gp_jls, first and foremost!!) have been already, but so many of us are still caught up defending the logics of systems meant to administrate our lives instead of giving us meaningful access to our own futures. Stop it 🤗
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Love when a prominent transmasc journalist defends Chappelle as “brilliant and radical” and “next-level trans accepting”. I wonder why it is they find humor that’s mostly based around disgust and fetishization of trans women so radical? 🤨
Baeddels - a small group of separatist transfems who reclaimed ye olde transmisogynistic slur but have barely had a real presence in a decade—now taken up as a thing for a group of people to dismiss any trans woman who talks about transmisogyny by transmascs as hateful radicals.
According to this definition, any transfem who talks about the fact transmascs (alongside all other transmisogyny exempt ppl) benefit from transmisogyny, you are a Baeddel! So basically for them, any transfem that understands how transmisogyny actually works is a Baeddel 🤔
Idk, using a weird old transmisogynistic slur to dismiss any transfem who talks about the specific intersection of oppression only we face seems pretty transmisogynistic!! 🤷♀️
I’ve never met a trans person who doesn’t like people just because they have quote in quote “detransitioned”—we just don’t like the handful that loudly align themselves with movements that hate us to try to deny us the care they got to consensually access.
I strongly believe it is much more horrific for someone to non-consensually go through the wrong puberty than to consensually choose to—it is actually good to have a society where people have bodily autonomy and to be able to make choices they could regret.
By associating all people who “detransition” with the handful of folks who make themselves mascots for the transphobic hate movement, you are actually the one who is being “detransphobic”! Most who “detransition” in some way are still in trans community and/or still trans!