His book is 100% nonsense. Scientific evidence is compelling that manmade #ClimateChange is modest and benign, and CO2 emissions are highly beneficial, as Arrhenius predicted.
NONE of the significant predicted harms from global warming are real.
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks 7/21」There is only ONE major climate change which is actually happening, due to carbon emissions. NASA measures it, from satellites:
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks 9/21」That's especially beneficial for the world's most vulnerable people, who live in arid regions, like the Sahel, where agriculture is difficult, and famines used to be frequent.
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks@newscientist 12/21」None of the supposed major negative impacts of elevated CO2 are actually happening, to a detectable degree. But higher CO2 levels are extremely beneficial for the Earth's ecosystems, especially in arid regions:
"Vast swaths of North Africa are getting noticeably lusher due to warming temperatures, new satellite images show, suggesting a possible boon for people living in the driest part of the continent."
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks@newscientist@NatGeo 16/21」In addition to benefiting natural ecosystems, elevated CO2 is extremely beneficial for agriculture. It makes agriculture more productive, and less vulnerable to droughts. That improves global food security, saves lives, and lowers food prices.
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks@newscientist@NatGeo 18/21」Not only does CO2 make crops more productive & food more plentiful, through "CO2 fertilization," thus freeing land from agricultural use for reforestation, it also helps avert famines by mitigating drought impacts.
@1Objectivist@dwallacewells@TimDugganBooks@newscientist@NatGeo 20/21」All of the information I've given you is backed up by robust scientific evidence. It is very good news, which SHOULD come as a great relief to Mr. Wallace-Wells. But it won't, because he perversely LIKES that feeling of impending doom.
@nidhi123413@NBCNews 1/23」The reason so few conservatives fret about #ClimateChange is that the best scientific evidence shows that manmade warming is modest & benign, and CO2 emissions are net beneficial, rather than harmful. Learn more here: co2coalition.org
@nidhi123413@NBCNews 2/23」If you didn't know that, it means you're not getting balanced or accurate information. Climate change is a highly politicized topic, so, as for any politicized topic, if you want to understand it you need information from BOTH sides of the debate.
@nidhi123413@NBCNews 3/23」Scientists (except for climate industry shills!) call the periods of warmest climate "climate optimums," because they're objectively BETTER than cold periods. That includes periods much warmer than now.
@pjholloway I have very good news for you, Paul: David Wallace-Wells @dwallacewells's book is 100% nonsense. The scientific evidence is compelling that manmade #ClimateChange is modest and benign, and CO2 emissions are highly beneficial, just as Arrhenius predicted.
As Andrew mentioned, the chart you shared proves vaccination saves lives. Most anti-vaxers can't understand that, due to innumeracy. But that's not why I'm sure most anti-vaxers are innumerate.
Vaccination greatly reduces risk of death from Covid-19, yet most elderly who die of Covid-19 were vaccinated. Do you understand why those 2 facts are perfectly consistent?
If you do, then you should also understand Andrew's point.
That's incorrect. It has nothing to do with climate change.
@JamesPasley1@SundayStarTimes 2/8》NC's Outer Banks are barrier islands, made of sand, which have ALWAYS moved around, through dynamic processes that are pretty well understood.
If your house is on the wrong side of one of those moving islands, you have a problem. But it's not a climate problem.
@JamesPasley1@SundayStarTimes 3/8》Here's a classic 1965 educational film from Encyclopedia Britannica Films and the American Geological Institute, courtesy of the LSU Center for GeoInformatics, which explains it:
The predictions of early GCMs can be compared against reality, but they failed miserably. I wrote this about the most famous of them: sealevel.info/hansen1988_ret…
1/11》Democrats are soooo gullible! This Ben Barnes fairy tale is obvious Democrat disinformation.
Barnes, now 85yo, is a lifelong Democrat wheeler-dealer, and close associate of John Kerry. He's a protégé of President Lyndon Johnson (one of the dirtiest Texas politicians).
2/11》I'm sure Victor Shi & the other leftists touting this wouldn't believe a far-fetched story by a lifelong Republican politician, smearing a Democratic President. So why do they believe a far-fetched story by a lifelong Democrat politician, smearing a Republican President?
3/11》Barnes's story makes no sense. He now claims that in 1980 he met with "Arab" leaders, and asked them to ask the Iranians to not release the hostages before Election Day, because if they waited then Reagan would offer them a better deal. But: