2. On sovereignty, they said: “Northern Ireland remains subject to the power and control of EU law, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) and EU administrative organs (such as the European Commission) in respect of goods and ancillary matters."
3. The star chamber questioned whether so-called easings on checks will benefit companies in anything but a limited fashion and warn that small companies in particular will struggle to benefit from them.
4. “Future deregulatory efforts in the UK, e.g. under the Retention of EU Law Bill, will call into question whether new checks will be required, triggering a fresh negotiation.”
And added that the deal could push governments to simply comply with EU rules.
5. “These arrangements amount to limited & specific relaxations in EU law applicable to VAT & excise in NI, but they fall well short of restoring to the UK the right of an independent country to decide on its tax structures & set its tax rates as it might wish across the country”
6. #WindsorFramework 'continues to accept the reach of EU State aid law and the jurisdiction of the EU Commission and the ECJ, not just over Northern Ireland but also over the whole of the UK.'
7. The lawyers dismissed the Stormont Brake supposedly available for the Northern Ireland Assembly as an already failed model.
They pointed out that a similar deal offered to Norway in 2011 collapsed by 2013 because it was unworkable.
8. Conclusion:
• EU law will still be supreme in NI;
• The rights of its people under the 1800 Act of Union are not restored;
• the ‘green lane’ is not really a ‘green lane’ at all;
• the Stormont Brake is practically useless;
• the #Windsorframework has no easy exit.
💥
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Heath: 'Sunak also massively oversold his agreement. The document in which he gives his version of what has been achieved is almost unrecognisable to the EU’s own explanation. His claim that 1,700 pages of EU law are “disapplied” is false.'
2. The Windsor Framework’s changes to the Protocol are cosmetic: the EU has made a series of practical concessions to alleviate certain, narrowly defined problems, but these can be withdrawn at any time.
3. 'EU will accept “green lanes’’ and the (obvious) principle that the single market isn’t automatically “placed at risk” in the absence of extreme border checks or bans on medicines. It was despicable that they didn’t agree to this from the start,..
Farr: 'The PM can rely on lazy MPs and journalists to skim the government’s blatantly misleading Way Forward “explainer” instead of reading ... the legal text… to find that every single word of the Windsor Framework is new European law.'
2. 'There is nothing for Parliament to debate, because the Windsor Framework is being implemented in Brussels through ten new EU laws. The only consent in the UK – after a 90-minute debate – will be on a Statutory Instrument to insert the “Stormont Brake” into the NI Act.'
3. 'This will allow the EU to usurp parliamentary sovereignty and impose EU Regulations solely applicable in the UK, because it is the European Parliament which will get to vote on the new laws to govern trade within the UK’s internal market.'
Barrrett: 'The Windsor Framework is not a ‘compromise’ to bring an end to Brexit – it is the transfer of control to the EU. Some things cannot be compromised on – no matter how hard people try. The UK can either govern itself or let the EU do it.' spiked-online.com/2023/03/20/the…
2. 'Windsor Framework, Sunak’s renegotiated version of the NIP, gives the EU control of NI and by extension, control of the UK. It essentially torpedoes the UK-EU trade agreement, destroying any notion of a relationship between equals, and it returns the UK to law-taker status.'
3.'The law cannot be compromised. Someone always wins and someone always loses. In the case of the Windsor Framework, the conflict is over which legal system will govern the UK. There are only two answers here: ours or the EU’s. Under the framework as it stands, the EU will win.'
The Windsor Framework has been grossly misrepresented by the UK government to disguise that it has agreed to implement in full checks on GB-NI trade which have not been enforced under the grace periods
2. It has also agreed to grant rights under EU law for the EU to be consulted on UK goods & tax legislation so the EU can monitor potential competition risks with its SM. This is not needed for NIP operation but is an EU demand specifically excluded in earlier negotiations.
3. The legal objectives of the Protocol was to avoid a hard border and protect the Belfast Agreement.
However, it is clear that the Sunak government has colluded with the EU to develop the Windsor Framework as a vehicle for alignment with, and even subjection to, new EU laws.
1. 'Debriefing the European Parliament’s Brexit committees on the “Windsor Framework”, Maros Sefcovic said the [Sunak’s] pact was simply designed to avoid negative headlines in the British press, and would not hand back full sovereignty over the region.'
2. “This [Stormont Brake] is very much limited in the scope, and it's really under very strict conditions,” Mr Sefcovic told them, according to a recording obtained by The Telegraph.
3. “If we don't feel the third parties perspective, we will have the possibility to take limited remedial measures because we can tell them it's affecting the functioning of our single market."
A short thread on Taxes.
There are surprisingly few higher rate taxpayers in the UK. In 2021/22 a mere 563,000 people paid the additional 45% rate, that is only 1.7% of all UK taxpayers and about 0.8% of the UK population.
2. But despite making up such a small part of the population the additional rate taxpayers are expected to pay 36% of all income tax in 2022/23, (£89.2bn out of £251 billion). The economy relies on the tax contribution of this tiny proportion of the population.
3. If they left the country, we would all have to pay a lot more tax or get used to much lower levels of public services. There is a lot of competition for high earning individuals.