Roger Parloff Profile picture
Senior editor, Lawfare. Journalist. Ex-Fortune staff. Published in ProPublica, NYT, New York, New Yorker, Yahoo Finance, Air Mail, etc. rparloff on BlueSky.
65 subscribers
Dec 18 8 tweets 4 min read
Here's what's known about the jury misconduct claim in People v Trump:
On 12/3 Trump attys wrote prosecutors alleging “grave juror misconduct” showing that “this case was not anywhere near fair & impartial.” Heavily redacted 7-page letter here:
...
1/8 bit.ly/4izTPPTImage ... Blanche asked for a redacted letter to be made public & that it be weighed in support of Trump’s pending motion to dismiss. But due to time constraints & privacy issues, he asked that it *not* be explored through “invasive fact-finding.” ...
2/8 Image
Dec 17 8 tweets 3 min read
In People v Trump yesterday, while Justice Merchan denied one of Trump’s motions, he revealed that there’s a new issue—an allegation of juror misconduct. Trump filed a nonpublic (& nonsworn) letter on that on 12/2. Nonpublic response & reply were filed 12/5 & 12/9 ...
1/8 Image ... Justice Merchan wants redacted versions of those letters made public, but also wants Trump to make sworn accusations, as NY law requires. Not clear to me if Trump has to make sworn accusations first before letters can be made public. ...
/2 Image
Image
Dec 5 14 tweets 5 min read
People are understandably confused about the status of the NY crim. case vs Trump. Justice Merchan must rule on 2 key Trump motions. Even if he denies both & tries to move to sentencing, Trump will try to block that by either federal injunction or appeal of the rulings ...
1/13 Image The 1st motion, filed 7/10, seeks a new trial, arguing that the DA introduced evidence of official acts barred by SCOTUS’ immunity ruling.
The 2d, filed 12/2, seeks dismissal based on “legal impediment” or “in furtherance of justice.” ...
/2
Dec 1 5 tweets 2 min read
In the FBI probe that led to the US v Trump classified docs case, a former Trump Adm witness identified as Person 16 described another former Trump Adm member, Person 24, as “unhinged” & “crazy.” Person 24 shares many traits of, and may be, Kash Patel. ...
1/4 Image Person 16 told the FBI, e.g., that Trump had no standing order to declassify the docs that were removed & no one would say otherwise with the possible exception of Person 24. (Patel has claimed that Trump did declassify the docs that were removed.) ...
/2 Image
Nov 20 13 tweets 4 min read
Here’s what DA Bragg (DANY) did yesterday in People v Trump, which is actually complicated. Requires understanding Trump’s position—which was also more fully revealed yesterday—& the weird & close-to-hopeless posture of case. ...
1/12 bit.ly/4ftTgF8Image ... As of the election, Trump was facing an 11/12 ruling by Justice Merchan on whether SCOTUS’s US v Trump immunity principles required a new trial (IMMUNITY QUESTION A) &, if not, sentencing on 11/26. But, on 11/8, Trump’s attys wrote DANY saying they’d ...
/2 Image
Nov 16 19 tweets 8 min read
Though late, I want to highlight the case of Zachary Alam, who was sentenced to 8 yrs on 11/7—tied for 16th longest prison term for a J6 defendant. His case shows how Trump’s election lies foreseeably impacted troubled individuals & led to the death of Ashli Babbitt. ...
1/16 Image ... On J6, Alam was almost 30. He had about 20 arrests, mainly drug or alcohol related. He’d graduated from UVa, but dropped out of osteopathic med school in 2015. His father then disowned him, per his mother. Eventually he was living out of a storage unit & his truck ...
/2 Image
Image
Nov 3 19 tweets 5 min read
I’ll unpack here my unintelligible thread from last night about Judge Howell’s ruling on the scope of the felony charge “obstruction of an official proceeding” (18 USC 1512c2) after Fischer v US. It impacts many Jan. 6 cases but has only minor impact on US v Trump, IMHO ...
1/18 ... The ruling concerns two Proud Boys, Nick DeCarlo & Nick Ochs, who pleaded guilty to 1512c2 in 2022 to satisfy an indictment alleging 2 felonies & 4 misdemeanors. After SCOTUS narrowed the scope of 1512c2 last June, they petitioned for release ...
