On March 10th, the Ukrainian General staff reported Russian drones dropping K-51 chloropicrin grenades. There have been many reports of these grenades being used over the past few months, maybe once per month.
"Російські окупанти здійснили скидання аерозольних гранат нелетальної дії типу К-51 в районі Сєверного, Водяного і Невельського."
These grenades are typically used for riot control, but could point to a willingness to use more deadly chemical weapons in the future. The attached image is for illustrative purposes only.
The Avdiivka area has been heavily shelled and bombed by aviation. The shelling and bombing are moving into the smaller towns and villages and away from the city of Avdiivka itself.
Settlements getting hit include Tonenke, Lastochkyne, Orlivka, Semenivka, and Berdychi (marked white). They are also heavily shelling the roads between these towns and the highways that lead to them.
In addition, they are heavily shelling the Avdiivka Coke Plant and the more general industrial area in the north of the city (marked yellow).
Russia has deployed precision guide bombs called UPAB-1500, similar to the JDAMs recently given to Ukraine. These bombs contain 1010kg warheads, have a range of 50km, and are very accurate.
However, one of these bombs failed and landed in Donetsk recently.
Russia has few of these bombs and used them sparingly over the past year.
North of Avdiivka, during the past week, Russia has captured Vesele (1) and Krasnohorivka (2) and is now assaulting Kamyanka (3). As a result, control of Kamyanka is contested, and now that it is flanked and attacked from the north, it will likely fall—perhaps tonight or tomorrow
The southern part of Avdiivka around Sjeverne, Pervomaiske, and Nevelske are all relatively stable.
I do not have news about the area around Marinka, either. There is ongoing fighting in the city and assaults towards Podjeda and Novomykhailivka. Novomykhailivka suffered significant artillery bombardment before a Russian assault several days ago, but the assault failed.
Part 2: Bakhmut
North of Bakhmut, Russians have been making slow but steady progress. They are moving down the E40 highway, which leads north to Slovyansk.
They have captured the highlands south of this highway and north of Orikhovo-Vasylivka. This town is nestled in a valley, as pictured.
This town is likely contested, but it is concerning Russia was able to move through the highlands north of this town so rapidly. They are also getting closer to Minkivka, part of a small agglomeration of settlements that straddle the E40 highway.
Southeast of here, Russia recently captured Dubovo Vasylivka, and they are attacking Hryhorivka and Bohdanivka. However, attacks toward these two towns have all failed.
A bit further south, closer to Bakhmut, Russia is attacking the town of Khromove again without success. But the pressure on this town is intense, and Ukraine must hold it because it shields the supply roads into Bakhmut.
As a result, Ukraine can no longer use main roads, instead relying on farm roads. Unfortunately, these roads are deteriorating from the passage of heavy machinery and the spring mud.
Russia is attacking the northern industrial area of Bakhmut. They have entered this area, but their assaults have been either destroyed or forced to withdraw.
The Bakhmutivka River primarily shields the eastern side of Bakhmut.
The southern side of Bakhmut has had significant fighting and the most movement in the past few days. Russians are steadily moving north through Sadova St and Gogol Street.
This southern portion is the most dynamic area of the Bakhmut defense. It is difficult to analyze what is happening, as Russian and Ukrainian forces constantly move and attack here.
West of Bakhmut, Russia is attacking Ivanivske, toward the T0504 highway, and west in the general direction of Stupochky. The attacks on Ivanivske and the highway have all failed.
The push west across the canal toward Stupochky has yet to determine results. Russia may control the area around the ?? marker.
Generally speaking, the situation around Bakhmut is terrible and deteriorating. Losing the city is disappointing, especially given the resources available for its defense, but it isn’t the end of the world.
However, Ukraine’s constant desire to throw more men into the problem has a real chance to backfire. It is long past time for Ukraine to cut its losses and pull back to a different defensive line.
