1. Alternatives to Gain of Function Research
Loss of Function Research
Molecular dynamical modeling of viral proteins
Interactions with inhibitors and receptor
In vitro studies of specific properties required for human adaptation using single proteins archive.ph/Lzwxz
2. More Alternatives
In vitro studies of genetic interactions between loci in viral proteins using replication-incompetent viruses – epistatic interactions
Sequence database comparisons of genetic properties of human and animal adapted viruses
All proposals & progress reports discussing dangerous virus experiments & documents related to the planning of the experiments
Details as to when, where & why such experiments were planned including any review processes involved
Risks & Benefits
8. Question of Biowarfare Research
It is now clear (to me) that the US, despite its denials, has pursued an illegal biowarfare program, by outsourcing collection of deadly viruses around the world & making them more virulent & pathogenetic.
We now have all the evidence we need
9. Public Denials, Ongoing Research.
Of course, The US Government and the Scientists involved will never state that they are engaged in biowarfare research, but rather "biodefense" and the noble drive to develop vaccines and prophylactics for deadly viruses & bacterial diseases.
10. The New Mantra: "Protecting the War Fighter"
Bio-Defense Now:
56 Suggestions for Immediate Improvements Final Report 85% Biological Defense Project (2005)
US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program to protect the US “warfighter”
by reverse engineering dangerous SARS-like bat viruses and creating aerosol vaccine sprays for use in bat caves
of more controversial elements of US cold war biowarfare projects (well documented), e.g. aerosolisation of pathogens & their respective delivery programs, as they know exactly how to do all this
Now there is a wider repertoire of offensive weapons
13. Extent of Pentagon Biowarfare Program?
Pentagon linked researchers like Lipkin (Mailman) Nichol (Atlanta) Baric (UNC) Bavari, Totura (USAMRIID), Denison, Munster (Rocky Mountain) & DARPA, DTRA, PREDICT Scientists involved could tell us a great deal!
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.