Libertarians seeking bailouts are *not* hypocritical. A short 🧵
Libertarians advocate for “economic freedom.” Wealth should be allowed to beget more wealth, free of societal constraints. And of course wealth provides power 💥, which in turn then begets wealth and power, and on and on. 2/11
The 1971 “Powell Memo” provided ideological fuel for libertarians, encouraging business leaders to treat society and democracy as malleable. The powerful could and should bend society itself to allow the exponential compounding of power. Lobbying $ skyrocketed 📈
3/11
The essence of libertarianism isn’t “no government intervention.” Its overriding principle is to allow the powerful to compound more power, unchecked by societal constraints. Nothing hypocritical then about using the levers of power to privatize gains and socialize risk! 🤷♂️
4/11
My pinned tweet video provides a thorough dismantling of libertarianism. (I was schooled in this stuff; it took me years to see the light.) 5/11
Debunking Economic Myths in Service of Democracy (FULL VIDEO)
⚠️ #SVB appears to be a case where the moral hazard will be absorbed by banks via a fund set aside for this scenario, rather than taxpayers directly.
6/11
(Narrator: Yeah, I know, paid for by our banking fees as consumers.)
Gifted wapo:
“Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said that taxpayers would bear none of the burden of protecting depositors. Their funds will be backstopped by a pool of money that is regularly paid into by U.S. banks, which now holds more than $100 billion.” 7/11
Do I wish the regulations had remained in place (which Trmp repealed) that would have avoided this? Of course. Sometimes libertarians can be their own worst enemy, as the #SVB situation highlights. And regular people get caught in the crossfire. 8/11
What should happen to the companies who did nothing worse than deposit money in a bank? wapo:
9/11
“I didn’t make risky bets. I wasn’t doing anything illegal… We just put our money in a bank account and now, our business is a precarious position for it.”
There will be a lot of finger pointing at the Biden administration. But anti-libertarians (Democrats) aren’t to blame here. And this won’t use our taxes or grow the debt. Will VCs and banks hold each other accountable? I wish.
10/11
In sum, this seems like yet another situation (like #NorfolkSouthern) where regulations were removed that could have avoided harm (NS case: ECB brakes). Lobbied for by libertarians who wanted to socialize risk. That isn’t hypocrisy. It’s the whole game. 11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anyone else tired of this highway to dystopia? Here’s the deal:
Tech scales. Looking back, you know what we scaled? Advertising.
Synonym for advertising? Manipulation.
Thought it was sneaker companies and your benign democratic leaders that had your data? 1/🧵
Well, yeah, but also billionaires and Putin and MBS.
And now AI will push even more drivel and deep fakes and phishing and disinfo at us. Hmmm… 2/
How about if instead we move from a PUSH Internet (bombarding us with whatever garbage) to a PULL Internet (curating a safe and prosocial experience… that scales). 3/
I’m not done reading Resisting AI by Dan McQuillan but already must recommend it. Here’s just one passage:
“[Narxcare] trawls medical and other records to assign patients an Overdose Risk Score. One classic failing of the system has been misinterpreting medication…” 1/4
that people had obtained for sick pets; dogs with medical problems are often prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines, and these veterinary prescriptions are made out in the owner’s name. As a result, people with a well-founded need for opioid painkillers for…” 2/4
serious conditions like endometriosis have been denied medication by hospitals and by their own doctors. The problems with these systems go even deeper; past experience of sexual abuse has been used as a predictor of likelihood to become addicted to medication,” 3/4
Imagine a society without any institutions. It’s not even a society at that point, really… no family structures, no schools, no police, no stores. It’s total disorder, breeding chaos, violence, and every man for himself.
Now imagine a system with absolute order. Everything is predictable with total conformity. This is an unnatural state, which can only be maintained by tyrants and their henchmen. North Korea comes to mind.
per @TimothyDSnyder
"systematic seizure of Ukrainian women and children and their deportation into the vastness of Russia...some three million people have been deported, disproportionately young women and children. At least two hundred thousand and as many as 700,000 children."
I’ve quoted this in the past and told it was hyperbole. Scroll up. Still think so? The party that holds the US House gives (and receives!) aid and comfort to/from that regime. 3/6
Watching the UK🇬🇧 self-immolate❤️🔥, first with Brexit and now the disastrous libertarian economic policies of Liz Truss, it’s time to debunk the Scarcity Myth. 1/🧵 #ScarcityMyth
If you’re catching up on the UK, read this @jaredbrock post.
“Churches and pubs are applying for grants to become ‘warm spaces’ just to keep the nation alive this winter. No one else can afford to turn their heat on.” #ScarcityMyth 2/ survivingtomorrow.org/britain-is-try…
Of all the economic myths (my pinned tweet video debunks 8 of them), the #ScarcityMyth is the most pernicious because it creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. If we believe in it and act upon it, we are *guaranteed* scarcity. 3/