i'll never get over how skinny jeans have become so normalized, they're now worn by conservatives lamenting the decline of traditional masculinity.
you don't even have to go as far back as the early 2000s to see how this used to be taboo for men
in 2011, Levi's released their "ex-girlfriend jeans," which caused an uproar. many said the reference to women and skinny fit rendered men feminine/gay. this was part of a long convo about the "decline of masculinity."
Michele White dedicated a chapter on these jeans in her book
now one of the main voices around this political war is wearing jeans so skinny, his leg opening doesn't even cover the opening of his shoes. this would have been unthinkable 15 years ago, let alone around the turn of the 2000s.
should add: it's easier to feel comfy in skinny jeans now bc of synthetics. in 2011, guys wore this fit in pure cotton, and they were unforgiving. but even the use of synthetics was once taboo for men! stretch jeans were for women. now lots of guys wear stretch skinny jeans
the most amazing thing about this thread is that it has now attracted normal, non-fashion dudes and social conservatives who are now defending their skinny jeans. pretty amazing!!
conservatives in skinny jeans coming up to the mic to disagree
trying to be nice and assume that people either have not read this thread and/or perhaps are reading too quickly. nothing in this thread suggests that I'm against skinny jeans. i think they can be stylish if they fit your body type and style
i'm only pointing out the irony. 10 yrs ago, social conservatives hated skinny jeans as a sign of "low t, beta male hipsters" and a decline in traditional masculinity. now they wear the style while still lamenting the supposed decline in traditional masculinity.
First, which do you like better? Jake Paul's suit above or Stephen A Smith's lilac suit below?
Aside from the fact that one is double-breasted and the other is single-breasted, the biggest difference is length. IMO, Jake Paul's jacket is way too short for him.
Many people have heard the rule that a jacket should be long enough for your fingers to just curl the hem.
Fashion—or style, if you prefer—is not always about looking attractive. It's about expression. The single most powerful thing you can do to improve your style is giving up on the idea that dressing well is just about looking attractive, rich, or successful. 🧵
Once you give up on the idea that style is just about looking attractive, you'll feel freer to explore other aesthetics. For instance, the Japanese brand Kapital riffs on workwear, militaria, and folk clothing.
Their flagship product is a jacket that combines the US Army field jacket with the Japanese kimono. The thing looks totally ridiculous—and awesome. You're not really supposed to wear it with the hood up like you see in the second pic, but you could!!
At the moment, we don't know how much prices will go up as a result of tariffs. There are a lot of conditionals. But if the goal is raise the cost of imports so that people are encouraged to buy American-made goods, I want to tell you a story. 🧵
Some of you may remember American Apparel. They were huge with young, urban consumers (often called hipsters) in the early 2000s. The company was popular for their US-made basics, such as t-shirts and sweats, which they marketed through sexualized advertisements.
The company's fonder, Dov Charney, turned out to be a real creep. But during those early 2000s years, when US manufacturing was still a selling point in fashion, he promised a new way forward. You could make clothes in the US if you just made cool clothes, he argued.
I get this sort of comment a lot and it seems to stem from the presupposition that fashion images should be dominated by white men, and any deviation from this is some sort of woke DEI project. 🧵
With rare exceptions, I've never considered someone's ethnicity when posting a photo of a good or bad outfit. One exception that comes to mind is when I was critiquing Steve Harvey's suggestion that you can wear suit jackets as sport coats.
Some suggested that this is Black culture. IMO, it's more of a generational divide, so I took the opportunity to highlight two Black men I think are exceptionally stylish and know the difference between suit jackets and sport coats.
This is incorrect and shows how little the average person knows about garment manufacturing. 🧵
First, some context. This person imagines that Bad Clothing is made in low-cost countries like China and Mexico; Good Clothing is made in the US. So by putting up tariffs, we simply eliminate "cheap treats and slop."
Cheap t-shirts are already available in the US, they say.
My guess is that this person Googled "made in USA t-shirt" and screenshot the result. "Look how easy!"
But behind these country-of-origin tags, common mislabeling, and internet environment full of misinformation, there's a much more complex story.
The question is in response to a tweet where I said I think Chris Evans would look better in a larger and longer overcoat. This person is wondering whether a larger overcoat would work for their shorter frame. Good question!
When you are looking at clothes online, I encourage you to try to identify what exactly you like or dislike about an outfit. If we are talking about the silhouette, then identify the shape(s). I like long overcoats bc they create very long vertical lines. Shape is rectangular.