Sean Casten Profile picture
Mar 29 16 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The US economy is increasingly de-coupled from fossil fuels and the FF industry increasingly depends on exports. Which means propping up the FF sector - as the #PollutersOverPeople Act does - is increasingly at odds with with the interests of American energy consumers.
1. Here's US GDP growth. Note growth from ~$15T in 2010 to $23T in 2021 or ~50% growth. Image
(I'm only going to 2021 because the energy reporting data lags a bit, but bear with me)
2. US Natural gas consumption over the same 2010 - 2021 period is up just slightly over 25%. Only growing half as fast as GDP. Image
3. US Petroleum consumption is flat over the period. Was rising slowly, collapsed during COVID and hasn't recovered. Image
4. A big part of the reason for the flat oil sales in the United States is because people have figured out how to drive without buying gasoline. It's pretty awesome. Image
5. And coal consumption is DOWN roughly 40% over the same period. Image
6. As I noted in my speech, this is really great news. There was a debate for a long time about whether rising GDP = rising fossil fuel use = rising pollution. We are proving that we can decouple the two. Not fast enough, but it's happening.
7. And it is NOT because we're using less energy. It's because we've figured out how to meet our needs for light, warmth and mobility without fossil fuels. That is a BFD.
8. So why is the fossil fuel industry making so much money, even as they lose domestic market share? Because they're now strip mining the US for export. Look at the surge in US petroleum exports. Image
9. Here's the same chart for natural gas, which is growing even faster on a % basis. Image
10. IOW: the interests of the US fossil fuel industry are increasingly at odds with the interests of American energy consumers. The latter want cheap energy and are voting with their wallets to invest in solar, wind, efficiency, EVs, etc. The former want to export.
11. Moreover, since we are now net exporters of oil and gas, on the margin any additional Btu exported RAISES American energy prices. Because less domestic supply, all else equal = higher oil and gas price.
12. What the @HouseGOP has done then is to prioritize the interest of US energy exporters. Make it easier to permit wells, mines and export terminals so that we can ship more US fossil energy overseas and prop up an industry that can't otherwise compete domestically.
13. Look, there are very good reasons to oppose their bill purely on environmental grounds. I'd rather not live next to a strip mine after all. But the heck of it is, this is a pile of foolishness also on purely economic grounds. In every way, it puts #PollutersOverPeople.
14. Anyway, that's the data to support my floor speech. But if you'd rather just watch my soaring oratory without footnotes, do that here. Meantime, I'm getting ready to vote HELL no. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

Mar 31
The @HouseGOP #PollutersOverPeople act was an easy bill to say "no" to. But we still need to deploy massive amounts of clean energy at unprecedented scale. That's why @MikeLevin and I have introduced a consumer- and climate focused alternative: eenews.net/articles/house…
1. The GOP bill was focused solely on accelerating the export of US oil & gas. Other than the (misleading) title, it did nothing to help energy consumers. It would have raised prices, raised the deficit and accelerated global warming. Details here:
2. But as @JesseJenkins (and others) have pointed out, we aren't going to be able to meet our climate goals without building a lot more electric transmission. So we have to find ways to make permitting easier... for the RIGHT assets. Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 16
A few quick thoughts on the GOP energy bill that was released yesterday. Headline: it is entirely focused on energy suppliers and utterly silent on the needs of energy consumers. Brief thread:
1. First, here's one of many recent press stories about it. Follow the links, dig in if you want views other than mine. politico.com/newsletters/po…
2. Now my personal beef with the way that we talk about energy policy in the US. We consistently muddle upstream, midstream and downstream sectors. Both parties are guilty of this.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 13
This article and pictures help explain why I've been pushing so hard to get our financial regulators to understand climate as a systemic risk - and highlight the political challenges that come with that honesty. washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…
Coastal properties are not the only part of financial risk but they are visible and tangible and highlight the unique political challenges faced by elected officials who are on the losing end of that capital flight.
When capital markets remove in response to tech innovation (think: VHS --> DVD, DVD --> streaming) we don't shed a lot of tears protecting the economic losers. But when climate makes whole tracts bad economic investments you're confronted with people & communities.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 3
For the last year I've been saying that the truly unique feature of the economy since Biden was elected is that we are creating jobs faster than workers. So you can imagine how pleased I was to see this chart in the Fed's March Monetary Policy Report proving the point with data.
My gut tells me that employers and workers haven't quite internalized this new reality because all of our habits of mind were built in the prior framework when there were more workers than jobs.
For example, it's not coincidental that the surge in hourly wages tracks to the point when it became a worker's market. More jobs than workers = more labor negotiating power. BUT...
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
This is fascinating. Longer discussion tomorrow but immediate takeaways: (a) Clean energy transition is accelerating even though (b) supply chain issues hurt PV last year and (c) energy productivity fell for reasons that may be analytical artifacts. politico.com/f/?id=00000186…
Markets prefer the clean stuff. This, in a nutshell is why the retrograde elements of the @GOP are bashing ESG right now. Because the picked the wrong horse, and their horse is losing.
Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 2
Yesterday, I voted against the REIN IN Act - a bill that would have required an estimation of the inflationary impact of any Presidential executive order before implemented. The bill asks for something that is mathematically impossible and politically useless. Here's why:
1/ First, if you want more details on the bill see here: thehill.com/homenews/house…
2/ Second, inflation, in it's simplest framing is politically potent but even a cursory amount of digging makes the issues way more nuanced. That makes soundbite politics dangerous & is why I did a whole town hall on inflation last year. casten.house.gov/media/press-re…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(