Post

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

https://twitter.com/lpmisescaucus/status/1639934790026555394

@SenateGOP

More from @DeepBlueCrypto

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Apr 12

The Federal Reserve was born in sin — all those that had power to oppose the creation of the FED died on Titanic.

In 1910 The Rockefellers, Rothschild, JP Morgan and other Private Bankers gathered on Jekyll Island to create “The Federal Reserve”

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893766849684193488

Here’s a prev thread on the FED

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893766849684193488

Read 8 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Apr 7

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #33 for your awareness👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1907444086660903023

Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1907444086660903023

Probably nothing — Quantum Computing

Read 17 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Apr 2

In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.

What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.

A thread on politics and politicians👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1902319347407712416

Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1902319347407712416

Looking at the massive fraud, corruption and abuse revealed by @DOGE it seems obvious now

Read 29 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Mar 12

“EPSTEIN CLIENTS ARE ABOVE THE LAW”

The statement that "more squirrels and raccoons have been arrested than Epstein clients" highlights a stark disparity between the enforcement of minor, even absurd, regulations and the apparent reluctance to pursue justice against powerful individuals implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. In late 2024, the case of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon captured public attention when New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation raided Mark Longo’s home, seizing and euthanizing these animals over claims of illegal possession and rabies risks. The operation involved multiple agents and hours of effort, showcasing a swift and decisive response to what many saw as a trivial violation. This incident, amplified by social media outrage, underscores how authorities can mobilize resources to "arrest" or address wildlife-related issues, even when the targets are harmless pets, while seemingly ignoring far graver human crimes.

In contrast, the Epstein case—despite overwhelming evidence of a sex trafficking operation involving influential figures—has seen remarkably little accountability for his clients. Epstein, a financier with ties to politicians, billionaires, and royalty, was arrested in 2019 and died in custody, officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories abound. Court documents unsealed in recent years name numerous associates, yet few, if any, of these high-profile individuals have faced arrest or prosecution. The disparity fuels public frustration: while a squirrel’s fate can prompt a government raid, the powerful men who allegedly exploited minors alongside Epstein remain largely untouchable, shielded by wealth, status, or legal loopholes. This juxtaposition paints a compelling picture of a system that prioritizes the enforcement of petty rules over the pursuit of justice for heinous crimes, leaving society to question where true accountability lies.

A thread on Epstein and his clients👇

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1895611012335763888

Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1895611012335763888

Read 52 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Mar 8

Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #31 for your awareness👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893768537480511621

Here’s a prev thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1893768537480511621

Read 25 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Mar 4

The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.

Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.

Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.

A thread on health and wellness👇