New Mexico is a little too poor and "foreign" to attract many incomers.

Mostly just bohemians and the very wealthy move here.

Basically zero mass in-migration.

AZ is basically just a dry FL.
I love it but I guess I'm a bohemian.

Most either are repelled at first sight, or some think they would like it, move, and then leave within 2 years.

It's a known dynamic.
One thing I really like is the pronounced slowness. For being in the USA, its pretty darn slow.

Drives some people absolutely crazy however.

Like businesses aren't always open, or the "guy" you need isn't there.

Things get canceled when the weather is bad, etc.
Now the extremely wealthy love it.

An incredible percent of A list celebs, and other big time people have at least part time homes here.

The Epstein ranch where he was supposedly going to do eugenics was in NM, etc.

Look at Santa Fe Zillow, sort by "highest price." Nuts.
New Mexico also gets few CA-leaving migrants.

Most of them drive right on through while fleeing to somewhere else.

I guess a few settle around Silver City but CA migration is not a big thing to my knowledge.
Arizona is essentially a place where people go to live out their middle class dreams. A house in a good suburb, everything is new and clean.

No one comes to or stays in NM for those reasons.

It's not that sort of place. Next to AZ but *opposite* in many ways.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Van Buskirk

Adam Van Buskirk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Empty_America

Mar 19
America *was* the Frontier and as such, American thought since 1890 has largely been a response to the dislocating loss of a visible, physical frontier.

On one hand you have enthusiasm for Space, for foreign military and imperial adventures.

New Frontiers.
Or you have the rather extraordinary development of a neo-shamanistic drug culture since 1960.

Use of psychedelics in an effort to explore inner frontiers.

Or religious practices that promise the mysterious.
On the other hand you have Wendell Berry and his disciples, or even things like woke demands to "de-colonize" this and that.

Express rejections of the frontier ethos.

A new ethos of rootedness, permanency, domesticity.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
The other weird Old America thing comes when you start to really grasp the Ante-Bellum southern mindset.

Many expressly preferred a majority black slave society and were hostile to poor whites.

And they specifically wanted to extent this way of life into new territories, under… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
As I said, the Antebellum mindset doesn't really exist today.

"Racism" today is ironically almost the inverse, its a desire to be apart. Not to live with and dominate.

I guess some pro-immigration neo-cons come closest!
Rhodesia BTW was a failed effort to create a "master society."

They expressly discouraged and prevented immigration of working-class whites into the colony.

They did not want a white majority, they wanted a very small white planter class only.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18
If you have restrictive or "shaming" type expectations for how your kids will live their adult lives, you need to be prepared to write the check.

If they need to be dentists or have a farm next door you need to be ready to sacrifice your own lifestyle ($) to make it happen.
Big difference between a father who expects or hopes for some care in old age vs. someone who expects kids to live their adult lives according to the Father's dream.

If you want to be the Boss you need to be materially at that level. Need to fund.
Heavily paternalistic, filial-duty-based extended family systems are certainly a thing that exists.

But the Patriarch has real material responsibilities that are entirely unlike what we are accustomed to.

He does things like buy homes for adult children, etc.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 18
What do I think of ex-pating in light of my relative optimism about USA?

IMO ex-pating is purely a matter of pleasure seeking.

You might get a more exquisite life that way. More elegant or exciting. Or maybe not.

It's a luxury activity that Americans can do.
But if you are just looking to live a decent life, with a roof over your head, reasonable public safety and enough to eat . . .

Most places in America will do that as reliably as anywhere on earth.

There is a lot of America out there.
Now you might say "I wish to expat to get away from American moral deterioration."

But to find a country notably more conservative on social issues than Red State USA you are mostly looking at the developing world, and/or Islam.

Not what most are looking for at all.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
OK this is my refined "Declinist Challenge."

Game is to call the decade when this occurs. Which would indicate current World Civ is "past peak."

I'm calling "doesn't happen in foreseeable future."

@RizomaSchool
You need all 3 to call decline because there are some weird combinations possible.

LE could fall, but shipping up and massive space activity occurring (large poor world population)

Or LE could increase, but shipping and space decline (Small affluent world population).
The key difficulty for the Declinist is distinguishing a serious correction from the "all time peak" which is followed by true decline.

It's like the Dow. Dow has corrected but the all time peak has almost certainly not yet been reached.

1929, 1987 were *blips*
Read 5 tweets
Mar 17
Ok so this is basically my challenge for declinists.

You call the approximate year when global average life expectancy falls below the figure for the year 2000.
So I think "global LE falls below year 2000" is a pretty good collapse metric.

But there are a couple weird ways this could mis-signal.

One is if population greatly grows, and world system is supporting many more people at lower standard of living yet doing big tech stuff.
Another one would be if affluence reaches the point where LE decreases due to over-indulgences, as in the USA.

In this scenario also, tech advances strongly, but LE would fall.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(