1. Alternatives to Gain of Function Research
Loss of Function Research
Molecular dynamical modeling of viral proteins
Interactions with inhibitors and receptor
In vitro studies of specific properties required for human adaptation using single proteins archive.ph/Lzwxz
2. More Alternatives
In vitro studies of genetic interactions between loci in viral proteins using replication-incompetent viruses – epistatic interactions
Sequence database comparisons of genetic properties of human and animal adapted viruses
All proposals & progress reports discussing dangerous virus experiments & documents related to the planning of the experiments
Details as to when, where & why such experiments were planned including any review processes involved
Risks & Benefits
8. Question of Biowarfare Research
It is now clear (to me) that the US, despite its denials, has pursued an illegal biowarfare program, by outsourcing collection of deadly viruses around the world & making them more virulent & pathogenetic.
We now have all the evidence we need
9. Public Denials, Ongoing Research.
Of course, The US Government and the Scientists involved will never state that they are engaged in biowarfare research, but rather "biodefense" and the noble drive to develop vaccines and prophylactics for deadly viruses & bacterial diseases.
10. The New Mantra: "Protecting the War Fighter"
Bio-Defense Now:
56 Suggestions for Immediate Improvements Final Report 85% Biological Defense Project (2005)
US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program to protect the US “warfighter”
by reverse engineering dangerous SARS-like bat viruses and creating aerosol vaccine sprays for use in bat caves
of more controversial elements of US cold war biowarfare projects (well documented), e.g. aerosolisation of pathogens & their respective delivery programs, as they know exactly how to do all this
Now there is a wider repertoire of offensive weapons
13. Extent of Pentagon Biowarfare Program?
Pentagon linked researchers like Lipkin (Mailman) Nichol (Atlanta) Baric (UNC) Bavari, Totura (USAMRIID), Denison, Munster (Rocky Mountain) & DARPA, DTRA, PREDICT Scientists involved could tell us a great deal!
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)
page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site