Why the Uttar Pradesh govt might have ignored Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 by capturing the Sarus Crane, translocating & now put it in captivity in Kanpur Zoo. A thread. (1/n) #SarusCrane#BirdsOfTwitter@UPGovt@UpforestUp
The WPA allows capturing/ hunting a Sch I animal under s11 only when CWLW is satisfied that the animal is dangerous to human life or disabled or diseased beyond recovery.. that too in written order citing reasons. (2/n)
S12 allows grant of permission to capture wild animals for special purposes which includes education, sci. research, etc. Translocation to alternative habitat is allowed... All this requires written statement of reasons from CWLW.. (3/n)
Sarus Crane is not a forest dwelling bird. It is infact more common in agricultural wetland mosaic which includes cultivated land, paddy fields etc. More info available here- (4/n) wii.gov.in/nmcg/priority-…
Translocating the Sarus from its natural habitat (in Amethi), to a different landscape (Rae Bareli) required clear establishment of threat from the animal or to the animal. In this case it is not clearly established (atleast from the news I read/ saw till date). (5/n)
Further, the animal is now reportedly kept in Kanpur zoo, which is clearly not a conservation approach. Sarus are social birds & have deep cultural association with locals in India. (6/n)
Photo & source- aninews.in/news/national/…
Human-Wildlife co-existence is foundation of Indian culture. In this beautiful video see how Hon'ble Prime Minister @narendramodi is interacting with our national bird Pea fowl, which has same protection as Sarus. Such element of caring is needed. (7/n)
If the State was too concerned, the Forest Department could've made arrangements for safety of the Sarus in its natural habitat. Translocating it from its natural habitat, & landing it in cage (Zoo) is simply unacceptable, perhaps not what WPA intends to. (8/n)
I humbly request @myogiadityanath to kindly intervene & release back the Sarus to its original habitat & make arrangements for its safety, & coordinate with the village council for better management of the habitat & to ensure long term conservation of its State bird. 🙏🙏 (9/n)
The photo in the first tweet is from Dhanauri village in Noida, Delhi NCR. This agricultural village is the extreme west habitat of Sarus & threatened from urbanisation. Support of locals are crucial for conservation & protection of the species which naturally prefers such… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill 2023 is introduced in the Lok Sabha today. Statement of Objects- the govt is trying to prevent misinterpretation of the provisions of FCA wrt recorded forest in T.N. Godavarman judgment. #Thread on my opinion from 1st reading of the Bill (1/n)
The Bill systematically dilutes the provisions of 'Deemed Forest' in Supreme Court judgment in T.N. Godavarman, where any land which is recorded as forest in govt record required 'Forest Clearance'. Now the amendment proposes to include only those lands which are recorded as… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This is major exemption & threaten a significant area of forest land in the country, especially because majority of such recorded forest lands were originally transferred to forest dept during abolishment of Zamindari system (in 50s-70s). (3/n)
Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Bill 2022 just tabled in Rajya Sabha. The revised Bill was passed by Lok Sabha in last session-will be ineteresting to see how it gets debated in the RS. #Thread#ParliamentWinterSession
You can watch the debate here.-
Mr Vivek Tankha (INC) talking about Ecosensitive Zones ignored by the WPA Bill. Good to see the point being discussed in the parliament.
Dr Kanimozhi Somu (DMK) talking about the livelihood & cultural rights of indigenous people. Interesting to see her talking about role of different biogeographic zones & unique biodiversiry, sustainable tourism. Sadly she didnt comment anything on the Bill.
The latest Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Bill 2022 had inserted a new proviso in s43(2) which allows the Central Govt. to prescribe Rules for transfer/ transport of ‘captive elephants’ for ‘religious or other purposes’. This thread discusses legal problems in doing that. (1/n)
Capturing any Schedule I animal (wild or captive) is prohibited activity under WPA’72, except under some extraordinary circumstances as outlined in s11 & s12. FYI- capturing any wild animal is considered as ‘hunting’ as per the WPA definition. (2/n)
S11 permits hunting when animal becomes dangerous to human life/ property or diseased/disabled beyond recovery. S12 permits capturing Sch I animals for special purposes which is mentioned in the WPA (See attached screenshot). Thus any exception can be granted only under S12 (3/n)
The Env Minister @byadavbjp tabled the Biological Diversity Amendment Bill in LS, reportedly w/o public consultation. Sources said there was only an internal consultation. Attchd objective and reasons. My initial opinion on the bill in the next tweets (1/n)
The bill dilutes the restriction imposed under s3c(ii) on corporation registered in India which has any non-Indian participation as shareholder or management. Now the amendment (img2)creates a new category 'foreign controlled company' with a ref to Company Act. (2a/n)
As per Companies Act 2013- foreign companies means company incorporated outside India & contradicts the present provisions which restricts specifically companies registered in India but has participation of non-Indian. "..control of a foreigner" not defined. (2b/n)