A bipartisan bill called the #RestrictAct has been proposed by Mark Warner of Virginia & John Thune of South Dakota, to protect national security and ending foreign adversaries. Apps like TikTok to be banned from misusing American consumer data or … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Are you a VPN user in USA… too bad #RestrictAct could get you decades in jail for using VPN 🤷♂️
The #RestrictAct gives sweeping powers to the secretary of commerce and the president (the executive branch) to take appropriate measures against people/products/services they deem threaten national security.
The powers that #RestrictAct gives over citizens and foreign nationals are unprecedented.
Civil violations can result in penalties up to $250,000 or twice the amount of transaction committed, whichever is greater.
The adversary elements in this bill are so vast, you might as well kiss your innovation goodbye in the USA. This might apply AI, ML, Quantum computing and even cryptography.
Blockchain & Crypto projects would be under the purview of this bill 😱
The #RestrictAct aids the American #Government in restricting citizens rights & liberties, turn itself into a totalitarian surveillance state just like China, which it’s trying to stop.
The #RestrictAct will morph America into China a totalitarian state.
The #RestrictAct is the #PatriotAct on steroids and you all know what powers and rights you lost with patriot act 🤷♂️
The #RestrictAct is not just limited to TikTok it’s much more than that
If #RestrictAct gets passed you might as well leave America, it’s that bad
#RestrictAct isn’t about banning TikTok, it’s controlling the entirety of your internet & digital presence
And who are the foreign adversaries. BTW this list isn’t complete, your executive branch can deem any individual or country or an entity an adversary at anytime 🤷♂️
You’ll be a complete clown puppet in the hands of your master & controller the #BigBrother after the #RestrictAct gets passed into law 🤷♂️
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
The RESTRICT ACT S 686 is a massive violation of our 4th Amendment Rights and a complete Nationalization of the internet.
Google Trends for #RESTRICTAct is at the highest levels. What does this mean -- lots of people of scared to see their freedoms erode away with this act.
The #RESTRICTAct isn’t about TikTok
The #RESTRICTAct is about your freedom & privacy on the internet
The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files reeks of hypocrisy and deliberate obfuscation, raising serious questions about their motives. Trump, along with Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, made bold promises to release the full scope of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, fueling public expectations of transparency. Instead, they delivered a curated batch of already public information to a select group of pro-Trump influencers, sidestepping broad disclosure. This move, cloaked as a step toward openness, was a performative stunt that betrayed the spirit of their pledge. The administration’s pivot to claiming no “client list” exists, after years of speculation they themselves amplified, feels like a convenient reversal to shut down further scrutiny. This pattern of overpromising and underdelivering suggests a calculated effort to control the narrative, possibly to shield influential figures—potentially including Trump himself—from damaging revelations.
The contradiction surrounding Epstein’s death further erodes trust in the administration’s account. For years, Trump allies and conservative voices, including those now in power, fueled conspiracy theories that Epstein was murdered, pointing to the reported failure of video cameras at the Manhattan jail where he died. Now, the same administration claims to have clear video evidence showing no one entered or exited Epstein’s cell, confirming his suicide. This abrupt shift from questioning the official narrative to endorsing it—without releasing the footage for public verification—smacks of opportunism. It’s plausible that the administration is leveraging this newfound “evidence” to tie up loose ends and discourage further investigation into Epstein’s network, which could implicate powerful individuals. The refusal to share this alleged video only deepens suspicions that the administration is more interested in closing the case than uncovering the truth.
The possibility that the Trump administration is compromised by Epstein-related evidence cannot be dismissed. Trump’s documented ties to Epstein, including multiple flights on his private jet and their shared social circles in the 1990s, place him uncomfortably close to the scandal. The administration’s reluctance to release unredacted files, coupled with the selective distribution of documents to loyalists, suggests they may be suppressing information that could expose Trump or his allies. By hyping the release of the files and then delivering a dud, they appease their base’s demand for action while ensuring no new, incriminating details surface. This bait-and-switch tactic, paired with their sudden insistence on a tidy suicide narrative, points to a deeper fear: that the Epstein files contain evidence that could politically or legally devastate the administration. The hypocrisy lies in their public posturing as truth-seekers while their actions betray a desperate need to keep certain truths buried.
