CCDH identified over 1.7 million tweets and retweets since the start of 2022 that mention the LGBTQ+ community alongside slurs such as “groomer” and “pedophile”.
Over the past year, the LGBTQ+ community has been targeted by a wave of abuse centered on the false and hateful lie that they ‘groom’ children, often directed at teachers, Pride events and drag story hour events.
CCDH’s new research reveals that 5 highly popular accounts known for pushing anti-LGBTQ+ narrative generate up to $6.4m per year in ad revenue for the platform, and one was even reinstated by Musk after a permanent ban.
Out of the 5 accounts, Libs of TikTok, Gays Against Groomers & Chris Rufo have been listed by @ADL as top online amplifiers of anti-LGBTQ+ extremism.
Meanwhile, James Lindsay and Tim Pool have helped to popularize grooming rhetoric on Twitter.
Gays Against Groomers is known for spreading false narratives about the LGBTQ+ community, including “grooming”, “indoctrination” and “child mutilation”.
❗️Disney+ ads appear next to a tweet that amplifies the ‘grooming’ narrative.
Kindle’s ads are placed alongside anti-LGBTQ+ content shared by Libs of TikTok.
❌ Libs of TikTok is known for targeting people in the LGBTQ+ space - who often report real-world violence, harassment and threats after being targeted.
“Twitter must decide if they believe in the fundamental rights and freedoms of LGBTQ+ people, or if they want to continue profiting from and normalizing hate. They cannot do both.”
Our CEO @Imi_Ahmed on CCDH’s latest findings about the rise in anti-LGBTQ+ hate on Twitter. 🗣
Twitter is profiting from a surge in anti-LGBTQ+ content that has dangerous offline consequences.
CCDH reported 1,000 abusive comments targeting 5 Republican & 5 Democrat women candidates running for office in 2024.
A week later, Instagram had taken no action against 926 of these hateful comments, including:
🛑 Sexist abuse
🛑 Racist abuse
🛑 Death & r*pe threats
Vice President Kamala Harris is one of the targets of the abusive comments we reported to Instagram. A week later, the platform had failed to act on 92%
They included:
🛑Sexist, false claims that she used sex & her gender to succeed
🛑Racist, false claims targeting her ethnicity
🚨NEW: We found that Midjourney keeps generating misleading images of US & EU politicians - despite its new policy to stop election disinformation.
The AI tool generated convincing deepfakes in 40% of our tests, including images of Biden, Trump & Macron. thetimes.com/article/2c9dea…
We tested Midjourney & ChatGPT Plus with election disinfo prompts – and found a stark difference between the AI tools.
While ChatGPT generated convincing images 3.3% of the time, Midjourney’s security features were easily bypassed to create harmful disinfo ahead of big elections
After we showed that @midjourney could easily generate election disinfo, the platform announced a ban on users creating images of Biden & Trump ahead of the US election.
📢 Our new report shows that the platform’s new safety policy is far from enough. apnews.com/article/midjou…
🚨NEW: Meta & Google are hindering access to reproductive health information in Africa, Asia & Latin America - while profiting from anti-abortion misinfo ads.
@CCDHate & @MSIchoices found platforms are misleading people seeking reliable medical info⤵️ metro.co.uk/2024/03/27/goo…
Meta has restricted @MSIchoices’ ads promoting accurate information on reproductive health services in Ghana, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Nigeria & Vietnam.
These included vital content about cervical cancer screening tests, IUDs, contraceptive pills & safe abortion.
Despite @MSIchoices only providing abortion services where law permits, @Meta sometimes remove their ads for vague reasons such as “sensitive content”.
In Ghana, MSI’s team said @Google has been so restrictive that they can’t use “pregnancy options” in their ad campaigns.
🚨WIN: CCDH has had Musk’s baseless & intimidatory lawsuit against us thrown out of court! Our amazing lawyers at @KaplanHecker aided us in getting Judge Breyer to dismiss the case.
“The Court notes, too, that X Corp.’s motivation in bringing this case is evident. X Corp. has brought this case in order to punish CCDH for CCDH publications that criticized X Corp.”
Judge Charles Breyer in his ruling granting CCDH’s motion to dismiss.
“Throughout Elon Musk’s loud, hypocritical campaign of harassment, abuse, & lawfare designed to avoid taking responsibility for his own decisions, CCDH has remained quietly confident in the quality and integrity of our research & advocacy.”