3. Just a minor example, but consider the deeper (epidemiological, political) point. If your public policy doesn’t reflect these facets of life, I have bad news for your public policy.
1. Every day, not just today, is IPCC time. Hop on in!
It's all atmospheric and ocean chemistry in the end, genuinely fascinating. At a deeper level, then, it's about the culture and mental models that drive human behavior in the physical world.
Feedback time! For what it's worth, we have serious policy problems to address. - thanks for some 7k followers for a non-affiliated, no-name account like mine. Much appreciate all exchange and learning!
What will always be funny: - Asking "How we can sustain complex societies over the coming decades?" garnered so little attention that my autodelete function killed it lmao. Thanks for all who care and try their best!
This great Dark Anthropocene scholar meme by the kind @EliotJacobson reminded me to update the Covid equivalent.
It’s a point @RealCheckMarker made on ‘corporate democracies’ that sacrifice their citizens’ health for the (minuscule+highly subsidized) profit of airlines. However,
Meet the dumbest possible pandemic view, kindly verbalized by Leana Wen. Do the exact opposite of whatever she proposes and you should do fine for yourself.
How is she ever let anywhere near a policy (advice) role? That’s the real question here.
While Twitter never is medical advice, you now see virologic failure (sounds less cute than Paxlovid ‘rebound’, no? 🤦🏻♀️), viral persistence and resistance. Had MDs/scientists paid any attention, they’d have known better than to try monotherapies vs. SARS-CoV.
(1) Read this presentation (on HIV viral load) to understand the basic dynamics. (2) We warned extremely clearly. There is no way to beat SARS and SARS-CoV - disease and virus - if scientists continue to ignore the harsh lessons learned in 40 years of HIV science.