Democrats are compromised by Epstein evidence
Republicans are compromised by same evidence
They’re just blaming each other for political points to get elected… as soon as they get elected, they claim there’s no client list, Epstein killed himself
Biden’s border policies leaned toward massive illegal immigration cloaked as humanitarianism to make USA a permanent blue state. Biden was aiming to reverse Trump’s hardline measures with a focus on legal pathways and reduced enforcement. He suspended the "Remain in Mexico" policy, ended family separations, and expanded parole programs, allowing more migrants to enter legally, such as through the CBP One app or humanitarian exemptions for specific nationalities. However, this shift led to record-high border crossings, with over 7 million encounters from 2021 to 2024, overwhelming border facilities and local communities. This lax approach enabled cartels to exploit vulnerabilities, increasing human trafficking and drug smuggling, notably fentanyl, which contributed to over 100,000 overdose deaths annually. Open borders also strained public safety, with unvetted migrants linked to isolated but high-profile crimes, eroding trust in federal oversight and fueling national security concerns.
Trump’s border strategy, by contrast, prioritized deterrence through aggressive enforcement and physical barriers. His "Remain in Mexico" policy forced asylum seekers to wait outside the U.S., while Title 42 rapidly expelled migrants, reducing illegal crossings to historic lows by 2020. The border wall, though incomplete, disrupted smuggling routes, and his zero-tolerance stance led to fewer unaccompanied minors at the border. These measures bolstered security by limiting unchecked migration and cartel influence, but they came at a cost: family separations sparked humanitarian outcry, and rapid expulsions bypassed asylum rights, potentially endangering vulnerable migrants. While Trump’s policies projected strength, deterring illegal entry and easing pressure on border resources, they risked alienating global allies and fostering a perception of cruelty, complicating America’s moral standing without fully resolving migration’s root causes.
There has never been a war in history where 80% of the country has been destroyed, 100% of the population displaced, and 50% of the deaths are children.
NO COUNTRY CAN MATCH THE MILITARY MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES 🇺🇸
The B-2 bomber just flew into Iran, struck 3 nuclear sites & returned — without even being detected. With 44 hours of continuous flight, 18,000+ km range, and a $2.1 billion price tag
The media and government often distort information about health and food, prioritizing profit and control over public well-being. Media outlets, driven by advertising revenue, frequently promote processed foods and fad diets while downplaying their risks. For instance, sugary cereals are marketed as "heart-healthy" due to added vitamins, despite their high sugar content contributing to obesity and diabetes. Similarly, government dietary guidelines have historically pushed low-fat diets, ignoring evidence that healthy fats, like those in avocados or nuts, are essential for brain and heart health. These guidelines often stem from lobbying by powerful food industries, like dairy or grain conglomerates, which influence policy to favor their products over nutrient-dense whole foods. This creates a cycle where misleading narratives shape public perception, leaving people confused about what’s truly healthy.
Beyond misinformation, the media and government sometimes suppress inconvenient truths to maintain economic or political stability. For example, during the rise of industrial farming, both entities championed pesticide-laden produce as safe and necessary to feed growing populations, despite early studies linking chemicals like DDT to cancer and environmental damage. Meanwhile, alternative health practices, like fasting or organic farming, are often dismissed as fringe or unscientific, even when evidence supports their benefits. The media amplifies these biases by sensationalizing stories that align with corporate or government agendas, such as vilifying raw milk while ignoring its potential benefits for gut health. This deliberate obfuscation erodes trust and keeps people dependent on a system that profits from chronic illness and confusion.