It’s been a bit since we highlighted the methodology of The Universal Golf Rankings (TUGR) and why we believe it’s the purest way to rank golfers, as well as the most accurate in this new world of divided tours.
To all the new followers, here’s the rundown…
(2/5)
Most ranking systems in golf, including OWGR and the new SI rankings, are what we are calling a “points-based” system.
Essentially they create a scoring system and award points based on a number of factors and assumptions that go into their black-box formula…
(3/5)
Their weightings, assumptions, and imbedded biases spit out a number, and poof, that’s how they rank golfers.
Through this whole process, accuracy is lost.
At TUGR, we have found a better way to accurately rank all golfers without using convoluted formulas…
(4/5)
At TUGR, our methodology is simple, understandable, and accurate.
We rank golfers using head-to-head matchups, individually, and then map all of the results on a massive grid.
We then leverage the power of cloud computing to accurately rank all of these matchups…
(5/5)
In other words, our rankings are based on actual performance data - crazy isn’t it! We actually use performance to rank golfers.
Since LIV golfers play in majors are other DP events, there is enough cross-over to accurately and systematically integrate them into the rank
(Bonus)
We could dive into much more, but visit us at TUGR.org to see the difference and why we believe TUGR is the most accurate way to rank all golfers in an unbiased and independent way.
One of the big debates we hear is whether guaranteed money with LIV will cause players to practice less, lose their edge, and simply play worse since there’s less on the line.
The beauty of TUGR is we can measure this.
A 🧵…
2/11
Since we use head-to-head performance, every stroke counts and everyone is benchmarked against the #1 players in the world.
Let’s look at some numbers just in an few short months of 2023. With LIV players playing around the world, we have plenty of numbers to use…
3/11
At the beginning of 2023, using TUGR rankings of course:
12 LIV players in top 50
22 LIV players in top 100
The 50th ranked player on avg shot 1.71 shots/rd worse than the #1 ranked player.
The 100th best player on avg shot 2.17 shots/rd worse than the #1 ranked player.
Does a two-tiered PGAT system actually make it more likely for really good PGAT players stuck in the two-tiered purgatory to jump to LIV?
It's really just game-theory...
2/9
Let's say for two consecutive years you finish 52nd and 59th in the #FedExCup. Missing out on easy guaranteed money the next year by such a close margin.
What if LIV comes calling?
You're probably a top-100 player in the world, or close to, if you're doing that well...
3/9
... and LIV is always going to be looking for Top-100 players to pad their ranks.
They offer a contract. 4 years, guaranteed money. They've got some smart people so they back into what you'd probably make over the next 4 years, and then they 2.5x that number...
A quick trip down memory lane and how TUGR was born from a trip like we took in 2018…
We were on our annual trip which that year took us to Sawgrass.
This is a cropped picture of the Champions Locker Room where we were lucky enough to get a tour…
After playing 18, we grabbed dinner on the patio. I don’t know his name, but a man who did something important there came to our table and started talking to us.
He found out that our golf pilgrimage that year had brought up to Sawgrass. A family affair every year…
He clearly was someone in charge, bc he then invited us to take a tour, and next thing you know we’re in the Champions locker room and sitting in the barber chair and looking at all the names. What a cool experience…
As Professional golf continues to get more divided, not unified,
A quick thread on why TUGR is built to accommodate this division.
On a recent podcast I speculated what if within 5 years “another” tour pops up to lure away the top players…
2/6)
Little did I know it would be the PGAT dividing itself into two-tiers that would fulfill this prediction.
I suppose “another” tour could still pop up, but the point is that “points-based” rankings will keep falling behind with their accuracy in this divided state….
(3/6)
These systems will start looking more like the GHIN handicap system where each course and tournament get some sort of rating that is nearly impossible to have uniformity and accuracy…