Lessons from Fiona Bruce is gaslighting. Let's look at what she's done here:
1) She has played the victim. She insists that she had to 'legally contextualise' the remarks about Stanley Johnson. Not like *that* she didn't. 1/8
2) She suggests that she has been misunderstood or misrepresented, that she actually said 'it was a one off' not that she quoted the 'friends of Stanley Johnson' saying such a crass thing. She is deliberately fudging the fact that reintroducing that defence is awful. 2/8
3) She has suggested that she didn't minimise domestic abuse. I disagree. I think she did. She swept it away - didn't allow the panel member to finish her comment - and swiftly moved on with a pre-written reply. She - in other words - minimised the criticism and stifled it. 3/8
4) She reiterates that she was supposedly 'required to say' what she said. I do not believe that she was required to say *that*. She also did not say that Charlotte - the ex-wife of Stanley Johnson - reported that she was repeatedly assaulted. Fiona Bruce could have. 4/8
5) "But I can apologise for the very real impact that I can see it has had" - this is also known as the infamous "I am sorry that you feel this way" or "I am sorry about how you feel". Which is an insult and it's (once again) victim blaming - which DV victims often face. 5/8
6) I'm glad that she has stepped down from Refuge - clearly could not stay - but she has demonstrated no accountability for what she said (blames everyone else) and shows only that she feels that she has been wronged. 6/8
7) Fiona Bruce is trying to persuade people that she was misunderstood. No - I for one appreciate that she quoted other people - but she underlined that as some type of valid or reasonable defence or mitigating circumstance to domestic violence by doing so. 7/8
It is absolutely time for Fiona Bruce to step down from BBC Question Time. She has been acting as a goalie for the Tory Party since the day she took the job on. She throws herself on every hand-grenade. In front of every bullet. Her purpose is clear. 8/8 #GTTO

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philip Priestley 🇪🇺🇮🇪

Philip Priestley 🇪🇺🇮🇪 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PublicPriestley

Mar 11
Let's be honest about what "Stop the boats" means as a slogan. They are putting the emphasis on 'the boat' because it's an inanimate object, not a person. They actually mean "Stop human rights". If the boats were empty - they'd have no problem with 'the boats'. 1/14
One of the key plays in the fascist narrative is to use language that dehumanises and detaches sympathy from the people being targeted. Fascists target the most vulnerable. Here we have people that the government have said they must absolutely stop (not boats). 2/14
'The boats' exist because there is no safe method of claiming asylum in the UK. Suella Braverman doesn't want there to be one and she robustly refuses to create one. Create one and 'the boats' become unnecessary. But it isn't 'the boats' that is the problem, is it? 3/14
Read 14 tweets
Mar 10
Worried about balance and impartiality on the BBC? Yes - I am. Fiona Bruce's defence of Stanley Johnson was not balance and impartiality, nor was it about discharging a responsibility towards defamation or libel - easy to hide behind such things. It was bias. 1/15
"To clarify Stanley Johnson has been repeatedly accused of breaking the nose of Boris Johnson's mother. He has refused to comment on the matter, however his ex-wife has said she was a repeated victim of domestic abuse. Stanley Johnson has not been convicted." Not what she said.
Instead Bruce pivoted to unnamed sources that support Stanley Johnson who have apparently dismissed the incident as a 'one off' - despite stating that it did actually happen. 3/15
Read 16 tweets
Feb 25
Ok so fairly usual for me to do a weekend thread. I thought I'd do one about the Great Famine of Ireland and why it should never be called 'the potato famine' - as it is often referred to, particularly in England. Also how shameful the Brexit deal really is for Ireland. 1/24
So yes - there was a famine, a horrific famine actually and the famine was definitely to do with a blight on potatos. This blight afflicted potato crops all over Europe though - not just in Ireland at that time. So why not call it a potato famine? 2/24
Well the blight was only one factor in what was a massive humanitarian disaster. 25% of the country left the island and this has never been repeated in socio-economic movement anywhere since. 3/24
Read 24 tweets
Feb 22
Would you like an insight into Royal behaviour? Learn from history - 'Bertie - A life of Edward VII' by Jane Ridley will give you an astonishing view of mistreated and abused women, forced abortions, mistreated servants (and friends) and unfettered 'Royal' entitlement. 1/6 Image
There are no misty eyed recollections. He's described as a man who - with his friends - was always more than happy to forget about his social rank... provided that nobody else did. Ridley's excellent research into letters and historical records bring a... 2/6
character to life vividly - and not only his character, but that of his mother (Queen Victoria), his wife (Alexandra) and the rest of his family spread across Europe. His remarkable privilege, his expectations and exceptionalism - unflinchingly on display. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Feb 17
I don't know if people are broadly aware of the matter of the 1971-1976 Ford Pinto, but it's a lesson in big business capitalism. This was a highly desirable sub-compact introduced by Ford in the early 1970s... 1/12
The problem with the Ford Pinto was that if it got rear ended in a collision there was a unreasonable risk that it would burst into flames. It became known as a car that exploded. This is not a great safety feature, obviously. 2/12
The issue was that Ford actually knew - and were successfully sued - because they knew about this alarming issue. The fact was - bottom line - calculating the risk of an explosion, and the cost of compensation, fixing the car was more expensive. So they didn't. 3/12
Read 12 tweets
Feb 16
Given the revelations in the Guardian today about the £3.3bn profit scandal at British Gas/Centrica it's worth considering *why* privatisation of utilities simply doesn't work. Many people aren't familiar with the term 'elasticity of demand' (some are) but it describes... 1/16
how with some commodities the change in price doesn't significantly adjust or influence consumption. Many things do respond to price changes, but some things won't. Fuel & utilities are an example of something that people simply cannot live without - no matter how expensive. 2/16
This is called 'inelasticity'. Basically petrol (for example) can spiral in cost and you are still going to be at the pump putting fuel in your car because you must get to work. You are likely to cut back in other areas - but fuel you *need*. 3/16
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(