In today's #vatniksoup, I'll introduce a German lobbyist, lawyer(!) and former politician, Gerhard Schröder. He's best-known for being the chancellor of Germany, for being BFF's with Putin, and for lobbying for Nord Stream AG, Rosneft and Gazprom.
1/22
Schröder worked as a lawyer between 1976 and 1990 before he moved to full-time politics. His most famous and controversial case was in 1980 when he helped Horst Mahler of the Baader-Meinhof terrorist group to be released early from prison.
2/22
Mahler then returned back to practicing law with the help of Schröder. In Apr 2017, Mahler was again sentenced to prison for 3½ years.
Gerhard joined the Social Democratic Party in 1963. Then comes the decades of boring politics and policy stuff, power struggles inside...
3/22
...and outside the party, the whole circus. Then, in 2005 his party lost the 2005 federal election, after which Schröder showed his true colors. The election was extremely tight, but CDU's Angela Merkel finally took the chancellor position and on 23 Nov 2005, Schröder...
4/22
...resigned his Bundestag seat. Only a few days after this, Gerhard joined the board of directors of the joint venture for the Nord Stream - it was time to make some (dirty) money!
But Schröder's bromance with Putin had started years before, and in Jun 2000, the NYT...
5/22
...reported on the warm relationship of these two "brothers from another mother" extensively. They had met four times in a span of three days, and Putin jokingly commented on their relationship: "What do you want us to say - that we're in love?".
6/22
He then continued: "Germany is Russia's leading partner in Europe and the world". Schröder stated that he and his wife had accepted an invitation to spend the Christmas with the Putins.
This also marked the beginning of close economic relations between Germany and...
7/22
...Russia - the same relations that bit Germany up the arse after Russia's full-scale invasion. These meeting also took place two months after Russia had capitulated Chechnya, ending the 2nd Chechen War.
8/22
In 2004 he called Putin a "flawless democrat". Few days later Putin congratulated his puppet leader Viktor Yanukovych for winning the Ukrainian presidential elections. Few months prior the Russians had allegedly poisoned Yanukovych's opponent, Viktor Yushchenko.
9/22
Gerhard visited Russia five times while in office, but he wasn't close with just Russia: he also visited China six times. He was one of the few who pressured the EU lift their arms embargo on China.
In 2007, when Estonia removed a Soviet-era war memorial from Tallinn...
10/22
...& Russia conducted a devastating cyberattack on Estonian infrastructure,Gerhard came & defended the Kremlin perspective. He claimed that Estonia had contradicted "every form of civilised behaviour", referring to the 🇪🇪 efforts to remove a statue of their former oppressor.11/22
In 2008, during the South-Ossetia War, Schröder laid the blame solely on Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili and "the West", hinting that they provoked the war.
He likened the annexation of Crimea to NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, stating that both cases violated...
12/22
...the international law and the UN charter. He said that Putin had justifiable "fears about being encircled", referring to the age-old "NATO expansion" trope. Schröder celebrated his 70th birthday with Putin in St. Petersburg a month after the annexation.
13/22
In his memoirs, Schröder wrote that "It would be wrong to place excessive demands on Russia when it comes to the rate of domestic political reform and democratic development, ...
14/22
...or to judge it solely on the basis of the Chechnya conflict", basically saying that we should let Russia continue their genocidal imperialism as long as they keep sending him money.
15/22
Schröder's involvement in Nord Stream AG was criticized by many, including his political opposition and the countries over whose territory these gas pipes would be built. US Democrat Tom Lantos went as far as calling Gerhard a "political prostitute".
16/22
In 2009 Schröder increased involvement in Russian dirty money by joining the board of a British-Russian joint venture TNK-BP. In 2016 he became the Manager of Nord Stream 2, an expansion of the first pipeline, solely owned by Russian Gazprom.
17/22
In 2017, Russia nominated him to serve as an independent director of Russian Rosneft. During the nomination, Rosneft was under Western sanctions over the Ukraine conflict. But for Gerhard this didn't matter, as the gig paid 350 000 USD annually.
But wait, that's not all!
18/22
In 2022, three weeks before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Schröder was invited to the board of directors of Gazprom. During this time he was heavily criticized by both national and international press.
19/22
He didn't believe that Russia would invade Ukraine, calling it Western "saber rattling". By this time, he was receiving nearly 1 million USD annually from Russian energy companies.
20/22
To conclude: Schröder and his pals Heino Wiese and a former Stasi-agent and Putin confidant, Matthias Warnig, have been involved in dirty Russian energy deals since the early 2000s, without showing a hint of remorse.
21/22
In Gerhard's own words: “Why should I apologize?”
To honor Putin and the "traditional family values" he so often refers to, Gerhard has been married only five times.
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5
In this first (and maybe last?) Basiji Soup, we’ll look at… the Islamic Republic of Iran, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, how it sells its atrocities as virtue and its repression as morality, how it serves the Kremlin, and the current protests against it.
1/20
Basijis are members of the most fanatical part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In a broader sense: Iranian regime loyalists & propagandists. They may be fewer than vatniks or wumaos, but the goal is the same: destabilize the West to protect a brutal regime.
2/20
The regime oppressing Iran is a “theocratic” authoritarian state around a “Supreme Leader” hiding behind religion to justify its crimes: censorship, repression, executions, torture and terror — similar to Russia and its “holy war” against Ukraine.