Why Hindutva = R^pedutva: The Case of Rakshasa Marriage
Traditional Hindu religious texts permit warriors to kidnap females (including young female children) from political enemies - then forcefully marry & have sex w/ them. This is referred to as "rakshasa marriage."
The...
The British outlawed rakshasa marriage. Nevertheless, proponents of Hindutva (like VD Savarkar) have continued to champion it, especially against Muslims. This has led to the mass kidnapping and rape of Muslim women. Such actions were particularly widespread at the...
time of partition, but have continued up until this day (e.g., r^pe and sexual abuse of Indian Muslim women during Holi).
Proponents of Hindutva justify such actions not only with reference to their religious texts, but with reference to past events. They note that...
in the past only Muslims were powerful enough to win wars, take slaves, and have sex with them. Every time Hindus sought to make war on Muslims, and kidnap Muslim women - they were defeated and humiliated. This meant that Hindu women were taken by Muslims, but Muslim women...
were not taken by Hindus.
Proponents of Hindutva hold that Hindus must accumulate power so that they can take Muslim women.
For more information on rakshasa marriage, see this article from @BheriaMS:
"Islam endorses war (jihad) to impose its law (Sharia) across the world. Therefore Islam approves killing ppl across the world. Muslims are dangerous - your Muslim neighbor literally wants to knife your little girl & then blow up the local McDonalds."
"Liberalism endorses war (e.g. colonialism, humanitarian intervention, military occupation) to impose its law (international human rights law) across the world. Therefore liberalism approves killing ppl across the world. Liberals are dangerous - your liberal neighbor literally...
wants to knife your little daughter and then blow up the local mosque."
Why do so many idiots find the first argument logical and compelling, while they find the second argument illogical and absurd? Aren't both arguments illogical and absurd?
.@jordanbpeterson didn't understand my point, so let me elaborate here.
Gender is not reducible to purely psychological traits or purely bodily traits (e.g., genitals, DNA). It is partly psychological traits and partly bodily traits.
Psychological traits associated with...
masculinity include sexual desire for women, assertiveness, competitiveness, status seeking, desire to defend and care for one's family and social group. Such psychological traits are associated with the male brain and hormones.
Bodily traits include male genitalia, height,...
muscle, facial hair, deeper voice, etc.
Muslims (like all tradition-adhering peoples) always viewed gender as part psychological and part bodily.
It is Western cuckservatives (i.e. conservative liberals) that tend to reduce being a woman to bodily traits.
A few questions for the writer of this iditoic thread @KnowlandKnows:
Were the ancient Greeks Europeans? Do you know that the Greeks (e.g., under Alexander) conquered large regions of the world (including parts of Africa) and...
enslaved peoples there and practiced slave trade?
Were the ancient Romans Europeans? Do you know that the Romans conquered large regions of the world (including parts of Africa) and enslaved peoples there and engaged in slave trade?
Liberals hate all premodern cultures, as these conflict with evolving liberal norms. Liberals believe that all such cultures must be changed/destroyed.
The part of culture that liberals hate the most is religion, for this part is most resistant to change/destruction.
The...
type of religion that liberals hate the most are Judaism, Christianity, Islam. This is because these religions are more resistant to change/destruction than other types of religion (e.g., hunter-gatherer, Indic, East Asian).
But the specific religion...
that liberals hate the most is Islam because Islam is the religion which is most resistant to change/destruction.
It is the religion they seethe at the most, as you can observe for yourself on all social media platforms, despite the fact that the biggest problems they have...
Hindutva claims to embody Hindu pride, and a rejection of colonialism and white racism.
Nevertheless virtually every proponent of Hindutva agrees with the following statement (explicitly or implicitly):
We accept the norms that were violently imposed on us, during...
colonialism, by our white British masters.
This is because the norms of our masters are superior to the norms found in Hinduism.
The British were correct in banning monstrous Hindu practices like caste, untouchability, female infanticide, wife burning, bars on widow...
remarraige, bars on female inheritance of property, minor marriage, polygyny, human sacrifice to kali, etc.
The only aspects of Hinduism we retain are those which do not conflict with the superior norms of our white British masters. Even to this day, whenever the British or ...
Did you know, according to Buddhist texts, the Buddha advised wife beating?
This is found in the Jataka tales. Buddhists believe that the Buddha had 500 or so past lives (via reincarnation). These lives are described in the Jataka tales. In the story known as "Kosiya Jataka"...
the Buddha is incarnated as a wise Brahmin teacher. One of his students has a wife with many faults. She is spoiled and lazy, refusing to do her required housework. She is also guilty of adultery. To solve the problem, the Buddha instructs his student to make a foul-smelling...
pot of cow feces mixed with sour fruits - then threaten to beat his wife if she didnt eat it. The Buddha's wise advice is depicted as producing excellent results, convincing the wife to change her behavior and do her housework.
Unsurprisingly...