Roger Parloff Profile picture
Senior editor, Lawfare. Journalist. Ex-Fortune staff. Published in ProPublica, NYT, New York, New Yorker, Yahoo Finance, Air Mail, etc. rparloff on Threads.
65 subscribers
Nov 3 19 tweets 5 min read
I’ll unpack here my unintelligible thread from last night about Judge Howell’s ruling on the scope of the felony charge “obstruction of an official proceeding” (18 USC 1512c2) after Fischer v US. It impacts many Jan. 6 cases but has only minor impact on US v Trump, IMHO ...
1/18 ... The ruling concerns two Proud Boys, Nick DeCarlo & Nick Ochs, who pleaded guilty to 1512c2 in 2022 to satisfy an indictment alleging 2 felonies & 4 misdemeanors. After SCOTUS narrowed the scope of 1512c2 last June, they petitioned for release ...
/2
Oct 29 7 tweets 3 min read
NBC asks Judge Chutkan for right to televise US v Trump immunity determination hearings in DC, which "go to the strcuture of American democracy" & “may be [among] most important arguments ever made before any US court.” ...
/1 Image ... NBC argues that American public has "extraordinary interest" in seeing hearings involving allegations that Trump, "a current nominee for reelection to the Presidency, sought to destroy our nation's democracy for personal benefit." ...
/2 Image
Oct 27 16 tweets 6 min read
Regarding @WashingtonPost owner @JeffBezos’s blocking the paper’s endorsement of Kamala Harris, this thread aims to flesh out Trump’s history of attacks on Bezos & show how Trump’s past unchecked abuses are already chilling free speech ...
1/16
nytimes.com/2024/10/27/bus… ... In 2019, the cloud computing unit of Bezos’ Amazon, known as AWS, sued the Defense Dept. It alleged that Trump used “improper pressure” to steer a $10bn DoD contract away from AWS to punish Bezos for the Post’s tough coverage of him ... ...
/2 bit.ly/3YnbPDNImage
Oct 20 7 tweets 4 min read
DOJ must make a sensitive decision soon. On Thurs., accused would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh moved to recuse Judge Aileen Cannon in his case. Does DOJ oppose—undercutting notions of reassigning the US v Trump (MaL) case? Support? Take no position?
1/7
bit.ly/40iF6SmImage ... DOJ knows that criminal defs are constantly trying to judge-shop. Recusal standards are & need to be high. Trump himself has tried to recuse USDJs Chutkan (DC) & Kaplan (SDNY, in E Jean Carroll cases), as well as Engoron, Merchan, & Willis in state courts. ...
/2
Oct 18 19 tweets 7 min read
Judge Chutkan’s pithy line below is the definitive answer to Trump & critics (including @eliehonig & @lawfare’s own @jacklgoldsmith ) who’ve suggested that DOJ’s “60-day rule” militates against releasing the redacted appendix. I’ll return to Chutkan's line momentarily. ...
1/18 Image In a nutshell, Trump et al are wrong. The rule focuses on “overt investigative actions” or filing of charges. Trump’s DC indictment was filed on Aug 1, 2023, which was 462 days before the election. ...
/2
Oct 16 9 tweets 4 min read
In US v Trump (DC), the govt explained today why Fischer v US doesn’t require dismissal of the two obstruction-of-an-official-proceeding counts (18 USC 1512c2). Govt says Trump’s false elector scheme is “falsely creating evidence,” which SCOTUS said is still covered. ...
1/8 Image Remember that Fischer v US narrowed the definition of 1512c2. It now only reaches defendants who obstruct by try to impair the “integrity” or “availability” of docs or objects being used at a proceeding. Full explanation below: ...
/2

lawfaremedia.org/article/the-ju…
Oct 11 10 tweets 3 min read
I’ve wondered how SCOTUS’s Fischer ruling would impact early cooperating Oath Keepers & Proud Boys who pled guilty mainly to obstruction of an official proceeding (18 USC 1512c2), whose scope Fischer slashed. The case of Jon Ryan Schaffer offers a clue: Not much. ...
1/10 Image ... Schaffer (front man of heavy metal band Iced Earth) was a “founding lifetime member” of the Oath Keepers. In Apr 2021, he pled guilty—maybe first OK to do so. He cooperated & will finally be sentenced on 10/25. One of the 2 charges he pled to was 1512c2. ...
