1/ Lots of people are spreading this misinformation about the role ethnicity has played in the grooming gang scandal. This is the biggest race hate scandal in 21st century Britain so we need to get it right. Thread…
2/ The claim that ethnicity played a role was first raised by Times journalist Andrew Norfolk in 2011, when he found a pattern of Pakistani ethnic abusers and white victims in 17 cases. Nick Clegg and the chief executive of Barnado's both backed calls for a major investigation.
3/ The authorities were worried by the race angle. In 2008 the Human Trafficking Centre commissioned a film about the dangers of on-street grooming. But three years after being made, it still wasn't shown in schools, apparently because they were "scared" of the subject matter.
4/ Following revelations by Andrew Norfolk in The Times about the scale of the abuse in Rotherham, social worker Alexis Jay was commissioned to investigate the issue. Her 2014 report found, at a conservative estimate, at least 1,400 victims from 1997-2013.
5/ The Jay Report found that the majority of perpetrators were described as Asian by their victims but that the council had failed to address that, with some staff worried about discussing ethnicity for fear of being seen as racist, while others were told explicitly not to.
6/ Only around 2-3% of the population of Rotherham during the period examined by the Jay Report came from a Pakistani ethnic background. Most abusers of the 1,400 girls therefore came from a population of only around 8,000 people. Clearly they were hugely over-represented.
7/ Following the Jay Report, the government commissioned an investigation of Rotherham Council by Louise Casey. It found that political correctness had prevented the council dealing with the abuse. A social worker said that statistics on ethnicity were taken out of presentations.
8/ The Casey Report also found that the majority of abusers were of Pakistani ethnicity and the majority of victims were white. This was "a matter of fact". The Council was scared of mentioning ethnicity and confronting that there was "a race issue here".
9/ This over-representation of Pakistani ethnicity abusers targeting white girls wasn't exclusive to Rotherham. The Telford Inquiry released last year found the town had at least 1,000 victims and that this figure might be "tame".
10/ The Telford Inquiry also found that, like in Rotherham, efforts to discuss the nature of the abuse were shut down with accusations that it was racist. Claims of racism helped prevent effective action and led to the abuse being allowed to carry on.
11/ Once again, the Telford Inquiry found that the majority of CSE suspects were "men of Southern Asian heritage", despite the Asian population of the town only being 4.7% in 2011. Just as in Rotherham, the predominantly Pakistani Asian community were over-represented as abusers.
12/ To find out if this over-representation was true, a Home Office Report was commissioned and then published in 2020. It supposedly found that the majority of abusers were white men - a line which is trotted out whenever Pakistani ethnicity over-representation is mentioned.
13/ But what the Home Office report actually found was that data was so poor that nobody knew for sure. Rather than try to actually find out, they limply pointed out that a majority of abusers were white. But of course that’s the case, Britain is a majority white country!
14/ Going all the way back to Andrew Norfolk in The Times, the contention had always been that those of Pakistani heritage were over-represented as abusers, not the majority of abusers. And the research cited by the Home Office Report actually agreed with that.
15/ The Asian population of Britain in 2001 was 5% and in 2011 it was 7.8%. The studies summarised by the Home Office Report showed Asians made up:
- CEOP (2011): 28%
- Berelowitz (2012): 27%
- CEOP (2013): 75%
- Berelowitz (2015): 14%
16/ During the research for my film “Grooming Gangs: Britain's Shame” I came across a new research paper which showed that people of Muslim and especially Pakistani heritage were significantly over-represented in group based localised child sexual exploitation.
17/ By comparing the number of prosecutions to the overall population, the NCA-cited study showed that 1 in every 2,200 Muslim men over 16 in England and Wales had been prosecuted for this crime from 1997 to 2017.
18/ When it came to Pakistanis, rates of prosecution across England and Wales for this kind of abuse was 1 in 1,700.
In Rochdale, 1 in 280 Muslim males over 16 were prosecuted.
In Telford, it was 1 in 126.
In Rotherham, 1 in 73.
19/ There is still more research to be done, but the Home Office Report doesn't disprove that those of Pakistani ethnicity are over-represented. And those who claim saying so is racist are repeating what led to the scandal being hidden for so many years. Justice requires truth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Britain’s grooming gangs scandal is attracting attention. It’s happened before, but now it seems different.
I’ve dedicated most of my career in journalism to covering it. Because it’s the most appalling atrocity in modern British history.
In this thread, I’ll tell you what I know about the crisis, what I’ve uncovered, and what is yet to be revealed…
When did it start?
Reports of gangs of men abusing children via on-street grooming go back as far as the 1970s.
But it first came to major prominence after Labour MP Ann Cryer raised concerns about the targeting of young girls by “Asian men” outside school gates.
It was 2003. She was accused of racism by many in her own party and had to install a panic alarm. Cryer was vilified for trying to support girls facing appalling abuse by predominantly Pakistani men. She was the first to endure this treatment, but by no means the last.
Then a year later in 2004 came 'Edge of the City,' a Channel 4 documentary about social workers in Bradford.
Hours before transmission it was yanked from the schedules.
Unite Against Fascism, The 1990 Trust, and the National Assembly Against Racism lobbied Channel 4 to drop it, as did the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire.
The local elections were coming up. And the film captured grooming gangs for the first time. South Asian men abusing teenage white girls. They were worried that the BNP, who were making a lot of noise about the abuse gangs, would profit.
So it was canned. Another opportunity to discuss children as young as 11 being gang raped was missed.
I understand that Oldham Council will now attempt to launch a Telford-style inquiry and that its officers are contact with the people who carried out the town’s inquiry.
But a survivor from the town told me that a government inquiry is the only way to secure proper justice.
Tommy Robinson has admitted two contempt of court claims by repeating false allegations against a Syrian schoolboy, who successfully sued him in 2021.
Robinson smiled towards his supporters in the public gallery as he entered the dock in a grey suit at Woolwich Crown Court.
The judge told the court that he had watched the “Silenced” film that contains the allegations, which remains on Tommy Robinson’s X feed and has some 55 million views.
The barrister for the solicitor general said the film had been republished widely, including by Andrew Tate.
The judge said it is in Tommy Robinson's interest to cover all of the contempt counts at once, so as to prevent separate penalties.
The maximum sentence is two years imprisonment, which the Crown's barrister said is "to punish but also to ensure compliance and to rehabilitate."