There’s always a constant struggle between the #Government and you the citizen. The larger the government, smaller the citizen. Governments tend to get larger with time increasing their powers, increasing their departments and spending.
From time to time government declassifies it’s hidden data completely blocking out vital information. It’s as if you see nothing #GovernmentDeclassify
Government regularly works with big Pharma and hides their drug trial data like they agreed to hide the data for 75 years. They… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Every dollar your government spends is from the taxpayer. Every politician & public official salary comes from the taxpayer. Every year budget shows whether they spend more or less than what they receive. US government has already pushed the nation into $32 trillion in debt.
Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:
🚩A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:
- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.
- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.
🚩Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:
- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.
- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.
- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.
🚩A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:
- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.
- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.
- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.
🚩A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:
- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.
- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.
- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.
In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being.
Here are 10 arguments proving that climate change is a giant hoax to perpetuate the climate spending from innocent taxpayers:
1. Historical Climate Variability: Climate has always changed naturally over time, citing periods like the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age as evidence that current changes are within historical norms, not caused by human activity.
2. Inaccuracies in Climate Models: Climate models have failed to predict certain trends or events accurately, suggesting that these models might exaggerate the impact of CO2 or other greenhouse gases.
3. Urban Heat Island Effect: Temperature increases recorded in urban areas are due to more concrete and less vegetation, not global warming, thus skewing global temperature data.
4. Benefits of CO2: There's an argument that CO2 is beneficial for plant growth, essentially acting as plant food, which could lead to greener Earth and higher crop yields, countering negative effects.
5. Economic Motive for Climate Tax: The suggestion here is that the push for climate change action is more about creating a new tax revenue stream for governments rather than environmental protection. This tax, they claim, would disproportionately affect the poor and small businesses.
6. Manipulation of Data: Climate data has been manipulated or selectively reported to fit a narrative, like the "Climategate" controversy where emails suggested scientists might have withheld data or adjusted it to support their conclusions.
7. Natural Solar Cycles: Changes in solar activity, like sunspots or solar cycles, correlate more closely with Earth's temperature changes than CO2 levels do, suggesting solar influence over human influence.
8. Lack of Consensus: There's significant disagreement within the scientific community about the extent and cause of climate change.
9. Previous Doomsday Predictions: most of the past environmental predictions about population growth, resource depletion, or pollution that didn't materialize as predicted, suggesting current climate predictions might also be exaggerated or wrong.
10. Geopolitical Control: Climate change fears are used by global elites or organizations like the IMF, UN, WEF and WHO to push for more centralized control over national policies, economies, and personal behaviors through mechanisms like carbon credits or emission treaties.
Governments have made endless wars possible through Fiat money inflation. With nothing backing the money they print, all they need is lies and propaganda to start more wars and print more money to fix that’s destroyed.
It’s a never ending cycle…. Unless we stop it.
Argument for Taxation Enabling War:
1. Funding Mechanism: Taxation provides governments with the necessary funds to finance military operations. Without a steady income from taxes, nations would struggle to maintain standing armies, develop military technology, or sustain prolonged conflicts. Historical examples, like the British taxation of the American colonies to fund imperial wars, illustrate how tax revenues directly fuel military capabilities. The ability to tax gives states the financial muscle to engage in warfare, thereby making war not just possible but also more extensive and prolonged than it might otherwise be.
2. Public Support and Legitimacy: Taxation also serves as a tool for garnering public support or at least compliance for war efforts. When citizens pay taxes, they are indirectly invested in the state's ventures, including military actions. This financial contribution can be spun into a narrative of shared national interest or defense, legitimizing the war in the eyes of the populace. For instance, during wartime, governments might increase taxes or introduce war bonds, linking the financial burden directly to the war effort, thereby fostering a sense of collective responsibility and urgency.
Argument for War Leading to Increased Taxation:
1. Economic Strain and Recovery: Wars are immensely costly, draining national resources and often leading to economic downturns. Post-war recovery, rebuilding infrastructure, and providing for veterans require significant funds, which governments then seek through increased taxation. The aftermath of World War II, where many countries raised taxes to rebuild, exemplifies this cycle. War thus sets a precedent for higher future taxation to address the economic fallout from military conflict.
2. Military-Industrial Complex: War stimulates the military-industrial complex, creating a demand for continuous military spending. This spending, in turn, necessitates higher taxes to support an ever-growing defense budget. The cycle of war leading to more war can perpetuate a need for increased taxation to fund new military endeavors, technological advancements, and the maintenance of military bases worldwide. This was evident during the Cold War, where the arms race between superpowers led to significant tax increases to support military spending.
Both arguments highlight a symbiotic relationship where taxation and war feed into each other, creating a cycle of financial and military escalation.