As fighting intensifies, opportunities to pull out become fewer and increasingly dangerous. Especially when combined with bad weather and deteriorating roads.
There will be a point, and we could already be there, where withdrawal is no longer a reasonable option, and fighting will continue, waiting for a lull in combat.
It will take months for Ukraine to prepare a significant counterattack. It requires substantial training, planning, and preparation. I don’t think Bakhmut can last months.
Furthermore, preparing for a counterattack itself requires a lull in combat, a period where Russia is forced, for whatever reason, to slow its pace of assaults. The break intensity will allow Ukraine to train its forces and prepare for its attack.
We witnessed this last summer leading up to Ukraine’s major offensives in the autumn.
Russia will likely continue its current pressure level for the next 2-3 months, at which point Ukraine could begin preparing for its attack, which could come in 5-7 months—late summer to autumn, in other words.
Can the defense of Bakhmut last that long? I strongly doubt it. It is possible, but I doubt it. And even if Ukraine can defend that long, at what costs? Would it even be worth it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I see several things happening in Ukraine right now:
1: Ukraine has pivoted to a drone based defense. Most of the gains you see Russia making right now are coming as a result of one of two things. A: Inferior Ukrainian drone units or B: Overwhelming Numerical Superiority.
When I say an inferior drone unit, I do not mean the pilots are bad, or even necessarily that their construction is bad. It could be as simple as not having access to enough drones, or not having enough pilots. I simply mean the unit isn’t strong enough for the task.
Where we see the strongest drone units, we see Russia struggling to advance, Usually only advancing with extreme numerical superiority and enormous casualties.
First, the total losses by category. You see significantly more losses for Russia than for Ukraine. This is the first month where Rubicon played a significant part of the Ukrainian losses.
Roughly 17% of Ukraine's losses in the month of February were from Rubicon (328 out of 1965). Primarily in Kursk.
Here you can see Tank, Infantry Fighting Vehicle, Armored Personnel Carrier, and MRAP losses by day through the month. Note that Russia uses few MRAPs.
While Trump’s team spreads defeatism and tries to blackmail Ukraine into surrender, Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield remain unimpressed by the proclamations coming out of Washington Oblast.
Their actions speak louder than words.
In recent days, Ukraine has:
Recaptured Kotlyne
Liberated Pischane
Pushed into Shevchenko
These gains prove two critical points.
🔹 First: Ukraine still has the ability to seize the initiative.
Despite immense challenges, its military can concentrate forces, execute counterattacks, and maintain operational momentum—suggesting it retains significant reserves.
If the West falters, Ukraine can continue fighting until Russia collapses. Slowly trading land against Russian offensive potentials.
If the West finds its backbone, Ukraine can decisively defeat Russia and end the war on just terms.
Europe could have invested 1-2 hundred billion dollars over the past 3 years, but instead they will have to invest 3-5 trillion over the next 20. I’ve talked about this many times in the past. The politicians made very unwise decisions because they were afraid.
Should have gone 100% all in on making Ukraine win from day 1. Full on everything. It would have fixed every problem. Countries still aren’t even doing this. Every single day you delay will cost you 100 or 1000 times more over the next few years.
You thought it cost too much to squeeze 20-30 billion dollars into your budget for 5 years. Imagine having to fit in 500 billion.
There is absolutely no reason for Ukraine to negotiate with Russia, at all, for any reason, in the year 2025. Any negotiations should start in mid 2026, when the Russian economy has imploded, their deficits are blasting off to the moon, and Russia can no longer fight.
Every country should be looking at the situation like this: we only have to get ukraine through the next 12-18 months. We need to throw in the money, weapons, and ammo available now to make this happen. This is not a forever war. There is 1 year left. We are 75% done.
Russia will have absolutely no ability to wage war in the year 2027. Zero ability. Bringing the war into 2027 should be the threat to Russia. If we supply Ukraine through to that time period, Russia risks absolute implosion.