/2
Oct 29 7 tweets 3 min read
NBC asks Judge Chutkan for right to televise US v Trump immunity determination hearings in DC, which "go to the strcuture of American democracy" & “may be [among] most important arguments ever made before any US court.” ...
/1 Image ... NBC argues that American public has "extraordinary interest" in seeing hearings involving allegations that Trump, "a current nominee for reelection to the Presidency, sought to destroy our nation's democracy for personal benefit." ...
/2 Image
Oct 27 16 tweets 6 min read
Regarding @WashingtonPost owner @JeffBezos’s blocking the paper’s endorsement of Kamala Harris, this thread aims to flesh out Trump’s history of attacks on Bezos & show how Trump’s past unchecked abuses are already chilling free speech ...
1/16
nytimes.com/2024/10/27/bus… ... In 2019, the cloud computing unit of Bezos’ Amazon, known as AWS, sued the Defense Dept. It alleged that Trump used “improper pressure” to steer a $10bn DoD contract away from AWS to punish Bezos for the Post’s tough coverage of him ... ...
/2 bit.ly/3YnbPDNImage
Oct 20 7 tweets 4 min read
DOJ must make a sensitive decision soon. On Thurs., accused would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh moved to recuse Judge Aileen Cannon in his case. Does DOJ oppose—undercutting notions of reassigning the US v Trump (MaL) case? Support? Take no position?
1/7
bit.ly/40iF6SmImage ... DOJ knows that criminal defs are constantly trying to judge-shop. Recusal standards are & need to be high. Trump himself has tried to recuse USDJs Chutkan (DC) & Kaplan (SDNY, in E Jean Carroll cases), as well as Engoron, Merchan, & Willis in state courts. ...
/2
Oct 18 19 tweets 7 min read
Judge Chutkan’s pithy line below is the definitive answer to Trump & critics (including @eliehonig & @lawfare’s own @jacklgoldsmith ) who’ve suggested that DOJ’s “60-day rule” militates against releasing the redacted appendix. I’ll return to Chutkan's line momentarily. ...
1/18 Image In a nutshell, Trump et al are wrong. The rule focuses on “overt investigative actions” or filing of charges. Trump’s DC indictment was filed on Aug 1, 2023, which was 462 days before the election. ...
/2
Oct 16 9 tweets 4 min read
In US v Trump (DC), the govt explained today why Fischer v US doesn’t require dismissal of the two obstruction-of-an-official-proceeding counts (18 USC 1512c2). Govt says Trump’s false elector scheme is “falsely creating evidence,” which SCOTUS said is still covered. ...
1/8 Image Remember that Fischer v US narrowed the definition of 1512c2. It now only reaches defendants who obstruct by try to impair the “integrity” or “availability” of docs or objects being used at a proceeding. Full explanation below: ...
/2

lawfaremedia.org/article/the-ju…
Oct 11 10 tweets 3 min read
I’ve wondered how SCOTUS’s Fischer ruling would impact early cooperating Oath Keepers & Proud Boys who pled guilty mainly to obstruction of an official proceeding (18 USC 1512c2), whose scope Fischer slashed. The case of Jon Ryan Schaffer offers a clue: Not much. ...
1/10 Image ... Schaffer (front man of heavy metal band Iced Earth) was a “founding lifetime member” of the Oath Keepers. In Apr 2021, he pled guilty—maybe first OK to do so. He cooperated & will finally be sentenced on 10/25. One of the 2 charges he pled to was 1512c2. ...
/2
Oct 6 11 tweets 5 min read
On 10/2, Judge Chutkan tried to curb Trump attys’ “political rhetoric” in court filings, calling it “unbecoming of experienced defense attys.” Some notes here on what’s happened since & some contrasts with Judge Cannon’s approach. ...
1/11 Image ... The day after Judge Chutkan’s order, Trump attys defied it. In a brief ostensibly about Fischer v US, they argued that Nancy Pelosi caused Jan 6, exonerating Trump; bemoaned “lawfare overreach”; & referred to DOJ twice as the “Biden-Harris DOJ.” ...
