🧵 A comparison of the differing approaches pro-choice and pro-life advocates take to supporting women.
It's a response to the common abortion stereotype that pro-lifers don't care about women or their born children, often used to avoid real conversation.
Pro-life advocates promote loving support for mothers and their families. They are included and important members of our society. Strong families build strong communities.
Here is a sample of the network of support the pro-life community continues to build. It is made possible through volunteers and donors dedicated to the wellbeing of women and their families.
(I apologize for the disorganization of the long list.)
Abortion advocates offer networks to facilitate killing a woman's youngest child within her uterus & a return to her circumstances.
They offer a consistent message that some children are better off aborted & many women are better off avoiding motherhood. Abortion is cheaper.
That messaging extends to minors below the age of consent. In this thread abortion advocates promote abortion to minors without mentioning the risks, without assistance in holding abusers accountable, & without support for abuse related trauma.
Here is one of many examples of abortion ideology enabling work spaces to require abortion for participation rather than accommodate female bodies in those work spaces.
Here abortion advocacy promotes abortion as an economic tool. It's cheaper than providing support. This common expression of abortion ideology usually targets & coerces poor women, even if it is dressed up in more compassionate language.
Here, abortion advocates in the medical community encourage abortion for children with disabilities rather than spending that time offering education & resources to parents.
This mother was offered abortion due to Down Syndrome two days before delivery.
This is a depressing commentary on the lies young women are sold to benefit the abortion industry. They are taught to fear their bodies, their future children, and that success isn't an option without abortion. 😥
I don't know who was interviewed or how the questions were asked, but this indicates a pervasive concern.
It's not just young women. Young men have been taught to expect their partner to abort an unwanted child (and if he doesn't want the child he likely believes she doesn't either).
THREAD: Abortion is marketed to minors before they can consent to sex without acknowledgement of the risks and without support for reporting their abuse.
This Amaze video was included in school curriculum material for 10 - 13 yr olds. It is about medical abortions & self-managed abortions with websites to get the pills. They don't give info on the risks. Again it's aimed at girls below the age of consent.
This video describes how adults transport minor students for abortions without their parents' knowledge. No mention of assessing for rape or abuse to extend mental health or legal support. Abortion is their only concern.
THREAD: Is the abortion pill "safe and effective"? That depends on how you define the terms. They are definitely more dangerous for the mother than early surgical abortions. More information below.
The United States does not require abortion clinics to collect safety data, so we do not have coherent information to base safety decisions on.
Some states report no abortion information to the CDC. For the states that do report information, there is a wide variance in what is reported and how complete that information is.
It is repeatedly claimed that abortion pills via telemedicine are "safe and effective" in support of the FDA's decision to remove an in-person appointment requirement.
What evidence did the FDA use to make that decision?
In an April 12, 2021 letter to Drs. Phipps and Grobman, the FDA pointed to four studies to support their change in policy allowing abortion pills to be prescribed without an in-person visit.
Kerestes et al. (2021) studied medical abortions in Hawaii. Of 327 patients, 110 were seen in person, with two requiring an ER visit and one requiring additional misoprostol (Kerestes et al., 2021).