Hey, folks! Want to hear from California legislators on how to solve the state's affordable housing crisis via new legislation? @HACdotorg, @cayimby, @gbeltalliance and @yimbyaction have you covered!

Sign up below, or follow along here! 🧵

actionnetwork.org/events/afforda…
First up is Assemblymember @BuffyWicks: says we need $100B over the next 10 years for affordable housing, which is why she's introduced a new housing bond.

"This issue has metastasized into such a crisis that we have to grapple with that."
Asm. Wicks continues, talking about starting the select committee on social housing! Says we need all ideas on the table.

"We put people on the moon, we can solve homelessness if we want to. We just need the political will."
Asm Wicks: there are things we can't control, like interest rates. But there are things we can control, like regulatory barriers.

Says we need CEQA reform, is authoring a bill responding to the UC Berkeley case exempting people's voices from being considered an enviro impact.
Asm. Wicks on labor issues: "Saying no is no longer an option. It's off the table. And I think we can do that, and protect workers at the same time."

(via requiring prevailing wage provisions)
Asm. Wicks on local control: it's important that cities be active participants in being part of the solution. It's a unifying issue, and she applauds the Governor/Attorney General and the DOJ Housing Strike Force.

Says some cities are good actors, shouting out Emeryville.
Next up is housing king @Scott_Wiener! He starts off praising @BuffyWicks, says that she "continually helps light a fire under me."

Sen. Wiener: "I'm so excited by this entire movement, because we're winning. We've completely shifted the narrative over the last decade."
Sen. Wiener talking about his bills #SB4 and #SB423, which despite opposition from the California Labor Federation and Building Trades, which in the past would've killed the bills, passed overwhelmingly through their first committee yesterday!

Says a sea change is happening.
On the topic of building new housing in exclusionary areas, Sen. Wiener touts #SB4, which allows faith communities/religious institutions to sidestep zoning regs to build affordable housing on their land.

Says studies show this land is disproportionately in high-income areas.
On CEQA reform, Sen. Wiener says it's one of the hardest things to attempt in California politics.

Shouts out the Planning & Conservation League's efforts on the enviro side years ago, that he's working on it and it needs to happen, but that it's extremely difficult.
On new bill #SB83, Sen. Wiener discusses a weird issue exacerbating the housing crisis: PG&E and other utilities are taking an inordinately long time to actually hook up new housing projects to the grid.

His bill will create deadlines for the utilities to hold them accountable.
On local control: it's a system designed to fail. We've tried it for 50 years, and it obviously hasn't worked.

"We have created a mess. It's time to fix it. It's not about demonizing elected officials. Hate the game, not the player. The game we've set up is terrible."
Continuing on local control, Sen. Wiener likens housing policy to education policy.

Says he would be correctly laughed out of the room if he proposed allowing local jurisdictions to do whatever they wanted on eduction, which is how housing works now. That has to change.
Sen. Wiener had to leave early, but his legislative analyst Tate is answering more questions.

On #SB4, he says 200 individual organizations supporting the bill thus far, especially faith groups. Says it could unlock thousands of affordable homes in high income communities.
Last in the housing all-star lineup is Assemblymember @alex_lee!

Asm. Lee says he's here tonight about his social housing proposal, #AB309. We start with a picture of social housing project Alt Erlaa in Vienna, and folks, it's gorgeous. Image
Asm. Lee says while it's important to reform the market to allow more housing to be built that way, we should also allow the state to create housing.

His idea is to have a public developer that could build mixed use, mixed income housing near transit where everyone can live.
Asm. Lee says that in addition to Europe, Asia, and South America, which already successfully build social housing, we do it here at home in California -- look no further than the UC system!

Highlights UC Irvine and UC San Diego specifically as good examples of what's possible.
Asm. Lee says a main tenet of social housing is that everyone should be able to live there, rich or poor, and that we have to do away with means-testing.

Says no one should be able to tell your economic status by the home you live in.
Some specifics on how #AB309 would actually work! Image
A few wrap up questions about Asm. Lee's land value taxation and single-stair study bills, and we're out! Thanks for following along!

