Weaponization of the justice system is not an impartial DOJ indicting a lifelong criminal.
Weaponization of the justice system is firing your AG because he refused to investigate your former political rival in an effort to fulfill your warped ‘campaign promise’ to “Lock her up”
Weaponization of the justice system is firing your own FBI director because he wouldn’t stop investigating an attack on our elections by a hostile foreign power that you were complicit in.
Weaponization of the justice system is having your DOJ secretly subpoena the data of two prominent Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell) in an effort to subvert Congressional investigations into your own crimes.
Weaponization of the justice system is trying to fire the Special Counsel who was hired in response to your firing the FBI director and tasked with investigating whether and to what extent you colluded with a hostile foreign power and obstructed justice.
Weaponization of the justice system is pressuring your first AG to fire the then-FBI director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein to obstruct investigations into your own crimes.
Weaponization of the justice system is requesting your DOJ to open an investigation into your 2020 opponent, Joe Biden.
Weaponization of the justice system is having your next AG whitewash the findings of the Robert Mueller’s investigation and lie to the American people.
Weaponization of the justice system is repeatedly applying pressure on the DOJ to take it easy on your allies facing legal pressure, which were ultimately successful in the cases of Michael Flynn and Roger Stone.
Weaponization of the justice system is having your Chief of Staff send emails to the DOJ in your final weeks in office in an attempt to get them to investigate baseless election fraud theories to lend legitimacy to your lies about a “stolen election” that you used to stage a coup
Weaponization of the justice department is using the DOJ to obtain the phone records of reporters who scrutinized you in an effort to obtain dirt of some kind on them in an act of completely illegal retribution.
Weaponization of the justice department is using the FBI and IRS to go after your political opponents or other perceived enemies.
It’s revoking security clearances of former top intelligence officials and press passes for reporters who were critical of you.
Weaponization of the justice system is attempting to extort the President of Ukraine into launching sham investigations into your future political opponent by withholding critical aid and then claiming immunity from prosecution on the basis of occupying the Presidency.
Weaponization of the justice system is having your acting Secretary of Defense prevent the deployment of the national guard to the U.S. Capitol for over three hours while you watched the deadly attack you incited based on a lie unfold on live TV from the WH.
Weaponization of the justice system is trying to get the Supreme Court (one third of which you appointed) to overturn the results of the 2020 election despite there being no evidence whatsoever to substantiate a single claim of fraud or malfeasance of any kind.
I could go on and on with this, but the bottom line is Trump spent every day of his time in office weaponizing the justice system. He wielded the power of the Presidency as a weapon against his political and other enemies and the DOJ as a shield to protect him from accountability
Republicans can whine all they want about how Bragg indicting Trump constitutes “the weaponization of the justice system.”
The fact is that:
1,) No, it doesn’t, and
2.) The guy you’re claiming is the victim of such weaponization did nothing but weaponize it himself for 4 years
And Trump is not alone in his weaponization of the justice system. The entire @GOP has done the exact same thing by packing SCOTUS and the lower courts with religious extremists to rip fundamental rights from women and restrict voting rights/access among people of color.
And there is perhaps no clearer example of weaponization of the justice system than the wife of a sitting Supreme Court Justice (Clarence Thomas) using her political power to try to overturn the results of an American election via deadly insurrection:
This motherfucking piece of shit wrote AN ENTIRE BOOK perpetuating a FALSE NARRATIVE about @JoeBiden that the @GOP MANUFACTURED to make Trump seem like the safer choice from a mental health perspective. FUCK OFF FOREVER @jaketapper.
.@jaketapper is not a psychologist and has no expertise in the mental health field. I am/do. And @JoeBiden did not—not during that godforsaken “debate” nor any other time—exhibit cognitive or physical decline that rendered him unfit for office. Therefore no cover up was possible.
@jaketapper @JoeBiden It is neither necessary nor possible to cover something up that does not exist. @Grok also confirms that @JoeBiden did not show any signs of severe cognitive decline or dementia in that “debate” and that he won it on truth/substance but lost it on optics (he looked/sounded bad).
No, I am not—nor will I *ever* be open to/interested in—“agreeing to disagree” with Trump supporters.
Here’s why, and why you shouldn’t either.
(THREAD)
If you still support Donald Trump, you and I do not “have a difference of opinion” or “different political views.”
We are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED and INEXORABLY INCOMPATIBLE in terms of morality, decency, character, intellect, compassion, integrity, sanity, clarity, and humanity.
Donald Trump is not “a politician I dislike/disagree with.”
He is a(n):
• 34x convicted felon
• Judge-and-jury-adjudicated rapist
• Traitor to America who incited an insurrection
• Puppet of Putin and global autocrats
• Open enemy of LGBTQ rights and democracy itself
It’s not funny at all. You want to know why the victims haven’t come forward? Because MOST OF THEM ARE DEAD/KILLED. You want to know why no police reports/investigations? Because Republican Ohio governor @MikeDeWine INSTRUCTS THE SHERIFFS IN OHIO VALLEY NOT TO FILE/SHRED THEM.
1. Whether you love me or hate me, I am not “some random twitter douche.” I am the most far-reaching political influencer on this platform. And I achieved that by putting out credible content every single day for the past 9 years straight
2. I made a pledge to all who followed me when I first started posting on here in 2017 that I would always engage with them, answer their questions, and NEVER LIE TO THEM. And I have KEPT THAT PLEDGE. I DO NOT SPREAD MISINFORMATION AND DESPISE PEOPLE WHO DO (like everyone you RT)
.@JDVance: It's been 1 week since you sent a "cease and desist" letter to me demanding that I delete the tweet in which I called you out for RAPING BOYS in the Ohio Valley in the mid-2000s (which you did). I told you to GET FUCKED. Where is the "swift and certain legal action"?
.@TheRabbitHole84 is correct that if you type this prompt into @grok, it says “Yes.”
However, it’s incorrect to say that this is the right answer. As a prolific reader and scholar of history, inequality, psychology, sociology, and the origins of social hierarchy, I know this one
Here’s how I led @grok to the right answer:
1. I responded to its wrong answer of “Yes” with:
“That is incorrect”
@grok .@Grok responded:
“I respect your view. My stance is that Affirmative Action can be seen as racist because it involves treating individuals differently based on race, often prioritizing certain groups over others in opportunities like education or employment.”
.@JDVance just had a local constable deliver a “cease and desist” letter about the tweet below from someone named “Chris Ashby,” who interestingly does not appear to even represent the @VP. It threatens to pursue “swift and certain legal action” against me if I don’t delete this.
I will neither be ceasing nor desisting. Nor will I be deleting the tweet. Because nothing in it is false and you cannot win a defamation case against someone who posted a true statement against you. I left a message for Chris at his law firm letting him know to contact me.