the Duggar Family (@duggarfam) are an infamous family of Christian extremists who were superstars (with their own TV show!) of right-wing Christianity for a time. they're still stars; they still keep up their grifting activities, posing as ideals of Christian parenting.

(cont'd) partial screenshot of the Google page that results from sear
right-wing #Christian grifters, in general, have worked for *decades* at the pretense that they're ideal parents. @MattBruenig's terrifying wife, @ebruenig, is one such grifter; @MattWalshBlog exploits his family for his fascist propaganda; they are two among myriads.

(cont'd)
there's a lot of money in it, for one thing. right-wing Christianity and entrepreneurial money-grubbing are inseparable activities: just about *every* prominent American #Christian is someone dedicated to _worldly success_. they're politicians, pundits, business moguls.

(cont'd)
Christian church leaders are indistinguishable from mere media celebrities, hungry for money and fame. people like @pastorlocke and @RickWarren and @Franklin_Graham are "pastors" in some sense, but really they're TV and Internet stars—like the @duggarfam in that regard.

(cont'd)
the Duggars had a good thing going, selling themselves as ideal Christian parents. then @joshduggar happened. then THIS happened:

archive.is/HpyZ3


Josh Duggar, one of the stars of this "Christian family", turned out to be a child rapist.

(cont'd)
right-wing #Christianity responded to news of @joshduggar in a variety of ways, but all of these people were united behind one central principle: somehow, this was someone else's fault. Josh Duggar wasn't to blame; he was the _injured party_.

archive.is/cgdrb

(cont'd)
the Pnictogen Wing has been particularly keen to remind @MattWalshBlog (of @theblaze and @realDailyWire) of his loathsome defence of @joshduggar's child rape, in which "progressives" were apparently the true villain; but Walsh was not alone in taking Josh Duggar's side.

(cont'd)
one can see rather clearly why @MattWalshBlog and @erichovind and @GovMikeHuckabee, and many thousands of other right-wing Christian fanatics, came instinctively to the defence of child-raping @joshduggar: he was *idol* of theirs; they needed to keep him propped up.

(cont'd)
this is habitual of right-wing Christians like @MattWalshBlog—they are extremely and monomaniacally dedicated to preserving the integrity and good name of their faction (@mtaibbi would call it a "tribe" because he's a racist dunce). it's their prime moral directive.

(cont'd)
they saw @joshduggar's child rape not as a horrible crime that a "good Christian" should never have committed; they saw it as an *embarrassment*—one caused by "progressives" and "the media" and other diabolical forces trying to create a humiliation for God and Jesus.

(cont'd)
in typical doublethinkful Christian fashion, @MattWalshBlog &c. weren't quite sure whether @joshduggar's child molestation was even real or not. preacher Carrie Hurd (a "Quiverfull" cultist—put a pin in that) opined that maybe it was just *games*. maybe it was nothing.

(cont'd)
at best, @MattWalshBlog &c. could acknowledge @joshduggar's raping his own siblings as a vague abstraction. it was "sinfulness". and we're all sinners, right? this is typical of right-wing Christians: they treat all their own crimes as diffuse "sin", already forgiven.

(cont'd)
the *real* sin, to them, was that "progressives" and other devilish enemies were hurting #Christianity, using @joshduggar and his crimes as a weapon.

in general, this is how Christians in public life have dealt with habitual Christian child abuse and child rape.

(cont'd)
how have #Catholic fascists like @RealTXPolitics, @MattWalshBlog, and @DouthatNYT reacted to *ongoing* Catholic priests' child abuse and child molestation? as with @joshduggar's child rape they view such news chiefly as though it were some made-up thing, a leftist ploy.

(cont'd)
either it's all made up; or "everybody does it" and therefore it shouldn't be a big deal when priests rape children; or they blame the victims, or they blame society itself—as if drag queens or trans people were somehow the reason that Catholic priests rape children.

(cont'd)
it's never the Christian rapists' fault; it's always someone else's. "homosexualism" is why Catholic priests rape children; "men in dresses" are @MattWalshBlog is thirsty to impregnate underaged girls.

these people talk of "personal responsibility" a lot...

(cont'd)
...yet *personal responsibility* is never something that @MattWalshBlog &c. ever feel the need to exercise. @joshduggar certainly didn't; he merely slaked his own perverted lusts at the expense of his own siblings, then begged for a plenary indulgence of his crimes.

(cont'd)
I mentioned "Quiverfull" Carrie Hurd, earlier. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiverfull

the "Quiverfull" movement is a reification of the Christian fascist social imperative: women, to Christian fascists, are supposed to be baby factories. @elonmusk believes roughly the same thing.

(cont'd)
(not that @elonmusk believes in anything certain, but he *does* believe that women need to make more babies.)

the very name "Quiverfull" suggests the dehumanized motivation behind this baby-making imperative: they view children as *weapons*, like arrows in a quiver.

(cont'd)
children aren't *persons* to @MattWalshBlog, @GovMikeHuckabee, &c.—they're *objects*, they're *property*, and they exist to satisfy adults' needs (and even adults' lusts.) fanatical Christian parents think of their children as inanimate *stuff* to be moulded into shape.

(cont'd)
it's all part of the war that right-wing Christians are constantly fighting: @MattWalshBlog &c. consider themselves to be soldiers for Jesus, and their children ought to be grateful for the chance to be tools in the hands of doughty Christian paladins like Matt Walsh.

