Background; knowledge of immunity and virology would indicate that the more a virus replicated, the more chance of mutations and variant selection.
Immunity would reduce replication and selection time.
What did the authors find?
"In unvaccinated individuals, variant of Concern (VOC) Alpha, Delta, and Omicron respiratory samples were found to have higher within-host diversity and were under neutral to purifying selection at the full genome level compared to non-VOC SARS-CoV-2."
"Breakthrough infections in 2-dose or 3-dose Comirnaty and CoronaVac vaccinated individuals did not increase levels of non-synonymous mutations and did not change the direction of selection pressure."
"Vaccine-induced antibody or T cell responses did not appear to have significant impact on within-host SARS-CoV-2 sequence diversification."
In other words; this indicates that the unvaccinated (and those with reduced immunity) made a greater contribution to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants then those vaccinated (stronger immunity).
Severe hepatitis outbreak in children linked to AAV2 virus
More than 1,000 cases of childhood hepatitis with no known cause have been reported. The discovery of AAV2 in the blood and livers of such children might provide an explanation.
In 2022, a group of “independent journalists” was invited by Euroasia, an organisation founded by the Russian political scientist Alexander Dugin. This fits a pattern where far right actors are recruited, directly or indirectly, to undermine the media and perception of reality
These actors are there to criticize the so called “mainstream media” and use alternative news channels, websites, blogs, social media such as Facebook and twitter, and publications such as weekly magazines, often targeting women.
The actors recruited may even be critical themselves of far right movements. The media they write in, however, often play critical roles in aiding and spreading the beliefs of far right movements and personalities.
Professor Clancy responds to TGA document
Dr. John Campbell
This is toe-curling to watch! From someone who promote HCQ and IVM, maybe to be expected. But, the amount of misinformation is staggering! This is highly inappropriate from both!
Everything gets brought up. “gene therapy”, biodistribution that is all over the body, and the mouse study using a tolerance protocol, to claiming Treg/Tsuppressor cells, IL-10 and limited antibody production. All is horribly wrong.
Regarding the tolerance protocol used in mice; this I wrote earlier, the blog is here:
Immunity debt, or gap, it was a thing. It could be that some endemic infections, after a bit of time with less exposure, we could have somewhat reduced protection against. It could. But did it materialise?
Not in NL (griep = flu)
Influenza A was late in 2020/2021, but was certainly present. 2022/2023 was early, that is all.
This is in line with people needing health centre/ GP care.
IgG4 responses have been reported with other vaccines including that of the tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccine and the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Different isotypes have different roles in immunity. Not necessarily worse.
It is however clear that not all is known about IgG4 and its consequences. The clinical data of protection after vaccination, do argue for good protection: with an important role for T cells as well as antibodies.
"Het benoemen van domheid is een enorm taboe in NL, alsof je door iets ‘dom’ te noemen per definitie iets zegt over iemands intelligentie. Merkwaardig, want niet alleen een mens kan dom zijn, een gedraging, redenering, politieke beweging of >>
>> televisieprogramma kan dat óók zijn. Domheid kan bovendien tijdelijk en te verhelpen zijn."
Een "opzettelijke cultivering van onwetendheid". Maar je mag het schijnbaar niet benoemen, dat is "schelden" volgens sommigen.
Ondanks een berg aan bewijs van het tegenovergestelde door experts, mag je schijnbaar toch blijven beweren dat het anders is. Anders omdat je dat "voelt" of "gelooft". En deze tegenstrijdigheid met realiteit is dan schijnbaar niet "dom".