Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
@DeepBlueCrypto
Mar 28, 2023 • 18 tweets • 11 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
A bipartisan bill called the #RestrictAct has been proposed by Mark Warner of Virginia & John Thune of South Dakota, to protect national security and ending foreign adversaries. Apps like TikTok to be banned from misusing American consumer data or … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Here’s the #RestrictAct

warner.senate.gov/public/_cache/…
Are you a VPN user in USA… too bad #RestrictAct could get you decades in jail for using VPN 🤷‍♂️ Image
The #RestrictAct gives sweeping powers to the secretary of commerce and the president (the executive branch) to take appropriate measures against people/products/services they deem threaten national security. Image
The powers that #RestrictAct gives over citizens and foreign nationals are unprecedented.

Civil violations can result in penalties up to $250,000 or twice the amount of transaction committed, whichever is greater.

Criminal penalties can get you fines up to $1,000,000 and up to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
The adversary elements in this bill are so vast, you might as well kiss your innovation goodbye in the USA. This might apply AI, ML, Quantum computing and even cryptography.

Blockchain & Crypto projects would be under the purview of this bill 😱 ImageImageImage
The #RestrictAct aids the American #Government in restricting citizens rights & liberties, turn itself into a totalitarian surveillance state just like China, which it’s trying to stop. Image
The #RestrictAct will morph America into China a totalitarian state. Image
The #RestrictAct is the #PatriotAct on steroids and you all know what powers and rights you lost with patriot act 🤷‍♂️

The #RestrictAct is not just limited to TikTok it’s much more than that
If #RestrictAct gets passed you might as well leave America, it’s that bad Image
#RestrictAct isn’t about banning TikTok, it’s controlling the entirety of your internet & digital presence

And who are the foreign adversaries. BTW this list isn’t complete, your executive branch can deem any individual or country or an entity an adversary at anytime 🤷‍♂️ ImageImage
You’ll be a complete clown puppet in the hands of your master & controller the #BigBrother after the #RestrictAct gets passed into law 🤷‍♂️ Image
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

The RESTRICT ACT S 686 is a massive violation of our 4th Amendment Rights and a complete Nationalization of the internet.

@SenateGOP if you attempt to pass this Bill, you will be sealing the nail in the coffin of Freedom and … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Google Trends for #RESTRICTAct is at the highest levels. What does this mean -- lots of people of scared to see their freedoms erode away with this act. Image
The #RESTRICTAct isn’t about TikTok
The #RESTRICTAct is about your freedom & privacy on the internet

The #RESTRICTAct is #PatriotAct on steroids. Image
#RESTRICTAct isn’t about TikTok Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DeepBlueCrypto

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Sep 20
Ian Carroll's breakdown of the three tiers of conspiracy was absolutely brilliant.

“What is the Big Conspiracy?”

He lays it down easily with money, power and people and diving into those rabbit holes, with Dark agencies doing their dirty work.

A 🧵 on conspiracy theories 👇
Here’s a prev thread on the same
Some of the most common conspiracy theories that have been proven correct recently
Read 11 tweets
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Sep 9
Joe Rogan: "Before COVID I would have told you that vaccines are the most important invention in human history.

After Covid, I'm like, I don't think we went to the Moon and I think Pizzagate is real."

A thread on #ConspiracyTheories 👇

Here’s a prev thread on the same
Follow @shipwreckshow if you don’t already… she’s amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Read 25 tweets
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Sep 1
ELON MUSK IS A CHAMPION OF FREE SPEECH THROUGH X AND THEY HATE ELON MUSK FOR IT BECAUSE THEY CANNOT CONTROL THE NARRATIVES

Elon Musk's acquisition and rebranding of Twitter to X has not only transformed the platform's identity but also its role in global discourse, particularly in how it challenges establishment narratives. Through X, Musk has positioned himself as a champion of free speech, often clashing with regulatory bodies, governments, and judicial systems over what he perceives as overreaches in controlling information. This stance has led to numerous conflicts, most notably with Brazilian Judge Alexandre de Moraes, highlighting Musk's commitment to allowing a broad spectrum of voices on the platform. This approach has made X a battleground for free speech, where Musk's decisions to reinstate previously banned accounts or resist content moderation requests are seen by some as defending the right to express diverse opinions, thereby exposing truths that might otherwise be suppressed by more conventional media or governmental controls.

The establishment's discomfort with X under Musk's leadership stems largely from this very commitment to unfettered speech. Musk's public feuds, like his labeling of Judge Moraes as dictatorial for attempting to regulate content on X, illustrate his broader critique of how power structures might use legal or regulatory frameworks to stifle dissent or alternative viewpoints. This dynamic has turned X into a platform where the establishment's narratives are frequently challenged, not just through policy but through the very content that users, encouraged by Musk's policies, are willing to post. This environment brings to light truths or perspectives that might be sidelined in more controlled media environments, thereby making X a unique arena for uncovering what might be considered hidden or inconvenient truths by those in power.
Here’s a prev thread on the same
Image
Read 64 tweets
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Aug 26
Democrats saw this chart and they said they wanted this badly… NOW

The "Great Replacement Theory" in America — there's a deliberate effort by liberal elites and political groups to demographically alter the country, replacing the white population with non-white immigrants. This shift is orchestrated to change the political landscape, ensuring a voter base more aligned with leftist policies.

