9 years in the making, yesterday's #IPCC 6th assessment report synthesises a 6000-page (?) summary of climate and related sciences, and is arranged around 18 'headline statements'
I'm going to try and summarise it in 18 plain-language tweets 😬
1/ By burning stuff & emitting gasses we’ve DEFINITELY heated the world by 1.1C, but we haven’t stopped doing it. Wealthy countries and individuals have contributed much more to the problem, so we’re not equally to blame
2/ This has already had massive impacts on the weather, the oceans and the living world, everywhere on Earth. These changes have been catastrophic for people and nature, but those who have contributed least to the problem are the ones paying most of the costs
1/ This is a tale about some strange goings on in the UK courts
It starts with some friends of mine, the ‘BEIS 9’ scientists from @ScientistsX prosecuted for protesting the government’s fossil fuel-heavy energy strategy theconversation.com/extinction-reb…
2/ In April last year, we pasted scientific papers to Department of Energy (BEIS) building, and nine scientists glued themselves to it. They were arrested
In the thread below, several of these scientists explain why they were willing to face arrest
Here’s a story (an allegory?) for climate/nature communicators, about the Yale psychologist Howard Leventhal's work in the 1960s
He was interested in how fear affected people’s attitudes and behaviour, so he conducted an experiment
🧵1/11
He put together a booklet on the importance of tetanus inoculations, and asked students to evaluate it. To test the effects of fear, he made two versions
A high-fear version, fully of grizzly descriptions and illustrated with gory victim photos, and a low-fear version 2/
Unsurprisingly, students reacted differently to the two versions. High-fear readers suffered more tension, anxiety, nervousness and discomfort, as well as fear
They were also more likely to say inoculations are important, and expressed stronger intentions to get jabbed 3/
It has been a massive week for scientific activism, with a series of major actions by @ScientistRebel1 in Germany, and a court case for members of @ScientistsX in the UK
The key take home is that “ the recent past is not a reliable guide to future change, and that conservation must look to the future if it is to successfully anticipate and mitigate biodiversity loss” 2/n
Our paper is a response to a recent policy perspective by Caro et al. , which used historical trends to conclude that there is 'an inconvenient misconception' in conservation biology that climate change is a key driver of species loss 3/n conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…