Credit to Prof @jeanseaton1 for finding this quote from BBC Director General Sir Hugh Greene in 1965, about limits of BBC impartiality #Lineker:
"Although, in the day-to-day issues of public life, the BBC does try to attain the highest standards of impartiality...
....there are some respects in which it is not neutral, unbiased or impartial. That is, where there are clashes for and against the basic moral values--truth~lness, justice, freedom, compassion, tolerance....
....Nor do I believe that we should be impartial about certain things like racialism or extreme forms of political belief. Being too good "democrats" in these matters could open the way to the destruction of democracy itself" Ends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Bashir’s deception was shocking. There was no public interest in his forgery, it was a blatant breach of BBC guidelines and of basic journalistic ethics more generally.
2. Senior management’s response and subsequent cover up was even worse. It appears that BBC governors were not given details of the internal inquiry. See this excellent blog by @StewartPurvis for more detail on management failure: profpurvis.com
3. Once the BBC realised its errors, it announced an independent judge-led inquiry, whose report was made public. It has acknowledged its bad behaviour and apologised unreservedly for the distress caused to the Royal Family.
This piece by @juliakhorowitz is a first rate analysis of why impartiality matters - and why last week's mob invasion in Washington had its roots in Reagan's abolition of the US equivalent in 1987: edition.cnn.com/2021/01/16/med…
That move enabled Murdoch to launch Fox News. And this was James Murdoch's analysis just 2 days ago: "Those outlets that propagate lies to their audience have unleashed insidious and uncontrollable forces that will be with us for years."