Mark Dorin Profile picture
Mar 16 5 tweets 2 min read
#KrisKinnear stars as a landowner with a problem flare pit in this short film, an advertisement for #RStar.

@DonBraid⁩ column states that Kinnear is “Smith’s special projects manager who works on policy for flare pits and abandoned wells”.
🧵/1
#RStar lobby:

“He (like Smith) was a lobbyist around that issue. According to the premier, he quit that position in October …But the NDP produced a registry document listing him as a director of Sustaining Alberta’s Energy Network, a non-profit.”
/2


calgaryherald.com/opinion/column…
It’s also well documented that Sustaining Alberta’s Energy Network (SAEN) raised money for UCP candidates and that Kinnear was involved in Smith’s leadership campaign.

Is this why he’s working on flarepit and abandoned well policy?
/3
I’ve previously Tweeted that the RStar pilot is focused on contaminated flare pits and sumps, which are governed by land remediation laws. There’s no evidence Kinnear has any environmental law qualifications.
/4
This is lobbyists sticking together to act for their taskmasters, as opposed to governing in the public interest and hiring qualified personnel to make policy recommendations
/5

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Dorin

Mark Dorin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mark_dorin

Mar 13
Trespass (note proper spelling) by oil & gas companies on private lands is rampant in Alberta.

I’d venture to say trespass by federal govt. employees is virtually non-existent.

What to do about this?
Fix the non existent problem and ignore the acute problem of course!
1/n
Is the Government of Canada trespassing in Alberta? Can a Government trespass?

Here’s the amendment to the Petty Trespass Act (including the correct spelling).
2/n Image
Here’s comment on the proposed amendment to the Petty Trespass Act by the Farmer’s Advocate doubling as the Property Rights Advocate:
3/n Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 26
Rather than clarifying, instead of sticking to messaging that @PeterGuthrie99 is performing consultations with everyone except the public who will pick up the tab, the Premier adds to #RStar confusion on her Saturday morning show at 15:30.
Comments. 1/n
globalnews.ca/edmonton/progr…
To begin, perhaps the Premier didn't speak to her minister or is overriding his supposed shelving of the Pilot project as reported by @EmmaLGraney? Whatever reason, the Premier gave a full steam ahead impression the next morning on the radio.
2/n
My late father was proud of a 1980 award by the courts for $7,500 for mental anguish related to drilling of an urban well. To hear the Premier publicly say that landowners suffer (compensable) stress would have pleased him. It will sure piss off industry & Tribunal members!
3/n
Read 9 tweets
Feb 25
Follower @MargTokar asked me to comment on a great piece (below) by the @thenarwhalca.

My comments on how the relentless @OilGasCanada lobby crossed a line - mounted inappropriate attack on the participatory and safety rights of landowners.
1/n
thenarwhal.ca/capp-oil-lobby…
Decades ago mineral owners & those who acquired rights to develop subsurface petroleum & natural gas resources had the common law right to use land surfaces they did not own. This changed somewhat no later than 1947 in Alberta. The law today includes the Surface Rights Act.
2/n
The law includes the Alberta Bill of Rights, and the right to security and safety of the person is protected by the federal Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Starting point is property rights can be taken only by due process of law, but safety rights are unchallengeable.
3/n
Read 17 tweets
Feb 24
SIGH: Danielle Smith's plan the @globeandmail argues should be abandoned is NOT an orphan well plan.
The plan is to clean up contaminated sites with responsible owners (opposite of orphans).
Other errors in this piece.
A critique 🧵 1/n

@globeandmail theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
For starters, the Liability Management Incentive Plan is not a plan designed to clean up "abandoned" (meaning the owner has walked away) wells or "abandoned" wells (meaning the well bore is sealed according to AER Directive 020 rule, the official definition).
2/n
Rather then plan is to incent clean up of INACTIVE (for at least 20 years) wells and sites that still have a viable licensee that is identifiable, exists as a corporate entity, and is legally responsible (the opposite of an orphan well or an "abandoned" someone has deserted).
3/n
Read 11 tweets
Feb 12
[1] #RStarScam (Liability Management Incentive Program) IS NOT ABOUT ORPHAN WELLS.

Let's clear up misconceptions about Alberta's complex laws on who pays for oil & gas well end of life - "closure" – costs for wells. Misconceptions include terminology misunderstandings.+
[2] “Closure” means collectively (1) wellbore plugging ; (2) soil remediation; and (3) site restoration or reclamation.

An "orphan" is a well that has no responsible owner/licensee to perform closure work or pay for it.

"Abandoned" wells are sealed (not left behind by owner).+
[3] Explained below as per Alberta law is: who covers closure & related costs (industry) for:

1. wells with a viable responsible owner/well licensee (RStar applies; versus,

2. wells that do not have a viable owner to look after them or pay for closure ("orphans”). +
Read 11 tweets
Feb 12
What a mess this piece is!

No wonder folks are confused. It jumps from RStar to orphans, to compensation ordered by the Tribunal for orphans reduced, back to RStar, back to reduced orphan compensation with incorrect facts. Yikes!
A tear down.
1/n

calgaryherald.com/business/premi…
First I agree with @KathleenGanley, the NDP energy critic. Hands off royalties to those in the Premier's office and Alberta Energy. Bureaucrats know better. This is cronyism at its worst. Now on to issues related to references to landowner representative Darryl Bennett.

2/n
Bennett is director of Action Surface Rights but not necessarily the Surface Rights Federation, which federation may be defunct and by no means speaks for landowners or their associations at large.
Regardless, Bennett would never say what is quoted below:

3/n
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(