Thread by @FreeStateWill

In my latest J6 case filing, I dissected the new sworn declaration from USCP Counsel Thomas DiBiase. He claims Republicans in Congress now have access to 41,057 hours of CCTV. However, his statement indicates Capitol Police are withholding thousands of hours of CCTV from… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

I also point out the DiBiase has declared that it was the FBI, not Capitol Police that first requested the protective order on USCP CCTV, which prevents defendants from having full access, and keeps it from being seen by the American people.

There are also many conflicting statements between DiBiase's first sworn declaration (3/17/21) and his second (3/16/23). The biggest is that DiBiase has shrunk the more than 14,000 hours of CCTV (from J6 noon to 8 p.m.) that he originally swore to, down to 12,671 hours.

The two DiBiase declarations indicate that committees seeking access to the CCTV have received different numbers of hours for the 8-hour time frame between noon and 8 p.m.

The current House Admin committee received fewer hours than the same committee in the previous Congress.

DiBiase declared the J6 committee and current house admin committee also did not received CCTV for the full 24-hour period from January 6. However, in his previous declaration he swears other committees in the last Congress did.

It gets worse.

Even if there are only 12,671 hours of CCTV from noon to 8 p.m. on J6, the government has produced less than half of that to J6 defendants in discovery.

The government has failed to produce the equivalent of at least 840 cameras and 280 days of CCTV video.

The government has magically discovered 13 news cameras in the 14k hours of CCTV Capitol Police gave them two years ago, but claiming "we recently identified" it is disingenuous. One of those cameras was recently used on Tucker, and another in the 2021 Impeachment hearings.

I also argue that defendants need CCTV from all times and cameras on January 6. This is especially true because an individual dressed like protestors was wandering the first floor of the Capitol minutes before Dominic Pezzola broke the first window.

My filing closes by urging the court to take a full inventory of Capitol Police CCTV possessed by the DOJ.

Earlier in my filing, I addressed the government's hypocritical whining regarding my use of First Amendment rights outside the court.

I pointed out that the government's coordinated information campaign against January 6 defendants has far exceeded my own public statements.

I also touched on my pending motion to release the police provocateur video, the recent leaks, and the governments false allegations that those videos are not relevant to my case.

"I will need to call these undercover officers as witnesses to authenticate all video they recorded… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

I pointed out the government does not know the evidence well enough to know what is relevant to my case, which is further reason for me to have access. I note the government falsely claimed in my indictment that Kamala Harris was in the Capitol despite video showing otherwise.

Bodycam from MPD Officer Richard Carter titled "Escort Harris to DNC" shows him driving his patrol vehicle to escort the Harris motorcade from the Capitol to the DNC at 11:21 a.m. on January 6.

This is included as Exhibit 95-2 in my motion.