B. Beware, few understand SARS viral persistence as cause of LongCovid (etiology). IDK why!
MDs then treat symptoms, not causes. Be sure not to waste time you don't have.
Demand a viral load test. HIV T cell depletion tests can diagnose Long Covid, just as it did for Long SARS.
C. Always teach the relevant scales and dynamics.
65 million patients!?!
That's twice as many as people living with HIV, and you're treated far worse: often gaslit, no POC T cell test, people mostly ignore you.
On the AIDS timeline, we are in the early 1980s.
Read this again.
D. That's why charming little people like me have no qualms about comparing SARS-CoV and HIV even if it makes bigger people who wrote terrible policies over the past three years uncomfortable.
H. That's the state of COVID-19 politics as we enter Year Four of a pandemic that (1) should never have gone past summer 2020, had states followed their own pandemic playbooks, as they did for SARS 2003 (see thesis) and H1N1 2009.
I. There should never have been 10,000s of LongCovid patients, even; never mind millions.
Some of these questions are hard. Others, really not.
Happy organizing everyone!
I'll shut up now 🤣
J. COVID-19 (1) should never have gone past summer 2020 and (2) could still end any day by existing law (IHR 2005). We're the only people consistently making this point.
It doesn't show us to be smart; but something to be deeply wrong in current politics.
People want citations for the claim survival rates 20 years post infection at age 50 may be less than 30%. Look at emerging trends. =>Lawyers and epidemiologists’ job
=>Precautionary principle. Don’t wait to demand policy change
2. I encourage folks to ask smart economists like @lajohnstondr who know trends in China for analysis of these demographic transitions. You can literally see the moment when policymakers got bored with protecting the population in the data!
See old societies like Japan, Germany.
3. @adam_tooze is right. Pay attention to what the pandemic does to rich/old and poor/old countries. You’d expect major societal decline if a country suddenly (subconsciously) decides to throw their old under the bus. Russia already got there; the rest I hope is redeemable.
You see how public health and science are not on equal footing, right?
Some are flying higher than others! Time to ground them in facts again.
Some may think I’m joking in saying there is a tradeoff between climate and society, or my identities as climate scholar/activist and other roles in life.
We may be transparent on Twitter, but wider society is not.
Public health makes this clear. We need to address it clearly.
Project alert! Good things on the way, perhaps @BabaBrinkman-grade scientific rap: Idea is a track on molnupiravir, a public health risk since the (useless) drug can create supermutated variants and exacerbate the pandemic.
1. Azvudine. Requires medical supervision and competent governance. It's no free-pass to end COVID-19. (Only share with this context.)
Fosun and Genuine Biotech donated ~400,000 bottles of Azvudine tablets worth RMB 100 million to rural counties in China. prnewswire.com/news-releases/…
2. This overview of COVID-19 antivirals for patients with chronic kidney disease notes that Azvudine may be used also for patients with HIV or CKD and COVID-19 coinfection. frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
3. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) with broad-spectrum antiviral activity against HIV,
HCV, EV71, and HBV infection that modulates the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Also effective against SARS-CoV-2.
One completely irrational. The other rational—or so we think.
(1) I must admit watching systemic failure live makes it easier to apply for $ for ideas to stop total systemic failure. (2) 1-10% that we (I) are deluded, and I mix up the ir/rational.