I'm afraid this is a load of shite. Funnily enough, just yesterday I'd noticed that the last few issues of FHM (2014/15) were still available on Readly, and I had a look over them with a committed feminist of my acquaintance.
FHM's motto was "It's great to be a man", and it did its best to uphold it. And that certainly did involve a lot of scantily-clad ladies on the front cover. (Compare to modern-day Esquire, which is an almost totally female-free zone.)
But there was surprisingly little of that inside. (Not NONE - check out the extraordinary photographic aesthetics on this very saucy shot of Helen Flanagan, and the pics of "the world's sexiest behavioural psychologist" - but a pretty small proportion of the pagecount.)
Most of the magazine was just full of FUN STUFF FOR MEN.
Remember, this is just eight years ago - all these pics are from the September 2014 issue. There wasn't much indyref coverage, but there was lots of completely harmless amusement for young males. (With the odd gratuitous bikini model. The HORROR.)
It's mostly very well-written, and while it's hardly a thoughtful treatise on femininity, the tone - as with nearly all "lad mags" is one of awed worship of women, not misogyny. Focused on the pretty ones, sure, but with no darker edge.
But mostly it's just a really fun read to brighten your day. There are more serious articles scattered through, but mostly it just wants to give you a laugh and cheer you up.
And it wasn't scared to tackle the big issues.
The message for its young male readers was one of positivity and empowerment. You can do stuff! It's possible if you just try! Go and work in Europe! Don't be scared of bad men! Eat healthily and drink low-alcohol-beer!
Contrast all this with women's magazines, whose primary message was and still is "YOU'RE FAT AND UGLY AND UNFASHIONABLE AND BORING! HERE'S LOTS OF STUFF YOU NEED TO BUY TO FIX IT SO YOU DON'T DIE ALONE!
The last time Esquire had a woman in her bra on the cover was Kate Winslet (then 40) in November 2015. But see if you notice anything about the interview.
I'll give you a minute to see if you spot it. But here's the shit Esquire readers have to endure now.
Honestly, about 50% of the pagination is watch adverts or articles about watches.
Like, how many fucking watches am I meant to be buying every month?
The few bits that aren't about watches are about sensible furniture, banking and personal grooming. (And watches.) What's more FUN than a Chantecaille Gold Energising Eye Recovery Mask or a Jaxon Lane Enzyme Powder Face Wash?
(If you think I'm comparing apples and oranges here, I worked quite a bit for Esquire in the 1990s. It was basically exactly the same as FHM except maybe 10% more intelligent.)
But I'm getting sidetracked by all the watches. Point is, FHM and its ilk were *not* primers for misogyny. If anything, modern-day men's mags that don't consider a single woman worthy of appearing in their pages are the misogynists. Women are invisible to them.
Literally the ONLY female person in that entire issue of Esquire was Elliot Page, and only because they deemed her to be actually a man. A promotion!
FHM et al (and obviously there were gradations - some were cruder than others, and Zoo was genuinely ugly, but it was the only one) taught young men that women are awesome, and if you were funny and interesting and sufficiently nice to them they might have sex with you.
Now young men have Pornhub instead, and Andrew tate and magazines like Vice telling them how best to choke women until they become your sex workers, and how if they can't get any they can just BE women, and be much better at it than stupid old actual women are.
I know which of those I think is the healthier messaging. /ENDS
PS: the "generation of toxic misogynists" isn't the one that was reading FHM and Loaded in the 90s and 2000s. It's people who weren't BORN until the late 90s and 2000s. Most of the woke misogynists are in their teens and early 20s ffs. Get a grip.
And the older Billy Bragg misogynists wouldn't have been seen dead reading fucking FHM.
The shift in male culture in those eight short years - coinciding exactly with the rise of transgender ideology - has been a turn very very very much for the worse.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wings Over Scotland

Wings Over Scotland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WingsScotland

Mar 15
I mean, how would this - going ahead with "the big players" only - work? Would you still have to pay the deposit in wee shops, but only be able to reclaim it at big ones? That's a disaster for the wee shops.
Or would you NOT have to pay it at wee shops, in which case you could buy stuff cheap at the corner shop but then claim the non-existent deposit back at Tesco? Massive wealth redistribution, I like it! Tesco not so keen.
Or are they only talking about producers? In which case you put those producers who are just on the wrong side of the arbitrary line at a massive disadvantage compared to those who are just on the right side of the line?
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
@RoddyQC @holyroodmandy @theSNP @HumzaYousaf @_KateForbes @AshReganSNP I don't think they're bought or sold, or directed by sinister foreign owners. But as a professional journalist of 32 years' experience, I feel qualified to assert that they are almost all abysmal at their jobs - lazy, complacent, groundlessly arrogant, and incurious.
@RoddyQC @holyroodmandy @theSNP @HumzaYousaf @_KateForbes @AshReganSNP There are of course exceptions (Mandy included), and I draw no political distinctions. There are terrible, terrible journalists, and a handful of good ones, on both sides of the constitutional divide.
@RoddyQC @holyroodmandy @theSNP @HumzaYousaf @_KateForbes @AshReganSNP But genuinely, most of Scotland's hacks would not have met the basic standards of ability and competence we required for an entry-level staff writer covering Sonic The Hedgehog games at Future Publishing in the 1990s.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 2
Told to expect a significant story on Sky News in 20 minutes, gang. No more info.
Now told it's 4.30 and downgraded from "significant" to "interesting". Stand down 🕵️‍♂️
I'm going back to Tipping Point.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 1
Yousaf first up, delivers a slick but content-free speech. Forbes is next up, and the sound on the stream immediately cuts out. Seriously.
Sound back on. Forbes claims to have started as an activist when she was 17, which I think would have been 2008. Hmmm.
Forbes is speaking without notes, unlike Yousaf. Both are basically fobbing off indy policy on the members. Forbes says the goal is "a referendum".
Read 57 tweets
Feb 24
OMFG the BBC just showed us about 60 seconds of Ash Regan's launch and now they're doing an interview with some wee woke SNP Students prick from... Stirling University 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
You couldn't make this up as a pisstake. This wee tosser has had more airtime than Ash Regan, and none of his bullshit is being challenged in any way.
"I think it's important we keep the Greens happy", he just said in response to another gently-lobbed softball question from the friendly presenter, and then rubbished the defacto referendum 🤦‍♂️
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(