The reason for that is pretty straightforward: Chelsea is three square miles; Franklin County Regional Tech is 500 square miles. Both are Massachusetts school districts. As you might imagine, they spend WILDLY differing amounts on transportation.
What is different between Fall River--and, indeed, any municipal district in Massachusetts--and their neighboring regionals, is, that while BOTH have mandated state reimbursed transportation, only one of those reimbursements gets funded.
Regional district transportation--which gets 99% of the attention in the state--is in MGL Ch. 71, sec. 16C.
The kicker is right there in the opening: "The state treasurer shall annually, on or before November twentieth, pay to the several towns subject to appropriation,
"the sums required as reimbursement for expenses approved by the commissioner of education, incurred by any town for the transportation of pupils not more than twice daily between any school within the town, or in another town, and the pupil's home"
This of course does not occur
As noted by former @massauditor Suzanne Bump in her tour de force final report, that's how we end up with regular day school transportation outside of regional districts being among the most unfunded of mandates: mass.gov/info-details/r…
@massauditor The argument has been that regional transportation was 'a deal' for regionalization (as if regionalization was only in the state's interest, which I personally would dispute).
Generally, regionals that are geographically large note their size.
There are, though, municipal districts that are also geographically large, and of course there are municipal districts that are larger than some regionals.
However, it doesn't count towards net school spending for anybody, and it's reimbursed only for regional districts. #MAEdu
finally watching last week's Joint Ways & Means hearing, and appreciate @Jo_Comerford's question on the balance of one time versus sustained funding #MAEdu
she also did a lovely, polite refocus of her question; good chairing!
Cheers also to Sen @AnneGobi for opening her Q to @MassEducation a pointed: "on behalf of the entire Worcester delegation for your thoughtful and spot-on comments regarding the charter school in Worcester. It was extremely appreciated."
ok, good morning, I have a question (just getting to #MAEdu news from yesterday):
This MEEP claim that gaps have widened over the pandemic is based on...what exactly?
We don't yet have the last year's MCAS data. We don't yet have MA NAEP data.
The report cites 2019 to 2021 third grade reading scores, and then percentage of low income 9th graders passing their classes compared to wealthier peers.
Then enrollment in college, which we know dropped...everywhere?
It's mesmerizing to me that the coverage of this always appears to exist in a space apart from those "Boston: worst traffic in the country" and "Boston grapples with melting public transit" articles
A series of what will probably be unpopular statements about yesterday's #MAEdu Board vote on the MCAS, but gosh, I hate seeing bad info circulating:
1. This was supposed to happen years ago. The change in competency determination is tied to the new MCAS. What has been used for literally YEARS now was an interim step as we switched from one to the other. It was delayed by the pandemic.
2. The creation and maintenance of a "competency determination" based on the tenth grade evaluation is a power of the Board per MGL Ch. 69, sec. 1 (d).