Yesterday we sent a series of questions to this shady new Omidyar-funded group @resetdottech -- whose report AP blindly swallowed to claim "pro-Russia accounts" were behind concerns over the Biden Admin's response in East Palestine. They're the most basic questions. No answers:
https://twitter.com/anthonyzenkus/status/1637802956262088704
Since employees of media corporations instructed their small but loyal herds to ignore the #TwitterFiles, they may not know that Bill Kristol already pulled this scam with "Hamilton68": what he claimed was a secret list of "pro-Kremlin accounts" that shaped countless headlines. 
When Omidyar funded the Intercept at the height of our Snowden reporting, his main cause was press freedom. He did it to empower our reporting (and others) free of state persecution.
Since 2016, his obsession became Russiagate, so he funds a "disinformation" industry about that.
Since 2016, his obsession became Russiagate, so he funds a "disinformation" industry about that.
As I've said many times, Omidyar never once interfered in the editorial output of TI. I constantly attacked his pet causes and beliefs, and he not only never impeded it but told me I was free to continue.
The problem is managers know why he funds, and they adapt to his beliefs.
The problem is managers know why he funds, and they adapt to his beliefs.
The fact that this entire scam, fraudulent industry of fake "disinformation experts" is funded by 2 liberal billionaires (Omidyar and Soros), together with the US/UK/EU security state, is a huge problem since it's designed to censor dissent from their agenda as "disinformation."
The reason TI degraded into an outpost of DNC talking points and Russiagate insanity isn't because Omidyar demanded it. It's because top editors (Betsy Reed, Roger Hodge) got huge salaries and were petrified they'd lose it unless they promoted his views. That's how it works.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