/2
Oct 6 11 tweets 5 min read
On 10/2, Judge Chutkan tried to curb Trump attys’ “political rhetoric” in court filings, calling it “unbecoming of experienced defense attys.” Some notes here on what’s happened since & some contrasts with Judge Cannon’s approach. ...
1/11 Image ... The day after Judge Chutkan’s order, Trump attys defied it. In a brief ostensibly about Fischer v US, they argued that Nancy Pelosi caused Jan 6, exonerating Trump; bemoaned “lawfare overreach”; & referred to DOJ twice as the “Biden-Harris DOJ.” ...
/2 Image
Image
Image
Image
Sep 29 12 tweets 5 min read
Odd new development in what I’ll call the “despite-Fischer cases”— the cases, including Trump’s DC case—where govt is pursuing a Jan. 6 defendant on 18 USC 1512c2 charges (obstruction of an official proceeding) despite SCOTUS’s Fischer ruling greatly narrowing that law. ...
1/10 ... It seems that DOJ is now just charging 1512c —*the entire section*—rather than specifying a subsection at all, like 1512c2 or 1512c1. This makes some sense, though I haven’t seen it done before. Will govt modify Trump’s DC indictment, too? We’ll see. Let me explain. ...
/2
Sep 26 13 tweets 4 min read
Some notes re the Haitian Bridge Alliance’s attempt to jump-start criminal charges against Trump & Vance for false statements re Springfield OH.
Tl:dr: Don’t expect arrest warrants. Still, an interesting judicial ruling might yet emerge from this.
1/13
bit.ly/4gDyTGn
Image Let’s put the (major) 1st Am obstacles aside & just focus first on what this OH procedure does & doesn’t do.
And before even doing that, two updates: HBA atty @SubodhChandra plans to file amended papers, maybe today, he says. ...
/2
Sep 20 5 tweets 2 min read
The first seven pages of Trump’s “reply” brief on discovery are actually a de facto motion to reconsider, begging Judge Chutkan to retract her 9/5 scheduling order, which calls for the govt to lay out its “unpled” evidence against Trump next Thurs, 9/26. ...
1/5 Image ... Trump’s motion to reconsider is based heavily on political considerations, which Chutkan has repeatedly said she will not entertain. Trump candidly seeks to escape an “invasive factual probe ... as the election rapidly approaches.” ...
/2 Image
Sep 14 5 tweets 2 min read
Surprised this hasn’t gotten more attention. During the debate, when Trump claimed (falsely) that on Jan. 6 “nobody on the other side was killed,” the “other side” he was talking about was the police & Congress. He also called the rioters “we” before he caught himself.
1/4 Image ... And yes, though it’s not my point, there were lots of false statements here. People on “the other side” *were* killed. Ofc Brian Sicknick, 42, had a stroke on Jan. 6, eight hours after being sprayed in the face with chemicals, & died Jan. 7. And ...
/2
Sep 10 11 tweets 5 min read
Belatedly reading a 2d strong amicus brief opposing Judge Cannon’s dismissal of US v Trump (MaL). Filed by former officials & law profs last week, including @gtconway3d & @tribelaw, it argues the merits but also seeks reassignment to a new judge. ...
1/11
bit.ly/47jDWaY
Image ... The brief’s lead atty, @Matt_Seligman, zeroes in on just one of the 4 statutes whose plain text, per govt, authorizes appt of special counsel Jack Smith. He vividly conveys the seemingly willful evasions Cannon executed to arrive at her anomalous result. ...
/2
Sep 5 66 tweets 12 min read
It’s Sep 5 and I’m at Prettyman US Courthouse in DC for today’s 10am hearing in US v Trump before Judge Tanya Chutkan. I’ll be live-tweeting for @lawfare from the media room, while colleague @annabower will be in the courtroom. ...
/1 Image Trump's attys & Special Counsel will be arguing over the timing & nature of the path forward after SCOTUS’s immunity ruling. This afternoon, at 4pm, @lawfare editor-in-chief Ben Wittes will interview @AnnaBower and me about today’s events. ...
