Of all the people who have blocked me, this was perhaps the most apparent (this and the Hillel Neuer block).
@Aizenberg55 engages in selective information with the veneer of it being "authentic". He rose to "fame" with his 303 errors found in the @HRW apartheid report..
@Aizenberg55 engages in selective information with the veneer of it being "authentic". He rose to "fame" with his 303 errors found in the @HRW apartheid report..
that was hosted by NGO Monitor, an extended arm of the Israeli state, whose goal is to discredit #NGOs working in solidarity with #Palestinians or who are actual #Palestinian NGOs.
So Aizenberg decided going for the block after being exposed or having been fed the parts that he was omitting. In many cases he was posting clearly deceiving information or was not able to respond to specific questions.
This behaviour is of course not trustworthy and
This behaviour is of course not trustworthy and
puts this whole report about the 303 errors in the HRW apartheid report in question.
Is someone who gets the basic info wrong on twitter, to be trusted with a major report? Luckily, I am going through his report as well, albeit very slowly because I do have other engagements.
Is someone who gets the basic info wrong on twitter, to be trusted with a major report? Luckily, I am going through his report as well, albeit very slowly because I do have other engagements.
However., it is important to show the deceitfulness of their reporting, this "veneer" or authenticity, that because it comes from NGO monitor, it has to be "properly made".
This is clearly bullshit and your block of me Aizenberg clearly showed you have no leg to stand on.
This is clearly bullshit and your block of me Aizenberg clearly showed you have no leg to stand on.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
