fanatical Christians, right-wing Christians, are big on *demons*. @PastorMark serves here as a handy example but he's got a hundred thousand soulmates here. American extremist Christianity, in particular, is obsessed with devils and demons and other such evil beasties.

(cont'd)
indeed there's a vibrant lucrative *trade* in demon-related services, in the right-wing Christian grifting community. it's one of those slightly shameful, guilty side-cults and superstitions that help sustain American Christians. (@MattWalshBlog, ever been "exorcised"?)

(cont'd)
here's a video clip from a "Global Vision" thing (q.v. the "Global Vision Bible Church", @globalvisionbc), affiliated with @pastorlocke), talking about casting out evil spirits:

Christian fanatics are practically *forced* to traffic with demons.

(cont'd)
why do I say that?

it's because extremist Christianity, the sort that props up people like @MattWalshBlog and @shadihamid, has been condensed down to a rigid and ultimately *unsatisfying* formula for "salvation" (whatever that is), like it was a mere set of equations.

(cont'd)
no two right-wing Christians believes in exactly the same set of Christian formulae; the "faith" of @MattWalshBlog is not the same as that of @DavidAFrench, and French's "faith" is not the same as @shadihamid's, and so on. but they do share a kindred *oversimplicity*.

(cont'd)
the ultimate thing that Christian fanatics like @RepMTG get from their formulaic faith is self-assurance: they're on the winning side and God has guaranteed them final victory, and that's that. Satan is powerful but always loses, just like Emmanuel Goldstein in "1984".

(cont'd)
Goldstein, Orwell's scapegoat in "1984", was sadly well-chosen: he's an antisemitic stereotype, for fascists (both explicitly Christian ones like @MattWalshBlog and irreligious ones like @elonmusk and @mtaibbi) still cling to antisemitic stereotypes as pocket villains.

(cont'd)
that's not *just* a right-wing thing; @elonmusk and @mtaibbi have a handy "Emmanuel Goldstein" figure in George Soros, but @TheDemocrats and @HillaryClinton like to blame their woes on "Bernie"—antisemitic stereotypes and scapegoats lurk everywhere in American politics.

(cont'd)
the scapegoats are like visible representations of the extremist Christian need to believe in *demons*, in concrete agents of Evil™—because without these things, people like @PastorMark and @MattWalshBlog have no explanation for why things always go wrong for them.

(cont'd)
the rigid formulae of their faith say that they're on the winning side, that they're "saved", that their enemies will always lose—and yet @MattWalshBlog &c. are always getting humiliated. (Walsh tries to convince himself he's a winner still—that's doublethink for you!)

(cont'd)
what's the explanation? if God always wins and if @PastorMark / @MattWalshBlog / @realchrisrufo are *with God*, then...why do they _ever_ suffer defeats?

they're almost *forced* towards dualism—which is heretical from a strict Christian viewpoint but never mind that.

(cont'd)
it's *heresy* for a Christian (even @DouthatNYT) to put the forces of evil—Satan, devils, demons, whoever—on the same plane as God, able to conquer and rule over people, able to manipulate matter and energy, able even to *create* things. (I'm not Christian, by the way.)

(cont'd)
but @MattWalshBlog, @PastorMark, &c. practically are *compelled* to believe that Satan and demons are _that powerful_. otherwise they have no good explanation for why they're a mere extremist fringe, able to succeed only through trickery and ratfucking (and coercion.)

(cont'd)
it's much easier to believe in demons than it is to believe in God or Jesus—these entities have been smothered in unreality and fantasy, reduced to mere picture-postcards and Christian-music album covers and so forth. is Jesus *real* to @MattWalshBlog? one doubts it.

(cont'd)
but Hell and devils? one can see them everywhere. if Hell is anything it's pain and suffering, and the world is inundated with pain—indeed, @MattWalshBlog, @pastorlocke, &c. practically *wallow* in the stuff, and take much glee in causing the maximum pain to others.

(cont'd)
it's easy, far too easy, to look at an unfortunate human being in the grips of some harmful compulsion—drink, drugs, @MattWalshBlog's pedophiliac impulses—and see them simply as the victim of a "devil" to be driven out. as if you could cure alcoholism by *force*!

(cont'd)
but in a way, that's the hope that sustains Christian fanatics' beliefs about devils and demons. if alcoholism or compulsive deceit or any other harmful activity is merely a *demon*, then you can just...beat it up, right?

like Ernest Angley here, grabbing a kid's head.

(cont'd) Image
who is Ernest Angley? they were a "charismatic" Christian preacher-grifter, much like @lancewallnau
or @Paula_White (right-wing fanatics both associated with @mtaibbi's pal @realDonaldTrump).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_An…

Angley's one of a *huge* crowd of "faith healers".

(cont'd)
"faith healing" is far from a Christian-only activity but right-wing #Christianity is *especially* taken with the idea that the only cure you need for any ailments, physical or emotional, is to have some holy person invoke Jesus to flog that evil stuff right out of you.

(cont'd)
sometimes the violence is *literal*—#Christian faith healers really love to grab their victims, hit them over the head, and do other worse things to them in the name of Jesus and "the Holy Spirit". even sexual assault and rape aren't off the table (q.v. @MattWalshBlog.)

(cont'd)
@PastorMark, whose blithering about demons prompted this thread, is known to have been a sex pest—one can be fairly certain that God and Jesus and "the Holy Ghost" were always in the room whenever he was forcing himself on a victim. it was *holy* sexual assault!

