North Korea has launched an SRBM from a recently dug silo at the Sohae Space Launch Center. Some important implications:
North Korea is threatened with a myriad of fast or stealthy South Korean and American systems that can accurately strike targets in the DPRK in under five minutes. There are two possible solutions to this problem, and the DPRK is experimenting with both of them.
The first is mobility. You can put your missiles on trucks and drive them around making adversary targeting much more difficult, aiding the survivability of your missile systems, giving them time to retaliate.
The second is simply matching speed for speed. Solid-fueled missiles in silos are fast. No need to fuel them, they're already in launch position, all you need to do is press a button and they're off.
So now we have two adversaries on the peninsula, both experimenting with extremely fast missile systems, in the DPRK case, that are nuclear-capable, and both have plans to launch disarming first strikes against the other.
You should be able to start seeing the problem here. Silos also have the advantage that the adversary can't detect launch preparations. They can be launched with no warning.
If the DPRK deploys such a system at scale, the pressure for the ROK and US to strike first in a crisis will be immense, as will the DPRK's desire to maximize damage by striking with little warning.
Lastly, we should take note of how quickly the DPRK built this thing. They started breaking ground on the silo itself in late January. The deployment time is less than 60 days. That's really concerning.
It means that North Korea could build and deploy SRBM silos armed with nuclear missiles out in the northern parts of the country extremely quickly. They could also build a lot of decoy silos if they wanted, further complicating ROK/US targeting.
The bottom line here is that I think we are on the brink of seeing a pretty huge expansion in the DPRK nuclear SRBMs, presenting a lot of problems for the peninsula during a nuclear crisis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting article, with pictures, of one of the ROC's new anti-ship missile units. This one is in Hualien, at 24.039459°, 121.619632°. I have two observations:
Point one: the ROC protects critical sites with fixed hardened missile sites built into mountains. One base at Hetian Mountian south of Hualien is pretty well known. The ROC seems to have increasingly moved in the direction of mobile launchers instead recently.
The reasons are obvious: the PLA has plenty of munitions capable of destroying hardened sites. The mountain can't move, so once the enemy knows where you are, there's very little you can really do. Mobile launchers are going to be much more survivable.
1960s Soviet war films are great. I assume if you were a director you could just call up the Soviet Army and be like "hey can I borrow a tank division or two and dress them up in German uniforms? It's for a movie" and they'd be like "sure boss go for it"
"What if we also did some sick jumps with the T-34s were borrowing?"
If something appears on screen there is a 50% it will explode. It's great.
I have finished Andor and I am not exaggerating when I say it is possibly one of the best pieces of media about authoritarianism I think I've ever seen
It's also amazing that Disney let this get made in the way that it was considering its episode structure...entire episodes where nothing explodes solely dedicated to hammering home the idea that authoritarianism is inescapable no matter what you do or where you go
The way portrayed how authoritarian states function and the fact that such states will throw you aside if the bureucracy demands it was also great.
The 2022 CMPR is out. Let's go through it! I mostly agree with the assessment, with some caveats:
The table of launchers and missiles is interesting. DoD now counts some of the new silos as deployed launchers, but not all. If DoD was counting all, the number would be closer to 400. I assume that DoD is judging some of the new silos to be finished or close to it.
We should expect next year's table to show ~400-450 launchers. My latest assessment counting all liquid and solid-fueled silos under construction and deployed would put the number around ~385+, and I'm probably missing some DF-5 silos under construction somewhere.
A couple of thoughts datapoints on this thread: first, It's very possible we know the name of this TEL: the HTF5700HEV, which they showed us two years ago. When they showed us this vehicle, it operated in tandem with a DF-17 TEL.
Two observations that make this vehicle more likely to be a transporter/reloader than a TEL IMO: first, as I pointed out in a previous thread, the vehicle doesn't appear to have any stands that would allow for the launching of a ballistic missile.
Second observation: the vehicle's cab only has two doors. Every other PLARF TEL has four doors to accommodate a full launch crew and store the equipment and computer consoles needed to launch a missile. This TEL doesn't have that space.