Today, on #TransDayOfVisibility, I would urge you to follow @TranScribe_IRL and listen to the stories of Irish trans people dealing with our Irish trans healthcare system. (Recently ranked worst in the EU.) Raise up their voices. It's a national scandal no-one is talking about.
One of the most powerful campaigns during Repeal were the stories shared on the "In Her Shoes" page.
It was impossible to read those stories and not grasp the horrible human cost of our decade's-long abortion ban on ordinary people's lives.
This is no different.
Our abortion ban was a scandal that was underpinned by a lack of regard for women's bodily autonomy and a deep distrust for women.
This is no different.
This is a scandal underpinned by a lack of regard for trans poeple's bodily autonomy, and a deep distrust of trans people.
Just like women travelled then to get access to their basic human rights, trans people travel today, with all the same issues in regards to finances and aftercare, and just like those women were virtually invisible then, we aren't seeing trans people now.
I think there should be an independent public inquiry into how trans healthcare in Ireland has turned out to be the worst in the EU, that has, at the heart of it, the testimonies of trans people in the system.
For example, how did it happen that over 100 Irish trans people were on the wrong waiting list for years?
Hi @jenoconnell, while this article is appreciated, the IT has been complicit in making a victim of Rowling, not least @fotoole's article "How does defence of trans rights become search for women to blame?" which encouraged trans people to consider her feelings in this. 1/
At the same time, The Irish Times published a letter referring to trans women as "trans-identified males" and "porn-addled autogynephiles" and implied they were "violent misogynists."
This was deeply offensive to Irish trans people and those who know, love and support them.
This sort of language comes straight from the most transphobic parts of the internet, and should never, ever have made it on the pages of a paper of record.
Would such a digusting letter about any other minority have been published?
It's just perfect that the transphobes are now selling playing cards where they are portrayed as diamonds and hearts, and trans people and advocates are portrayed as clubs and spades.
Absolutely no notes, except to say, thank you.
The boys - Graham Linehan and Matt Walsh - are portrayed on their playing cards as being astride their steeds, but @jk_rowling is portrayed side saddle?!
99.99% of mass shootings in the U.S. in the last 5 years have been carried out by a cis person. And here's the thing about that: who gives a shit if the shooter is cis or trans?
This is a GUN problem. It's utterly disgusting to keeping shrugging at the slaughter of innocents.
Sandy Hook was the moment that I realised America was never going to fix this. I saw a centrist commentator argue that while it was tragic, they needed to keep *their* guns to go shooting with the kids on the weekend because it was a family tradition, and they were *good* people.
And now every mass shooting that comes around, with sickening regularity, is treated not like yet another avoidable tragedy, but a political cudgel by those with an agenda. "The shooter was a trans man. That'll be the testosterone they take. We need to stop them all doing that."
Did you ask any trans men about this before you tweeted about it?
I'm not trans, and you should be having these discussions, in private, with trans people, but, in my experience, most trans people appreciate trans inclusive language, which is probably why @aoc uses it.
Here's a page on testicular cancer that says "people with testicles." I am not at all offended that it doesn't say "men," and I don't see how it stops me getting cancer care. I happy for trans people that this page is thoughtful enough to include them.
I don't feel like this page reduces ME to my testicles by dint of me reading it.
Now, at the same time, I understand that the Right has reduced women to babycarrying vessels, and that is wrong, but abandoning trans inclusive language is not going to change that.
They all shove their successes in people's faces when they get criticised.
This is nothing to do with Left or Right politics, this is simply the privileged taunting the underprivileged.
This is why privileged people like this often hate Twitter: it is possible to have a relatively tiny account with a good point about privileged people, and for that point to go viral; to loosen the stranglehold the privileged have on the mainstream narrative.
Ana &Cenk have spoken for years about taking money out of politics, but, when it suits them, they will taunt others with their privilege. They will essentially say "look at the privilege we built, bitches, & you have the temerity to try to "correct" us? Who do you think you are?"
Claiming that women have never been oppressed is a pretty big deal, @Glinner, and yet you treat it like it's a tolerable, minor difference of opinion? It is literally the underpinning of feminism. You cannot accept allyship with a man who denies it and say you support feminism.
This is a prime example of the moral and intellectual vacuum at the heart of so-called "gender critical feminism." It's why I don't use "TERF" anymore and put "gender critical" in inverted commas. Actual feminism sees men who deny the oppression of women as the patriarchal enemy.
The only credible explanation for allying with men, like Peterson, who deny that women are even oppressed at all, or treating this denial as a minor quibble is that the movement you belong to is not a feminist one, that cares about at all about women's rights.