Looking forward to speaking at today's @UWEJournalism event on the sustainability of #LocalNews - specifically, public interest news (as opposed to commercial/tabloid).
The movement to 'save local news' has gained momentum recently - here's how 🧵👇[1/11]
#LocalNews has been shelled out & corporate mergers abound in the internet era. Many have been left with inadequate news, if any
As shown by this @TheBristolCable thread (PS I wrote it) independents sprung up to fill gaps - but are surviving, not thriving
[3/11] How might they thrive? A number of us are working behind the scenes to find ways.
The Charitable Journalism Project (@CharitableJP) is trying to convince the government to make it easier for eligible local/community newsrooms to become charities...
[4/11] ...and the Public Interest News Foundation (@PINewsF) alongside @sdp are working on a '#LocalNews Plan' pilot project to see how local communities/businesses/groups can come together to sustain their public interest newsrooms in different places/contexts across the UK.
[5/11] This work has been happening alongside a number of gov inquiries.
2019's Cairncross Review looked into the sustainability of journalism generally, finding "Investigative journalism and democracy reporting are the areas of journalism most worthy and most under threat"...
[6/11] ..."The cost of investigative journalism is great
and rarely seems to pay for itself." #LocalNews
[7/11] Cairncross was followed by a 2020 House of Lords inquiry into the Future of UK Journalism and last month a DCMS inquiry into the sustainability of #LocalNews specifically.
Numerous recommendations were made across all 3, none of which have been implemented by government.
[8/11] You can read the recommendations of the Cairncross Review here: gov.uk/government/pub…
[11/11] The groundwork is there. The research is there & ready to be implemented by a dedicated group of public interest news campaigners & journalists.
There is currently no political will.
MPs that understand free speech, citizenship & democracy should support this movement.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I reviewed @ProfBillMcGuire’s new book, which gives us not only an outline of what #London (+ elsewhere) will look like if we don’t act on climate, but specific steps on What To Do Next…
The final section is quite awesome. It outlines two scenarios for what London could look, sound and feel like in 2100.
In order to achieve the scenario that isn’t Children of Men in an Oven, McGuire makes clear that while individuals can (and must) make specific changes… 2/5🪡
…the critical, highest impact changes must happen at systemic/govt level, immediately, and an easy start point is curbing emissions from the 1% who each emit on avg 70tn CO2 each year, to the avg Brit’s 8.4tns.
Here are some of my annot. on powerful systemic solutions:
3/5🪡
As climate chaos continues (and worsens if we don’t radically cut emissions) articles reporting either what’s happening, or what’s projected to happen/diff potential scenarios, will keep coming. 2/10🪡
How these are framed - and who is the source/where source material is from - is key. The G env. desk reports on the latest scientific publication, with mix of sobriety/urgency.
The Mail, as an example, publishes dismissive op-eds by fossil fuel PR men:
3/10🪡
What @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance, and other scientists on the call, said in Monday's #ClimateBriefing to MPs: a thread 🧵🪡
[1/17]
[Video in final tweet, thanks @Angus_Climate@CarolineLucas for making this happen & all MPs who attended - release the list!)
1) "Technology is not a magic solution and it will not solve [climate crisis] on its own. [...] Any technology that you can't see already is not gonna save our bacon, it's absolutely not gonna get us out of this" because of the scale of the problem and solutions needed. [2/17]
2) "The timescale of this is such that 2050 is not a long way away, because you can't get things done at scale if you leave them a long time. That's why now is an important period" [3/17]
Every Bill McKibben text is the Very Best of creative non-fiction, but this piece hits hard more than 3 decades later:
"As long as the desire for endless material advancement drives us, there is no way to set limits.
If our way of life is ending nature..." 2/10
"...it is not radical to talk about transforming our way of life."
I was moved by how close this is to @antonioguterres' statement just 3 weeks ago that it's those pursuing fossil fuels, not climate activists, who are the "dangerous radicals". 3/10
Here is a concrete, little-known example of how @Channel4 provides value to UK citizens **without costing us any money**, and why privatising the broadcaster will 🚨strip this value away🚨
The year was 2010... 🧵🪡 1/15
C4 had won its bid for the rights to broadcast the 2012 Paralympic Games, citing its public service remit to "to champion unheard voices, to innovate and take bold creative risks, to inspire change and to celebrate diversity".
They took this win seriously... /2
...making a pledge not only to create great coverage, but: /3