/2

lawfaremedia.org/article/lawfar…
Sep 4 18 tweets 6 min read
A strong, shrewd amicus brief was filed yesterday in the appeal of Judge Cannon’s dismissal of US v Trump (MaL) for the AG’s alleged improper appt of Jack Smith. It urges reassignment to a new judge if the court reverses. I’ll encapsulate. ...
1/18
bit.ly/3Xecred
Image The brief was filed by @CREWcrew , ret. USDJ Nancy Gertner, & ethics profs Stephen Gillers & James S. Sample. What’s shrewd about it is what it doesn’t do. E.g., it never mentions who appointed Cannon. (Legal nonstarter & nobody needs to be told.) ...
/2
Sep 3 10 tweets 3 min read
Though it’s outside @lawfare’s bailiwick, readers have expressed interest in the E. Jean Carroll v Trump cases. The appeal of the verdict in the 1st case to go to trial, known as Carroll II (because it was filed 2d), will be heard Friday. Here’s an overview ...
/1 Fri.’s appeal concerns the May 2023 $5M verdict for sexual abuse & defamation. (Trump’s opening brief in the other case, Carroll I, is due 9/13. That’s the Jan. 2024 $83.3M verdict, for defamations in 2019 & 2023—the last one triggered by the Carroll II verdict.) ...
/2
Aug 30 5 tweets 2 min read
Now that Trump has purported to “remove” his NY prosecution to federal court again, does Justice Merchan have power to rule on Trump’s immunity motion &, if he denies it, to sentence Trump? My thoughts here, but I invite @lee_kovarsky or anyone else to correct me. ...
1/5
Under 28 USC 1455(b)(1) Trump’s filing is untimely ("after trial"). He hasn’t sought USDJ Hellerstein’s leave to file late, and Hellerstein hasn’t granted it, so maybe Merchan can just go ahead. In addition ...
/2 Image
Aug 30 15 tweets 5 min read
To comply with SCOTUS’ immunity ruling, SC Jack Smith’s superseder is conservative; it doesn’t push the envelope. That’s wise, but painful. I think the case survives, but SCOTUS has req’d suppression of highly probative evidence of grave crimes. ...
1/14 Two caveats: 1st, the cuts were not nec’ly Jack Smith’s decisions; DOJ was involved. 2d, it’s possible that stuff that was cut might resurface later, offered as “evidence” of unofficial acts. But not much, IMHO. A few tweets, maybe—if that. ...
/2
Aug 29 8 tweets 3 min read
When the govt files the “joint status report” tomorrow in US v Trump (DC), look for whether the govt is seeking Judge Chutkan’s preclearance of just the indictment or of *all* evidence it plans to present ...
1/8
... As my @lawfare colleagues explain below, the superseder scrubs the indictment of many official acts, but govt might yet try to resurface some purged allegations as evidence of the remaining *unofficial* acts for which Trump *can* be prosecuted. ...
/2

lawfaremedia.org/article/the-su…
Aug 22 7 tweets 3 min read
Because SCOTUS’s 6/28 ruling in US v Fischer narrowed the scope of 18 USC 1512c2 (obstruction of a proceeding), it’s important to find out if it’s still viable in Jan. 6 cases, in part because 2 of 4 charges in US v Trump (DC) are 1512c2 & conspiracy to commit it, 1512k. ...
1/7 Image ... DOJ is now pursuing at least 4 J6 defendants under 1512c2. All are rioters who riffled thru docs on Senators’ desks. Fischer requires proof that defs "impaired the availability or integrity for use in [a] proceeding of ... docs ... used in the proceeding,” or tried to. ...
/2
Aug 21 6 tweets 3 min read
Here’s the filing in which the govt commits, for the first time, to trying to prove that two Jan 6 defendants violated 18 USC 1512c2 (obstruction of an official proceeding) despite SCOTUS'S dramatic narrowing of that law’s scope in Fischer v US. ...

1/6 bit.ly/3Aw5Jsv
Image … Govt argues to USDJ Colleen Kollar-Kotelly that it can use the existing indictment but she must give this new jury instruction, requiring proof that defendants impaired the availability or integrity for use in a proceeding of records, documents, or objects. ...
/2 Image