None of the emerging narratives surrounding the NS pipeline bombing really contradicts Seymour Hersh’s central allegation that Biden authorized the operation
The above findings were partly based on the work of @OAlexanderDK who recently published 2 substack articles on the Russian, Danish, German & US Navy movements near the pipelines in 2022
Radar target visibility range due to horizon for Danish Scanter 4000 on Bornholm & estimated location of nearest Swedish coastal radar
Coincidentally, North NS sabotage sites just outside Danish radar’s detection range
439. My reaction?
They try to pin the blame on Russia, alleging that its naval exercise near the blast sites was used as cover for the Project 141S Rescue ship SS-750 to use its AS-26 Project 1855 Priz Deep-Diving Rescue Vehicle to lay the charges
This is speculation not fact
440. For example
"Arguably the most important ship in the operation was submarine support ship SS-750. Its special feature: Project 1855 a deep-submergence rescue vehicle named AS-26 with gripper arms that can move cargo weighing up to 50 kg underwater"
However @tonline@OAlexanderDK@JMuellerToewe@janzegal do not pay the same attention to the capabilities of the US Navy ships in the area, nor the Danish Navy, nor Swedish HSwMS Visby, nor Polish & Rekin-22 Ships.
Instead they focus only on the Russian Ships
442. Two Russian Navy links
Archived to make them available to non VPN users
Swimmers of the special forces detachment of the Baltic Naval Base performed underwater firing
Denmark Asks Nord Stream 2 to Help Identify Object
The Danish Energy Agency has invited Swiss-based NS 2 AG to participate in an operation to lift an unknown object found next to the damaged gas link in the Baltic Sea.
"13 federal police officers inspected the yacht on Jan 18th 2022..We know Danish police are really smart, did they anticipate the CIA wanting to make up a yacht story 3.5 months later ?"
454. What Hersh actually said (summary)
After a visit by Olaf Scholz to Biden (March 3), US & German intelligence agencies fed @nytimes & @DIEZEIT false cover stories to counter the report that Biden & US were responsible for the pipelines' destruction
"Moscow claims Germany, Denmark, and Sweden are engaged in a U.S.-backed cover-up, as the war to control the narrative — and the evidence — intensifies"
"An American journalist, who has become quite famous now in the world, conducted an investigation & came to the conclusion that the gas pipelines explosion were organised by US special services. I fully agree with these conclusions"
"I believe that it will be hard to attain this (the truth about the Nord Stream incident - TASS), but someday it will probably come out for sure what was done and how,"
"I do not think it makes sense for us to get into that now, since one of the NATO countries, or Denmark, told us they had already examined it, which means the situation is not explosive"
"ORP Orzeł is one of the 3 Navy submarines It can submerge to a depth of up to 300m, has six torpedo launchers with the ability to "erect" (sic) sea mines"
I am taking a look at NATO & allied nations' naval activity mainly because I noticed OSINT analysts are drawing attention to Russian Naval Activity around the NS pipeline blast sites in Sep 2022 (& on other occasions).
What's good for the goose is good for the gander!
467. Interesting thread by @MichaKobs which dissects the claims of @oalexander about a group of Russian Ships in late Sept 2022 & ends by throwing suspicion on HSwMs Visby, a Swedish corvette operating in stealth mode near the blast sites.
1 of his earlier claims that 1st NS2 explosion was likely "just an accident" due to poor welding (which mysteriously became a subscriber only article) has now been well & truly deleted.
About the activity in the Baltic of the Russian SS-750 rescue ship, Ufa submarine & 2 rescue submersibles AS-26 & AS-30, some of which were allegedly operating near site of NS explosions in late 2022
"Mats Ljungqvist does not want to give any forecast when the investigation may have any answers or straighten out the question marks surrounding the central questions"
James Bamford @WashAuthor writes a detailed analysis in @thenation "on the greatest whodunit of the century", pointing the wise finger of suspicion at Ukraine and Poland.
You can listen to @WashAuthor discussing his findings on Talk World Radio (You Tube)
James Bamford on Israelgate and Nordstream
487. Integrated Undersea Surveillance System (1)
"Given that the US has long had the seafloor of the Baltic secretly bugged, with the ability to identify and geolocate passing vessels, combined with the presence of reconnaissance planes within a few hours of the explosions"
488. Integrated Undersea Surveillance System (2)
"it is highly likely that the US knows far more about what happened &who is responsible, than it is revealing"
Bamford should know!
"For 30 years, James Bamford obsessively documented the secretive NSA"
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.
This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!
The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!
What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place