TLDR: I like looking at data. So I have crunched A LOT of education-related data in Arkansas. With LEARNS threatening "failing" schools with charter school takeovers, I was curious what factors contribute to a schools failing or succeeding according to the data. A thread..🧵1/
This 🧵 will only show a small bit. If you want to view this information in detail, visit this link: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
This screenshot shows how I determined the combined district grades. There would be too much data to process to look at individual schools. 2/
I checked for correlations between the districts' grades and various educational data points. This screenshot shows some of the positive correlations to things that show a positive impact on a district's combined grade.
Important Note: CORRELATION DOES NOT PROVE CAUSATION 3/
This shows some more correlations, now moving into the negative correlations. Those correlations mean as the percentage or value of the data point increases, then it shows a negative impact on a district's grade. View the entire spreadsheet here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d… 4/
This shows some of the correlations between district grades and various factors over the last 5 years.
The state has SO MUCH DATA that it is impossible to download all of it from its website without locking down its system. Check for yourself. 5/ myschoolinfo.arkansas.gov/Plus/Schools
Conclusions: 1. LEARNS and other acts/bills this #arleg session REDUCES req's to become teachers. The data shows these exemptions NEGATIVELY impact student learning. 2. LEARNS does not REWARD teacher exp or adv degrees, both show a positive impact.
6/
3. Retaining students NEGATIVELY impacts schools. 4. Schools w/ more financial freedom do better. 5. Dictating how schools must spend funds from state or federal sources correlate negatively. 6. The worst-performing districts don't have "school choice" options available.
7/
7. LEARNS doesn't prevent teacher burnout or turnover. It likely makes these worse! These both contribute negatively to learning outcomes. 8. Socioeconomic (using free/reduced lunch %) reasons have THE BIGGEST negative impact on learning and is NOT addressed in LEARNS!
8/
Look through the data. See if you can find any other interesting tidbits or conclusions. The analysis definitely raises some questions that could warrant future investigation.
Let me know what stands out to you, or questions, or comments, or concerns.
9/
It is OBVIOUS the #arleg didn't look at the data that teachers and administrators live and know anecdotally before pushing LEARNS into law.
This is a massive breach of public trust! LEARNS is destined to join the massive pile of failed education initiatives & policies. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I feel humbled by the amount of attention my tweets have received in the last month or so. But I feel I owe everyone an introduction, because I went from no one to an outspoken voice speaking against Arkansas LEARNS.
Hello, I am Trevor McGarrah (rhymes with 🚗).
A 🧵... 1/
Twitter used to be my safe place to catch up on news, education, technology, video games, & the Arkansas Razorbacks. I might retweet things, but that was basically it.
I teach high school computer science and am constantly on the lookout for new educational technology tools. 2/
When ChatGPT came online in November, I immediately saw a HUGE disruptive force for education, and it made me excited. So I started becoming a little more active on Twitter.
Politics was not even on my radar in November, December, or even January. 3/
Arkansas LEARNS is praised by some as the magic cure for the problems facing public education. The sound bites and fluff pieces sound good to the uninformed.
School choice. Teacher raises. The biggest, boldest education reform ever.
But wait! Not so fast!
A thread... 🧵 1/
In a previous thread, I shared some data analysis I performed to discover what makes some school districts in the state successful while others fail. I used data provided by the Arkansas Department of Education.
After sharing the observations yesterday, I took a short break. Once I was rested with fresh eyes, I was ready to take a closer look at the data. As I did so, some stark differences became clear between the districts I am calling the HAVES and the HAVE NOTS.
3/
I read most parts of the Arkansas LEARNS bill a couple of times and some things stood out to me. While the whole thing isn't bad, holding good ideas hostage in a giant omnibus bill is reckless! Here is a quick list of my concerns in simple terms (not in order). A 🧵... 1/
New teachers in poor districts get an immediate $14k raise. Some teachers in those districts have taught 20+ years and still don’t make $50k…so they will get a small bump, but not proportional to the pay bump for new teachers. Definitely not fair to those veteran teachers. 2/
Teachers already over $50 only get $2k. After that, no guaranteed pay raises. No cost of living adjustments. Ever! The bonus is tied to some magic formula not fully defined in the bill. Bonuses get taxed at a higher rate and are unpredictable on if you’ll qualify. 3/
The future of education in the world of #ChatGPT will look more like a movie set with each student becoming a director, rather than them being passive spectators at the opening premiere of a movie. Let me explain in the next 17 tweets. #AI#FutureOfEducation
1. In a traditional classroom, students are talked to and told what to do. It is a game of compliance with points given for how closely each student gets to the predefined outcome. It is uninspiring. After all, they can find the answers in 5 seconds.
2. Most of schooling is built around instilling knowledge that already exists in the world. It is true that everyone needs some baseline knowledge as a framework, but we spend too much time teaching knowledge-based learning outcomes because they are testable.