(cont'd)
anything to drive the demons out. that's the great thing about believing in demons, i.e. in creatures you've simply *defined* as always being evil and safe to destroy—you can feel justified in doing any crimes to stop demons. rape is acceptable. *murder* is acceptable.

(cont'd)
you can bet that @ThisIsKyleR's Christianized mind assisted in his murderous intentions—he probably thought he was (in some fashion) killing a couple demons when he ventured forth to find people to murder. he could tell himself he was committing *sacred violence*.

(cont'd)
"Demons don't sleep", says @PastorMark—well, neither do angels, and Mark Driscoll undoubtedly thinks of himself as angelic. same with @MattWalshBlog; same with murderer @ThisIsKyleR.

unicorns, however, do need their rest. so I think I'll take some.

~Mona Drafter of Pnictogen

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pnictogen Horses

Pnictogen Horses Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PnictogenHorses

Mar 26
#imagination!

imagination is life. imagination is central to thought.

it's also vital to the _tokusatsu_ show "Ressha Sentai ToQger", vide infra. "ToQger" is a favorite of ours—the heroes' greatest strength is their imagination, which their enemies hope to snuff out.

(cont'd) Image
in Western society, only a few persons are allowed to have #imagination. it's true. imagination, in most persons in "the West", is punished.

consider the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi cult: the reason that Elon Musk is so adored is that he's allowed to have a free imagination.

(cont'd)
there's nothing very much *original* about @elonmusk's imagination, which has an antique quality about it. it's not merely a question of advancing years, although Musk (despite his babyish personality) is getting old. Akira Kurosawa was imaginative till the day he died.

(cont'd)
Read 25 tweets
Mar 25
I have never watched Richard Nixon's actual infamous 1962 televised breakdown, after he lost the California gubernatorial election to incumbent Pat Brown.

this is the speech in which Mr. Nixon said "you won't have me to kick around anymore"—it's well-known. I haven't seen it! ImageImage
Chara hasn't seen it, I don't think. Frisk almost certainly has, but a long time ago.

it seems to be difficult to find a straightforward clip of Mr. @dick_nixon's concession speech in 1962! here is a partial clip:

here's an edited video that uses a bit more of the *audio* from the concession speech:



fragments. this is frustrating! this is one of the most famous moments in American history! do I need to go to the @dick_nixon library to see the whole thing?

~Mona
Read 13 tweets
Mar 25
we aren't used to strict Christian upbringing; it's tough for us to watch. we have to remind ourselves that things aren't what they first seem.

Mrs. Nixon is a strict Quaker; she addresses young @dick_nixon with "thee"—this may sound merely *upsetting* to modern ears.

(cont'd) Image
"thee" and "thou" and "thy", however, are pronouns used to refer to human beings in a general way, i.e. not an excessively *familiar* and specific way. Spanish, for example, has a similar distinction between the general-purpose _usted_ and the familiar _tú_.

(cont'd)
in addressing her son with "thee", Mrs. Nixon is reminding her son that she speaks to him as one Christian to another—as one person to another. it's slightly distancing, yes, but it's not meant to be hurtful or punitive, even if it seems that way.

(cont'd)
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25
Murray Chotiner (played by famous Yiddish theatre actor Fyvush Finkel) gives us a summary of the dedicated politician, the person who believes for whatever reason that they ought to be in charge of things.

"Because if he's not this Nixon [i.e. President] he's nobody".

(cont'd) ImageImage
this mindset is *foreign* to us. who thinks this about themselves?

lots of people, as it turns out. large numbers of Americans are raised to believe that they somehow *deserve* to have life-and-death power over millions of human beings—they think it's their *calling*.

(cont'd)
@elonmusk keeps staggering forward towards his antic visions of The Future™ because he believes in himself—wherever he gets his sense of destiny, he's got it, and he believes in it, and he thinks the Cosmos *needs* him. and thus, Elon Musk has admirers and believers.

(cont'd)
Read 7 tweets
Mar 25
Nixon: "Howard Hunt is working for the White House? Jesus Christ."

the very word *conspiracy* carries a lot of false connotations with it—notions perpetuated by peddlers of *false* conspiracies, like you'll find in the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @ShellenbergerMD crowd.

(cont'd) Image
people of @mtaibbi's stripe want "conspiracy" to conjure up mental fantasies of sinister organizations of evildoers—as if @TheDemocrats or "the Cabal" (the antisemitic QAnon trope) were like S.P.E.C.T.R.E. from Bond movies or S.E.E.L.E. from "Neon Genesis Evangelion".

(cont'd) Image
*real* conspiracies are messy and slipshod. they're still _conspiracies_—that is to say, they're still groups of people all working together (directly or indirectly) towards a common nefarious goal. but they're not all necessarily masterminds, or being masterminded.

(cont'd)
Read 11 tweets
Mar 25
Ollie Stone's "Nixon" begins with Howard Hunt's CREeP boys prepping for the Watergate breakin and for some reason they're watching a short film on sales technique—for all I know, this is historical, but for now we take this as a reminder of a common *theme* about Nixon.

(cont'd) Image
the theme was most famously explored in Joe McGinnis's book "The Selling of the President, 1968"—Nixon, the book asserts, was a triumph of slick *marketing*. young Richard Nixon was not an appealing man, but he was able to rebrand himself as an older, wiser statesman.

(cont'd) Image
there's a direct line to be drawn between Mr. @dick_nixon's 1968 marketing machine, and the current-day attempts of the @GOP—an extremist Christian fascist party—to rebrand itself, with the help of frauds like @elonmusk and @mtaibbi, as somehow the rebellious outsiders.

(cont'd)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(