Here’s a short thread on how top Proud Boy defendant Ethan (“Rufio Panman”) Nordean came to lash out in anguish to his fellow PBs on 1/20/21: “FUCK TRUMP! Fuck him more than Biden.” It’s from exhibits introduced on Thursday. ...
/1
It began on Jan 13, 2021, after the US House of Reps impeached Trump for insurrection but before the Senate had voted. In a sanctimonious speech ...
/2
... Trump lectured the nation that “[t]here is never a justification for violence” and vowed to “bring to justice” the very people he had been inciting to violence for months. ...
/3
Judging from messages in Proud Boy Telegram channels, Nordean first reaction (6:17pm) was mild, tho he couldn’t believe his ears: “Ugh ... No excuse for violence? Ever? Nah I’m good.”
/4
As Trump’s words sank in, Nordean’s reaction was getting more visceral. “I get the narrative,” he says here, but then he mocks Trump’s words & feigns wretching.
/5
But then at noon on Jan. 20, 2021, Trump’s term ended. Trump had pardoned scores of people—but not Proud Boys. Nordean now fully grasped the betrayal.
At 2:28pm: “Fucking disgusting. I’m so pissed rn.”
/6
2:29pm: “What a load of shit that whole thing has been. All Trump did was get us to reveal ourselves to the enemy. Basically butt naked and unarmed against this new regime.”
/7
18 seconds later:
“Fuck Trump.
Fuck that cocksucker.”
/8
2:32pm: “We truly believed in that fucker, some guys are in jail because they followed him. ... I’m disgusted that I had such a loyalty to Trump & have lost everything for it. Fuck that guy.”
/9
2:39pm: “Alright I'm gunna say it. FUCK TRUMP! Fuck him more than Biden. I've followed this guy for 4 years and given everything and lost it all. ...”
/10
“...Now I've got some of my good friends and myself facing jail time ... So glad he was able to pardon a bunch of degenerates as his last move and shit on us on the way out. ...”
/11
“.... Fuck you trump you left us on the battle field bloody and alone.”
Fair enough. As more than one judge has suggested, these prosecutions of pawns are a travesty unless & until the king faces charges, too. I think Jack Smith gets that.
/12-end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Friday, in a 34-page unanimous ruling, the 1st Circuit denied govt a stay of Judge Young’s July 2 order declaring NIH’s cancellation of 100s of research contracts as “breathtakingly arbitrary & capricious.” Some interesting things...
If you recall, Judge Young found that DOGE had “force-fed” the cancellations to NIH, drafting cancellation letters, which no NIH scientist reviewed & which the NIH director approved “within [2] minutes”. ...
/2
DOGE’s template cancellation letter left blanks to be filled from a “reason-for-termination menu,” listing topics like “DEI,” “China,” “Transgender Issues,” “Climate Change.” Use of the menu was “mandatory.” ...
/3
A thread about DOJ’s astoundingly misleading responses to the 27-page Reuveni letter (since backed by 150pp of corroborating texts/emails) alleging conduct approaching contempt in 3 cases: JGG, Abrego, DVD.
Let’s examine @DAGToddBlanche’s & @AGPamBondi’s responses. ...
1/9
Reuveni’s letter says 5 others (but not Blanche) were at the 3/14/25 meeting where Bove allegedly said they “would need to consider” telling courts “fuck you.” In Blanche's denial, he claims he was present for whole meeting—but it appears he wasn’t. ...
/2
“I was at the meeting,” Blanche writes. But Blanche only poked his head in & left, Reuveni told NYT. Tellingly, Bove testified to Senate *not* that Blanche was present, but that Blanche *said* he was present. ...
/3
After today’s 5th Circuit argument in the Alien Enemies Act case WMM v Trump ( formerly AARP) it appeared that at least 2 of the 3 judges would approve the validity of Trump’s Alien Enemies Act proclamation. Unclear what due process they’ll afford targeted aliens. ...
1/6
... Judge Andrew Oldham (Trump appointee) doubted that a court could "countermand" virtually any aspect of Trump's decree. He even doubted that aliens had a right to deny their membership in Tren de Aragua, tho SCOTUS has said they do. ...
2/6
... Judge Leslie Southwick (GWBush) was tending toward adopting Judge Haines's (WDPenn) view. Haines found that the decree plausibly found a “predatory incursion” in light of Secy Rubio’s designation of TdA as a “foreign terrorist organization.” ...
3/6
Emil Bove, like Blanche on X, may be evading. Reuveni wrote than on 3/14 "Bove stated that DOJ would need *to consider* telling the courts "fuck you” and ignore any such court order." So it's true Bove didn't literally order anyone to violate court orders *at that meeting* 1/3
... & it’s also true that Reuveni, later that day, after speaking to DOJ colleague Flentje, felt momentarily reassured. But it's the events that followed--laid out in detail over 27 pages--that suggest that Bove's "fuck you" comment *was* eventually carried out. ... 2/3
... And I don't think anybody yet has denied that the "fuck you" comment was made. Maybe Bove will today. Maybe not. But there’s likely a text between Reuveni & Flentje referencing it when DOJ/DHS was, it seems, violating Judge Boesberg’s orders on 3/15.
/3-end
Tomorrow, at noon, Judge Farbiarz (DNJ) will hold a hearing on whether to release Mahmoud Khalil on bail. Khalil, in custody in Louisiana, requested the hearing 91 days ago. Since then at least 5 others similarly situated have all been released. Thread.
1/21
Khalil is a lawful permanent resident Columbia grad student who participated in Gaza protests. No criminal record. Palestinian. On 3/8 he was detained in his lobby in NYC as he returned with his US citizen wife, who was then 8-months pregnant. ...
/2
On 3/9, Khalil sued seeking release, alleging retaliation for 1st Amendment protected speech.
On 3/11 DHS told Khalil that the reason he was being removed was Secy Rubio’s finding that his presence in US had “serious adverse foreign policy consequences.” ...
/3
Hearing in Newsom v California, the national guard case, starting at 4:30pm ET. I'll try to live-blog for @lawfare , technology permitting. ... It's on Zoom, but I think the 1000 max has already been hit. ...
/1
Judge Charles Breyer on bench now.
Newsom v Trump
counsel giving appearances
Nicholas Green for state AG seems to be lead.
Brett Shumate from DOJ
/2
Judge: preliminary comments. reason it's necessary to have briefing is while it was initially styled ex parte proceeding, it was certainly not ex parte. there was cooperation between parties. wanted to make sure i had complete record to extent it can be achieved
/3