(cont'd)
think about how the *children* must feel about being mere tools of their #Christian parents, and you'll perhaps understand just why @joshduggar could be such a catastrophically perverted screw-up—raping his own siblings was probably about as *powerful* as he ever felt.

(cont'd)
and @MattWalshBlog &c. want ALL children raised the way @joshduggar was.

think about that one for a minute, if you will.

~Mona Drafter of Pnictogen

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pnictogen Horses

Pnictogen Horses Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PnictogenHorses

Mar 26
#imagination!

imagination is life. imagination is central to thought.

it's also vital to the _tokusatsu_ show "Ressha Sentai ToQger", vide infra. "ToQger" is a favorite of ours—the heroes' greatest strength is their imagination, which their enemies hope to snuff out.

(cont'd) Image
in Western society, only a few persons are allowed to have #imagination. it's true. imagination, in most persons in "the West", is punished.

consider the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi cult: the reason that Elon Musk is so adored is that he's allowed to have a free imagination.

(cont'd)
there's nothing very much *original* about @elonmusk's imagination, which has an antique quality about it. it's not merely a question of advancing years, although Musk (despite his babyish personality) is getting old. Akira Kurosawa was imaginative till the day he died.

(cont'd)
Read 25 tweets
Mar 25
I have never watched Richard Nixon's actual infamous 1962 televised breakdown, after he lost the California gubernatorial election to incumbent Pat Brown.

this is the speech in which Mr. Nixon said "you won't have me to kick around anymore"—it's well-known. I haven't seen it! ImageImage
Chara hasn't seen it, I don't think. Frisk almost certainly has, but a long time ago.

it seems to be difficult to find a straightforward clip of Mr. @dick_nixon's concession speech in 1962! here is a partial clip:

here's an edited video that uses a bit more of the *audio* from the concession speech:



fragments. this is frustrating! this is one of the most famous moments in American history! do I need to go to the @dick_nixon library to see the whole thing?

~Mona
Read 13 tweets
Mar 25
we aren't used to strict Christian upbringing; it's tough for us to watch. we have to remind ourselves that things aren't what they first seem.

Mrs. Nixon is a strict Quaker; she addresses young @dick_nixon with "thee"—this may sound merely *upsetting* to modern ears.

(cont'd) Image
"thee" and "thou" and "thy", however, are pronouns used to refer to human beings in a general way, i.e. not an excessively *familiar* and specific way. Spanish, for example, has a similar distinction between the general-purpose _usted_ and the familiar _tú_.

(cont'd)
in addressing her son with "thee", Mrs. Nixon is reminding her son that she speaks to him as one Christian to another—as one person to another. it's slightly distancing, yes, but it's not meant to be hurtful or punitive, even if it seems that way.

(cont'd)
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25
Murray Chotiner (played by famous Yiddish theatre actor Fyvush Finkel) gives us a summary of the dedicated politician, the person who believes for whatever reason that they ought to be in charge of things.

"Because if he's not this Nixon [i.e. President] he's nobody".

(cont'd) ImageImage
this mindset is *foreign* to us. who thinks this about themselves?

lots of people, as it turns out. large numbers of Americans are raised to believe that they somehow *deserve* to have life-and-death power over millions of human beings—they think it's their *calling*.

(cont'd)
@elonmusk keeps staggering forward towards his antic visions of The Future™ because he believes in himself—wherever he gets his sense of destiny, he's got it, and he believes in it, and he thinks the Cosmos *needs* him. and thus, Elon Musk has admirers and believers.

(cont'd)
Read 7 tweets
Mar 25
Nixon: "Howard Hunt is working for the White House? Jesus Christ."

the very word *conspiracy* carries a lot of false connotations with it—notions perpetuated by peddlers of *false* conspiracies, like you'll find in the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @ShellenbergerMD crowd.

(cont'd) Image
people of @mtaibbi's stripe want "conspiracy" to conjure up mental fantasies of sinister organizations of evildoers—as if @TheDemocrats or "the Cabal" (the antisemitic QAnon trope) were like S.P.E.C.T.R.E. from Bond movies or S.E.E.L.E. from "Neon Genesis Evangelion".

(cont'd) Image
*real* conspiracies are messy and slipshod. they're still _conspiracies_—that is to say, they're still groups of people all working together (directly or indirectly) towards a common nefarious goal. but they're not all necessarily masterminds, or being masterminded.

(cont'd)
Read 11 tweets
Mar 25
Ollie Stone's "Nixon" begins with Howard Hunt's CREeP boys prepping for the Watergate breakin and for some reason they're watching a short film on sales technique—for all I know, this is historical, but for now we take this as a reminder of a common *theme* about Nixon.

(cont'd) Image
the theme was most famously explored in Joe McGinnis's book "The Selling of the President, 1968"—Nixon, the book asserts, was a triumph of slick *marketing*. young Richard Nixon was not an appealing man, but he was able to rebrand himself as an older, wiser statesman.

(cont'd) Image
there's a direct line to be drawn between Mr. @dick_nixon's 1968 marketing machine, and the current-day attempts of the @GOP—an extremist Christian fascist party—to rebrand itself, with the help of frauds like @elonmusk and @mtaibbi, as somehow the rebellious outsiders.

(cont'd)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(