A thread on election fraud👇Image
Here’s a previous thread on the same
Elon Musk was right 💯 as always…

🚩Democrats won’t support open borders if they don’t want to cheat in elections

🚩Democrats won’t block the Voter ID laws if they don’t plan on cheating in elections Image
Read 28 tweets
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Aug 26
The Clinton family, particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton, have been at the center of numerous corruption allegations throughout their political careers, with the Clinton Foundation often at the heart of these controversies. The foundation, established by Bill Clinton in 1997, has been criticized for its financial dealings, especially during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. Critics argue that the foundation's acceptance of donations from foreign governments and entities might have influenced U.S. policy decisions, suggesting a quid pro quo where donors gained access or favorable treatment in exchange for their contributions. This perception was fueled by investigations and reports, like those mentioned in the Durham report, which highlighted the FBI's interest in the foundation's activities, although these probes did not result in charges against the Clintons.

Moreover, the Clintons' involvement in various scandals, from Whitewater to Travelgate, has painted a picture of a family entangled in corruption. The Whitewater scandal involved allegations of fraudulent land deals, while Travelgate saw the controversial firing of the White House Travel Office staff, actions that critics argue were motivated by personal gain or retribution. These incidents, combined with the foundation's activities, have led to a narrative of systemic corruption within the Clinton family's operations, where personal enrichment and political influence are seen as intertwined. Despite investigations, the definitive proof of criminal wrongdoing directly linking the Clintons to these allegations has been elusive, yet the shadow of these controversies continues to influence public and political discourse around their legacy.

A thread on Clinton corruption 👇
Here’s a prev thread on the same
Because Clintons, Obamas, Bushes, McCains are all covered by the deep state DC machine Image
Read 34 tweets
🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture
Aug 25
THIS WILL BE YOUR FUTURE SOON…

In the year 2035, the digital landscape had evolved into a meticulously controlled environment, where the boundaries of free speech were redefined by the newly established Meme Regulation Authority (MRA). This Orwellian entity was tasked with monitoring, censoring, and prosecuting any digital content deemed subversive or offensive under the guise of protecting societal harmony. A Canadian woman named Elise, an unassuming graphic designer with a penchant for satirical humor, found herself at the center of this storm. One evening, after posting a meme that cleverly critiqued the government's latest surveillance policy, her life took an unexpected turn. The meme, which depicted a dystopian version of Canada where citizens were monitored by drones, went viral overnight. However, its spread was cut short when the MRA flagged it for "undermining state stability." Before dawn, Elise was awakened not by her alarm but by the sound of her door being forcefully opened by agents of the MRA, who arrested her under the newly enacted Digital Expression Act.

Elise's trial became a spectacle, not just for its novelty but for the chilling effect it had on digital expression across the nation. The courtroom was a blend of old-world justice and new-world surveillance, with screens displaying real-time analysis of public sentiment towards the trial. Prosecutors argued that Elise's meme could incite rebellion, citing its potential to influence thoughtcrime—a term borrowed from Orwell's "1984" but now legally recognized. Her defense, limited by the very laws she was accused of violating, struggled to argue the value of satire in a free society. The judge, after a deliberation that seemed more like a formality, sentenced Elise to three years in a reeducation facility, where she would be "reintegrated" into society with a corrected understanding of humor and loyalty to the state. The case set a precedent, chilling the once vibrant meme culture of Canada, where every share, like, or comment was now weighed against the specter of the MRA's watchful eye.Image
Here’s a prev meme thread on the same
In the year 2034, the world had become a tapestry of surveillance and control, where the lines between freedom and oppression blurred into a dystopian reality. Four friends, each residing in a different corner of the Anglosphere—Britain, Canada, France, and Australia—had unknowingly become the epicenter of a new form of governmental scrutiny.

The meme in question was simple yet potent: a cartoon depicting government officials as puppets, strings pulled by unseen hands, with the caption "Who's really in charge?" It went viral overnight, spreading like wildfire across social platforms, resonating with a public increasingly disillusioned with their leaders.

🚩Britain: In a quaint London flat, Tom was enjoying his morning tea when a knock echoed through his home. Opening the door, he found two officers in plain clothes, their badges gleaming under the overcast sky. "Mr. Tomlinson, we're from the Meme Regulation Unit. We need to discuss your online activity regarding a certain meme."

🚩Canada: Across the Atlantic, in Toronto, Sarah was woken by a similar intrusion. "Ms. Harper, we've traced IP addresses linked to the meme's origin. You're under investigation for spreading anti-government sentiment."

🚩France: In Paris, under the shadow of the Eiffel Tower, Jean was not surprised but rather resigned when the knock came. "Monsieur Dupont, we require immediate access to your digital devices. The meme you shared has been deemed a threat to national unity."

🚩Australia: In Sydney, the sun was setting when Mark's doorbell rang. "G'day, Mr. Thompson. We're here about a meme that's been causing quite a stir. We need proof you didn't create it, or evidence of who did."

Each friend, in their respective countries, faced the same ordeal. The Meme Police, a new branch of law enforcement, had been established to combat what was now legally defined as "digital subversion." They demanded logs, timestamps, and even biometric data to trace the meme's creator, arguing that such content could incite rebellion or chaos.

The friends, connected through their shared experience, realized the absurdity of their situation. They communicated covertly, using encrypted messages, discussing how their simple act of sharing a meme had turned their lives into a scene from Orwell's "1984." They pondered the irony of living in democracies where humor, once a weapon of the people, now required a license.

Their story, though fictional, served as a chilling reminder of a potential future where the line between satire and sedition could be dictated by those in power. The meme, a symbol of resistance, had inadvertently united them in a battle for digital freedom, highlighting the fragile balance between security and liberty in the digital age.

This tale, spread through whispers and encrypted channels, became a cautionary narrative of an Orwellian twist in the 21st century, where even a meme could make you an enemy of the state.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(