/2 Image
Image
Image
Image
Sep 29 12 tweets 5 min read
Odd new development in what I’ll call the “despite-Fischer cases”— the cases, including Trump’s DC case—where govt is pursuing a Jan. 6 defendant on 18 USC 1512c2 charges (obstruction of an official proceeding) despite SCOTUS’s Fischer ruling greatly narrowing that law. ...
1/10 ... It seems that DOJ is now just charging 1512c —*the entire section*—rather than specifying a subsection at all, like 1512c2 or 1512c1. This makes some sense, though I haven’t seen it done before. Will govt modify Trump’s DC indictment, too? We’ll see. Let me explain. ...
/2
Sep 26 13 tweets 4 min read
Some notes re the Haitian Bridge Alliance’s attempt to jump-start criminal charges against Trump & Vance for false statements re Springfield OH.
Tl:dr: Don’t expect arrest warrants. Still, an interesting judicial ruling might yet emerge from this.
1/13
bit.ly/4gDyTGn
Image Let’s put the (major) 1st Am obstacles aside & just focus first on what this OH procedure does & doesn’t do.
And before even doing that, two updates: HBA atty @SubodhChandra plans to file amended papers, maybe today, he says. ...
/2
Sep 20 5 tweets 2 min read
The first seven pages of Trump’s “reply” brief on discovery are actually a de facto motion to reconsider, begging Judge Chutkan to retract her 9/5 scheduling order, which calls for the govt to lay out its “unpled” evidence against Trump next Thurs, 9/26. ...
1/5 Image ... Trump’s motion to reconsider is based heavily on political considerations, which Chutkan has repeatedly said she will not entertain. Trump candidly seeks to escape an “invasive factual probe ... as the election rapidly approaches.” ...
/2 Image
Sep 14 5 tweets 2 min read
Surprised this hasn’t gotten more attention. During the debate, when Trump claimed (falsely) that on Jan. 6 “nobody on the other side was killed,” the “other side” he was talking about was the police & Congress. He also called the rioters “we” before he caught himself.
1/4 Image ... And yes, though it’s not my point, there were lots of false statements here. People on “the other side” *were* killed. Ofc Brian Sicknick, 42, had a stroke on Jan. 6, eight hours after being sprayed in the face with chemicals, & died Jan. 7. And ...
/2
Sep 10 11 tweets 5 min read
Belatedly reading a 2d strong amicus brief opposing Judge Cannon’s dismissal of US v Trump (MaL). Filed by former officials & law profs last week, including @gtconway3d & @tribelaw, it argues the merits but also seeks reassignment to a new judge. ...
1/11
bit.ly/47jDWaY
Image ... The brief’s lead atty, @Matt_Seligman, zeroes in on just one of the 4 statutes whose plain text, per govt, authorizes appt of special counsel Jack Smith. He vividly conveys the seemingly willful evasions Cannon executed to arrive at her anomalous result. ...
/2
Sep 5 66 tweets 12 min read
It’s Sep 5 and I’m at Prettyman US Courthouse in DC for today’s 10am hearing in US v Trump before Judge Tanya Chutkan. I’ll be live-tweeting for @lawfare from the media room, while colleague @annabower will be in the courtroom. ...
/1 Image Trump's attys & Special Counsel will be arguing over the timing & nature of the path forward after SCOTUS’s immunity ruling. This afternoon, at 4pm, @lawfare editor-in-chief Ben Wittes will interview @AnnaBower and me about today’s events. ...
/2

lawfaremedia.org/article/lawfar…
Sep 4 18 tweets 6 min read
A strong, shrewd amicus brief was filed yesterday in the appeal of Judge Cannon’s dismissal of US v Trump (MaL) for the AG’s alleged improper appt of Jack Smith. It urges reassignment to a new judge if the court reverses. I’ll encapsulate. ...
1/18
bit.ly/3Xecred
Image The brief was filed by @CREWcrew , ret. USDJ Nancy Gertner, & ethics profs Stephen Gillers & James S. Sample. What’s shrewd about it is what it doesn’t do. E.g., it never mentions who appointed Cannon. (Legal nonstarter & nobody needs to be told.) ...
/2