There’s no compelling need for this law. There are plenty of state & federal laws that cover damage to infrastructure.
As we’ve seen with the GA cop city protestors, these DT laws can be readily abused to harass, jail, & stigmatize activists for political purposes.
Bill sponsors assure advocates that this is not GA, so we shouldn’t worry about abuse.
This is especially dangerous idea as we know about entanglement of law enforcement with right-wing extremists. We know who is most likely to be targeted using these laws.
Also, the bill’s current language leaves room for accusations of “terrorism” or “attempted terrorism” for alleged property damage during protests.
“Terrorism” is a grave term that should not be applied lightly to vandalism, whether intentional or reckless.
Anyway, this is dangerous stuff. Please raise your voice about this bill to your state electeds.
Here’s an action alert the ACLU of Oregon put together that makes it easy.
Today, I’m going to draw attention to 2 bills at the OR legislature that could be used on social, racial, & environmental justice activists: HB 2572 & 2772.
As a long time activist who has directly experienced law enforcement overreach, I'm concerned.
The bill sponsors are trying to solve a real problem: violent, right-wing extremism.
But the process to craft the laws has been limited & the main contributors are prosecutors, law enforcement, & an academic who worked at the NSA.
Few critical & community voices are involved.
These bills assume the main barrier to curtailing the dangerous activities of right-wing extremists is a lack of authority, but the reality & deep structural problem is that a disturbing # of law enforcement officials participate in, protect, & coordinate w right-wing extremists.
Portlanders want to reverse the damage caused by turning much of the North riverfront into a sacrifice zone & reduce the chance of horrible industrial catastrophe.
The City of Portland, by contrast, is doubling down on industrial polluter dominance & helping greenwash it.
They want us to “move forward” from their disastrous Zenith decision that places Portlanders in harms way. They picked a lying fossil fuel corporation over human safety & are acting like it’s some little disagreement that we can all just pretend didn’t happen.
Can’t we all just agree to disagree on this teeny weeny little issue of *whether to expose residents to the risks of an oil train disaster*?