This is based on lunar calendar - 9th day of Shukla Paksha in Chaitra month (Panguni)
Pushkar Bhatnagar, an IRS officer purchased the license for Planetarium Gold software in 1999 to scientifically date the Ramayana.
His results were shocking (1/9)
This method of employing software to date the Ramayana on the basis of astronomical references
mentioned in source text , was pioneering.
Valmiki's aim was not to plant evidences. His astronomical references are recorded incidentally, as ancillaries to the main subject: Sri Ram
Valmiki states the position of different planets with regards to zodiac constellations and nakshatras in Bala Kaanda 1/18/8-9 verses at the time of Ram's Birth.
This can be used to complete Ram's astrological chart.
When this data is plugged into the software, we get his DOB!
Keeping the location co-ordinates as Ayodhya (25°N 81°E), Planetarium Gold points to the following date as Ram's Birthday:
10th January, 5114 BCE , 12-1 PM
When this date based on solar calendar is converted to lunar calendar, it was the 9th day of Shukla Paksha in Chaitra.
Bharat was born the next day, 11th January 5114 BC, 6AM
Lakshman and Shatrughan were born on 12th January 5114 BC
4 brothers born on 3 consecutive days!
With this date as the fulcrum, the entire events of Ramayana can be corroborated based on further astronomical data (5/9)
When Dashrath wanted Ram to be king, Sun, Mars & Rahu had surrounded his nakshatra, citing generally unfavorable conditions for him.
Plug this data again & the software mentions 5 Jan 5089 BC as the date of Ram's exile (vanavaasa)
He was 25 years old, as mentioned by Valmiki
In Ram's 13th year of exile, he fought with Khar-Dushan. Valmiki mentions this date as Amavasya & it was a solar eclipse.
When plugged with this data, the software gives date as 7 Oct, 5077 BC with a solar eclipse visible from Panchavati (20°N 73°E) (7/9)
In Summary, a Timeline of Ramayana based on Astronomical Data:
10/1/5114 BCE – Rama Born at Ayodhya
5/1/5089 BCE – Rama, age 25, leaves Ayodhya for 14 year exile
7/10/5077 BCE – Rama, age 37, 13th year of exile, battles Kar-Dhushana in Panchavati
Is such a validation via software necessary for our epic?
Indeed, no evidence is needed to prove the existence of the embodiment of Dharma who lives in our hearts.
To the skeptics: Can so many events that match with astronomical data be just a coincidence?
This is a greatly simplified version of the study, those curious can read the full details in Pushkar Bhatnagar's book, "Dating the Era of Lord Ram", Rs.395 (paperback), Rs. 302 (Kindle)
"Check your privilege" is a favorite phrase thrown around by LW w0kes to silence their opponents.
Here's a short thread on why no sensible, decent person should fall for this psychological trap, and how to counter this manner of thinking using Indian sensibilities (1/8)
"Check your privilege" is basically a w0ke call for guilt-tripping you.
It is a polite way to shut you up by claiming moral high ground. They frame your life as easy, theirs as 0ppressed, and their "introspection" of their privileges (or lack of) as a license to silence you.
This thinking is comparable to the "original sin" doctrine - where being "privileged" (by their own definitions) is your sin.
You are made to feel guilt, shame and sorry simply for being born to a particular "privileged" group, by default. The sin was there for your taking, even before you were born.
You pay for this original sin by confessing your privileges and baptizing yourself into the sacred water of consent, in the presence of the holy victim spirit and pleading privilege guilty.
To understand the effectiveness of this endearing superhit film, you must first understand the psychology of "Identifiable Victim Effect"
You can learn more about yourself and how your brain works by watching this film. (1/8)
Our brains are wired to respond more strongly to individuals than to stats.
Which is why articles about the sufferings of poor families passes off as an abstract impersonal statistic but putting a name, face and story to a SINGLE suffering family makes it more relatable to us.
And Tourist Family does this brilliantly. The characterization is wonderfully designed to be humanized and likeable. Every single person in this film is a goody-good person.
You laugh with them, you cry with them, and you don't want anything bad happening to them.
When things you don't want to happen, happens, how do you respond?
Do you fatalistically blame it on destiny and accept it, or take initiative to overcome it?
What is the guiding principle in the fate vs free will debate?
What did Sri Rama do in such circumstances? (1/8)
In the epic's defining moment, Sri Rama who was about to be crowned as King, was instead sentenced to exile for 14 years.
Lakshmana was outraged by the injustice of this request, but Sri Rama calmly considered the exile as the will of destiny.
Kambar writes - "நதியின் பிழையன்று நறும்புனலின்மை; விதியின் பிழை"
"it is not the fault of river to dry up when rains fail. Similarly, Kaikeyi isn't at fault for fate's doing", says Sri Rama.
Here Lakshmana is for free-will, to not passively accept injustice, and to fight for the kingdom which was Sri Rama's right.
But Sri Rama defers to destiny and accepted the extraordinarily difficult situation that circumstances suddenly placed upon him and agreed to be exiled.
I've read Ponniyin Selvan cover to cover thrice, and this is my biggest takeaway from it.
It was a decision made by the hero Arulmozhi, inspired by his Suryavanshi ancestor Sri Rama. And it has a relevant lesson for all of us to learn in current political climate.
A🧵(1/8)
BG: Arulmozhi is the more popular prince among public, and they wanted him to be king, even when his elder brother was the crown prince.
This popularity constantly unsettles him, as he wants to do the right thing. And he wants to go beyond public opinion and shape it.
He is influenced by 2 tales - the sacrifices of Shiva he hears from priests at Thiruvarur Thyagaraja temple, and Ramayana.
Rama left for the forest at night when citizens were asleep & also informs his charioteer to take it along a circle so that they can't retrace his path.
2. "My dear Anna, shall I compare thee to Thiruvalluvar or to Marcus Aurelius?"
3. "Like Socrates was punished in ancient times, fake cases, imprisonment is the punishment of our times.
When they checked the pulse of A Raja during 2G case, it was normal. Infact it was the investigating officers who were pulsating with a rapid heartbeat!"
Sati was the most forceful issue created by the Evangelical-Utilitarian alliance to validate Brit rule in India.
The missionary-Brit nexus inflated the # of incidents to horrific levels for politics.
Cholas have documented Sati giving a much needed nuance to this topic (1/8)
The colonial term Sati to refer to this practice is incorrect . Sahagamana/anugamana is the right Indic term.
Anugamana was a rare and sporadic practice in ancient Thamizhagam.
Vaanavan Maadhevi (mother of Rajaraja) chose to do it after the passing of Sundara Chola.
There are several conditions for it to be permitted in Chola tradition:
1) the wife must be in perfect physical and mental health 2) it should be purely voluntary without external influences 3) the close family members must request her to reconsider until the final moment