I haven't been on twitter long enough to know if Joseph's story gets rehashed as much a Bathsheba's, but it's another one that spotlights the assumptions about consent/abuse brought to the text.

Thinking about this in wakeful hours, thanks DST, so a 🧵& invite to conversation
Joseph's rejection of Potiphar's wife is most often preached as example of young man "fleeing temptation." Is that what's going on? Does text indicate Joesph himself desires Potiphar's wife in some way? What do you think?
Joseph declares Potiphar's wife's coercion attempts to be undesirable, a betrayal of Potiphar's trust, wicked, & a sin against God. Naming this merely "a temptation" assumes instead that young men are tempted by any sexual opportunity.
Some things we know: Joseph was enslaved around age 17, served in Potiphar's household, gets thrown into prison & released at age 30. We don't know how long he's in prison, but apocryphal literature says 12 years.
He's likely late teens when he's a slave in Potiphar's household & Potiphar's wife decides she wants him sexually. While Joseph would've been considered a man by ANE standards, my point here is we read (& preach) teenage boy + married woman and think "temptation not assault"
This is a low view of young men & an ignorant view of the dynamics of sexual abuse against young men.

I appreciate how this important 🧵from @KyleJamesHoward spotlights the destructive nature of our assumptions & misconceptions about women abusing boys.
Additionally, we ignore the ways Potiphar's wife lies to get ahead of the narrative. "He tried to sleep with me," she says. "He grabbed me. I screamed." It's interesting that her lie says Joseph intended to "make sport of me" when that's exactly what she's been doing.
This vs. reveals common tactics still used by abusers who hold power over their victims: DARVO, get ahead of the narrative, projection, blame the victim...lies.

Some point to this text as a foil for #metoo & to suggest the real danger here is false allegations.
Ofc false allegations occur, but it's anachronistic to imagine that Potiphar's wife is believed in the ANE b/c she is a woman, rather than b/c of her status as Potiphar's wife, a title that also underscores that ANE women are known primarily by belonging to husbands/fathers.
Suggesting this is about false allegations, like saying this is about resisting temptation, is forcing the text to say something other than it's plain reading: an accounting of the afflictions & injustices Joseph endured, as explained by Joseph himself in Gen 50:20
Sometimes ppl also point to Joseph as example of what Bathsheba should've done. She should have gone to prison or died rather than "give in!" Look at Joseph!

This imagines that Joseph or Bathsheba, or any victim of assault/abuse, as an A-or-B choice, that they have any agency.
Joseph wasn't offered prison. He was repeatedly coerced, strategically targeted (she isolates him) by his powerful master's wife, assaulted, and then he ran.

It just so happens that, as a well-built man, he was physically able to escape his assailant...& then was imprisoned.
I've heard this passage preached as it's often depicted in sacred art, as if Joseph was desirous of Potiphar's wife, so close to succumbing, & fled at the last minute.

That's a possibility, but there are no textual or literary details that indicate anything like mutual desire
I suggest that's a result of our fantasy-saturated culture, but maybe others have ideas about why we prefer that reading? I wonder if it's easier for us to reckon w/a trope of women-as-seductress rather than name the painful vulnerability of male victims of assault/abuse?
Also, even if Joseph did experience desire, categorizing that solely as "temptation" w/out discussion of coercion ignores the painful & confusing reality named by many abuse victims - the shame & betrayal they feel by the body's response to unwanted advances.
I think we do Joseph & every abuse survivor a disservice to ignore the coercion & assault.

In Acts 7, Stephen says that God delivered Joseph from all his afflictions; I think this is one of them.

Anyway, curious to know how others see this. What do you think? /End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alethia (Marissa)

Alethia (Marissa) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlethiaWrites

Mar 12
🧵This is a great point.

I'm a novelist, & when you write a story you construct setting, characterization, plot, etc. to show-not-tell your point. The biblical authors are master storytellers. They are not spinning made-up tales, but they are making story-telling choices.
Plenty of ppl have stated the excellent textual arguments for an interpretation that David raped Bathsheba, but I'd like to spotlight some literary ones, b/c I think it's a stretch from a story-telling perspective to read 2 Sam & land at "consensual."
A few things that strike me about the author's choices in how to tell this account: the story opens with the author spotlighting David's destructive path: he's abandoned his kingly duties, he's not leading his army, he's up late at night prowling. He is in moral decline.
Read 27 tweets
Mar 10
This is a thought provoking🧵. It’s interesting to me that even in our common vocab (my/our children or “do you *have* children) we don’t have many options to name their separate personhood.

Ofc there’s a good, lovely & true sense of belonging in “my/our” lang too…
…but the lack of ways to speak about children in other ways besides primarily as extensions of ourselves (parents) is striking.

Maybe the posture behind the “my” language is key.
“This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased” is diff than “This is my child to do with as I will.”

“This person has been entrusted to me & my care” is different than “I can do with this person as I please”
Read 4 tweets
Mar 8
🧵I've been learning & writing about allegations of misuse of power & abuse response mishandling w/in @The_ACNA since 2021 when @ladyjessicahaze 1st tweet dropped. I believe ppl under our care deserve clear communication, trustworthy leadership, attentive responses & safe shelter
From 7/21 on I've had many conversations w/leaders & have been told to trust the process, that all will become clear, that procedures must be followed, etc. My trajectory went from optimistic to determined to injured to dismayed as "process" concluded only to now be met w/silence
Last yr, when the three PRT volunteers-women with impressive credentials & expertise-resigned, this set off 🚨 for me (as it should for everyone in ACNA), added to by fact that prov team did not care to take their concerns seriously or respond w/integrity
Read 18 tweets
Mar 7
Oh, dear. “Ahasuerus falls in love with and marries Esther, not knowing her ethnicity.” No. This is not a love story in any shape or form, it’s trafficking as this excellent 🧵details.
Also God isn’t named in the book of Esther b/c Esther “lied & married a Gentile?” 😬 🫠 I wasn’t paying much attention to @TGC before, but I for sure am now. Is no exegetical study being done before an account with 200k followers hits “publish”?
One of the most brilliant literary devices in Esther (IMO) is how the author continually shows Ahasuerus as a foolish ruler who cannot control his anger & contrasts this with Esther’s intelligence & action to save, part of the topsy turvy themes of the book.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 6
🧵Vision Forum taught same kind of ideology, re: men & women & marriage that Josh Butler's forthcoming (AFAIK) book Beautiful Union does. It is 🚨 that Doug Phillips, a man w/credible allegations of sexually abusing a minor & abuse of power (lawsuit settled) retains any influence
The other day I learned theological diff b/w "new Calvinists" & "neo-Calvinists." (see🧵⬇️) I hadn't been aware, b/c for many of these men-Doug Phillips, Doug Wilson, Mark Driscoll-their redefinition of "reformed" isn't as much about systematic theology
...but about shared application. It makes for strange bedfellows who align for culture war or "anti-woke" purposes. For many, a primary overlap is their family life teaching, which includes hard complementarianism & hierarchical family life.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 6
This analysis is excellent from @scotmcknight: “I’ll put it in terms of our recent book – it’s Babylon, it’s Rome, it’s about authority, it’s about power, and in the end, folks, say it: it’s about domination.”
“…which makes those inside the complementarian group, TGC though not limited to TGC, complicit in forming & nurturing a culture in which male penetration of a female as an image of Christ’s relationship to the church was acceptable, even orthodox & traditional.” @scotmcknight
“I’m not sure what they are sorry for with respect to the content of the excerpt they published, or the book’s contents. TGC, at least it appears to me, has apologized for posting the excerpt, not for its contents.” @scotmcknight
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(