The webinar was recorded, so DM me if you'd like a link when it's out (likely in a few days).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jordan Grimes 🚰

Jordan Grimes 🚰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cafedujord

Mar 25
Happy Saturday, folks! It's been a minute, but I'm back once again to bring you the (best?) of statewide NIMBY group Livable California.

Today's discussion will feature updates on new state housing legislation that they're mad about.

As always, grab some🍿, 🧵starts here!
I tuned in a little late, and hopped in during the middle of some complaining about courts upholding housing laws, as well as the Washington State Supreme Court upholding a new tax on capital gains.

Lol, lmao, etc.
Per LCA President Rick Hall, the org has supported 10 bills, opposing 8.

A while ago, the org figured out they needed to start supporting stuff so as to not be written off completely. Hasn't really worked though.

Here's a link to their letters.
drive.google.com/drive/folders/… Image
Read 30 tweets
Mar 23
Evening, folks. I'm currently attending a community meeting on an interim housing project via Project Homekey for unhoused residents in the Bay Area suburb of Santa Clara.

Previous meetings have been extremely heated. There are nearly 400 people in the Zoom. 🧵starts here!
A summary of all the concerns thus far. And there are...many. Chief among them: safety and property values. Image
Staff says that some of the biggest complaints have been about height, and whether or not the project could have fewer units. This is apparently being explored.

☹️
Read 48 tweets
Jan 25
Tonight in San Mateo, city staff is recommending adoption of our housing element, despite the fact that it hasn't been certified by @California_HCD.

The element doesn't meet state standards. This is a 100% bad faith attempt to try and avoid the builder's remedy.
There are a million problems with the element, including:

- severely deficient AFFH and constraints analyses
- no rezoning
- no mitigations for our 5 story 50 unit/acre height + density limits, despite it being listed as a major constraint to affordable housing
Staff just acknowledged HCD wants to see "firmer commitments from the city.

The city's comments on Measure Y, our height + density limits, were around holding "community conversations" to "build consensus" around a possible ballot measure to overturn it.

Not exactly firm!
Read 12 tweets
Nov 16, 2022
Evening, folks! I'm currently attending a council meeting in the city of Santa Clara, the Bay Area suburb home to the 49ers.

The topic? A 100% low-income housing project replacing a parking lot.

Tensions are high, and opposition is out in force. 🧵
Some background on Santa Clara: the city has a median home price (per zillow) of $1.6M, and a median household income of almost $140,000.

Between 2010 and 2019, they added nearly 30,000 jobs, but just 6,500 homes.
The project includes 106 deeply affordable (between 30-60% of AMI) homes, many of which are 2-3bds, something that is uncommon. The building itself is 5 stories, which is a major point of contention.
Read 50 tweets
Oct 29, 2022
Morning, folks! As usual, I'm covering a meeting of statewide NIMBY group Livable California.

Today's speaker is a former councilmember from the tiny Bay Area city of Albany, here to complain about their state mandated housing (RHNA) numbers, a fight Livable already lost.

🍿🧵
The speaker, Michael Barnes, is starting now. He says that we have an affordable housing crisis, not a market-rate housing crisis.

Author's note: always fun to see suburban NIMBYs 🤝 San Francisco "progressives" using the same language
Barnes claims that RHNA was a failure historically, and he's absolutely right.

But it's because we didn't do the things (correctly calculate housing need, provide enforcement mechanisms, etc.) that he's now complaining about!
Read 35 tweets
Oct 12, 2022
Happy Tuesday, folks! I'm spending my evening at a town council meeting in the affluent Bay Area suburb of Atherton, home to many silicon valley billionaires.

Tonight, the town is discussing (read: freaking out about) their state-mandated housing plan. 🍿 recommended, 🧵 here:
This is something of a double-header, as I was covering Hillsborough (a few miles down the road) last night. That thread is here:

A few months back, Atherton garnered significant negative press after famed venture capitalist Marc Andreesen wrote a scathing letter about the plan, urging the town not to allow multifamily housing.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(