1. Alternatives to Gain of Function Research
Loss of Function Research
Molecular dynamical modeling of viral proteins
Interactions with inhibitors and receptor
In vitro studies of specific properties required for human adaptation using single proteins archive.ph/Lzwxz
2. More Alternatives
In vitro studies of genetic interactions between loci in viral proteins using replication-incompetent viruses – epistatic interactions
Sequence database comparisons of genetic properties of human and animal adapted viruses
All proposals & progress reports discussing dangerous virus experiments & documents related to the planning of the experiments
Details as to when, where & why such experiments were planned including any review processes involved
Risks & Benefits
8. Question of Biowarfare Research
It is now clear (to me) that the US, despite its denials, has pursued an illegal biowarfare program, by outsourcing collection of deadly viruses around the world & making them more virulent & pathogenetic.
We now have all the evidence we need
9. Public Denials, Ongoing Research.
Of course, The US Government and the Scientists involved will never state that they are engaged in biowarfare research, but rather "biodefense" and the noble drive to develop vaccines and prophylactics for deadly viruses & bacterial diseases.
10. The New Mantra: "Protecting the War Fighter"
Bio-Defense Now:
56 Suggestions for Immediate Improvements Final Report 85% Biological Defense Project (2005)
US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program to protect the US “warfighter”
by reverse engineering dangerous SARS-like bat viruses and creating aerosol vaccine sprays for use in bat caves
of more controversial elements of US cold war biowarfare projects (well documented), e.g. aerosolisation of pathogens & their respective delivery programs, as they know exactly how to do all this
Now there is a wider repertoire of offensive weapons
13. Extent of Pentagon Biowarfare Program?
Pentagon linked researchers like Lipkin (Mailman) Nichol (Atlanta) Baric (UNC) Bavari, Totura (USAMRIID), Denison, Munster (Rocky Mountain) & DARPA, DTRA, PREDICT Scientists involved could tell us a great deal!
We need to find out why Peter Daszak & EcoHealth had In-Q-Tel backing and why Nathan Wolfe (an obvious intelligence asset with links to Epstein/Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, and Bill Gates) was on their editorial board.
🧵My comments and some conclusions regarding the EHA documents we found:
1. Peter Daszak actively schemed to foil congressional and other investigations into EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) and its ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as revealed in the DRASTIC document stash.
2⃣ He orchestrated a “Coalition of Support” with former USAID officials like Dennis Carroll and NGOs like the Smithsonian, which sent letters (e.g., April 24, 2020, to NIH) decrying grant cuts as political attacks to deflect scrutiny (Part 6, p.35-36).
3⃣ Daszak hired the Kyle House Group (KHG) to lobby against NDAA defunding amendments, with KHG’s Porter joining meetings like one on August 4, 2023, with Rep. Adam Smith’s staff to kill Sen. Joni Ernst’s provisions (Part 7, p.52).
Baric's hACE2 transgenic mice were shared with the WIV for GOF like virus experiments designed to "assess" the potential for coronaviruses to jump from animals to humans.
2. Baric spills his humanized mice beans to Father Racaniello during a heart rending TWIV confessional in March 2020, admitting he sent his hACE2 mice to WIV in 2018 (as part of the infamous NIAID grant mentioned above):
"Our R01 work shows that bats in South China harbor many SARSr-CoVs (50+), some of which are able to use human ACE2 to enter human cells, infecting humanized mouse models to cause SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines"