I didn't get a chance to tweet the PCE price & other data on Friday (too busy with carbon taxes!). Sharing data now.
Core PCE inflation came in below expectations and below recent trends.
But is volatile, overall has moved sideways.
Underlying inflation remains about 4.5%...
...Here are 8 different measures of inflation for 4 different periods. I'm adjusting to PCE-equivalent (mostly matters for core services ex housing and median which run higher on average).
Ignoring volatile 1 month, these range from 3.4% to 5.3% with a median of 4.5%.
Notably, swapping in indices for new rent for the lagged all rent in the official data is making a smaller difference lately.
The 3-month annualized inflation rate with new rent indices is 4.0%, only slightly below the 4.2% for official core.
An alternative way to handle housing is simply to exclude it. This reproduces the "supercore" concept by excluding housing and used cars. Like core it has also moved sideways--and is consistent with inflation in the mid-4's.
This is the measure the Fed has been focused on, which is core services excluding housing. Like most everything else it improved in February, but like most everything else smoothed over longer periods it has been moving sideways--and is consistent with 4%+ inflation.
A lot of good empirical reasons to believe the median or trimmed mean are the best measures of core inflation, is telling us more like high 4s than low 4s.
Overall, the PCE price data tell a consistent story (more consistent than the story from the CPI, because housing matters less in the PCE).
No big reason in the price data itself to expect that to change--but external data on growth and wages suggest some possibility of slowing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will be enthusiastically supporting faculty legislation to cap the number of A's at Harvard at 20% (plus a bit). The collective action problem that has driven grades higher & higher over time is increasingly problematic. I hope other institutions consider similar steps.
I've talked to numerous colleagues & students about grade inflation. Almost all of them see it as a a problem. I've also heard about as many different ideas for solutions as I've had conversations. I would tweak this proposal in various ways. But would support it over nothing.
One place the current system fails--and it's not the only place--is honors. I'm on the Committee to recommend honors in the economics department. It's increasingly hard to distinguish excellence with so many A's. I believe that now even two A-'s makes you ineligible for Summa.
Depending on how you look at it growth in Q3 was very very strong or very strong or just possibly merely strong. Annual rates:
GDP: 4.3%
Real final sales to domestic purchasers: 2.9%
Average of GDP & GDI: 3.4%
GDI: 2.4%
A big part of the story was consumer spending up at a 3.5% annual rate. Started the year looking weak but new data and revisions have made consumers very strong.
Business fixed investment a bit weaker but also very heterogenous. Equipment investment and IPP up but non-residential structures down for the seventh straight quarter.
Several thoughts on that piece by @nealemahoney & @BharatRamamurti in @nytopinion.
1. They claim price controls are good politically. I'm very open to this being true, I'm under no illusion that what I think is good policy is particularly well correlated with good politics. But I am genuinely interested in more evidence beyond the brief observations they make.
2. They claim that even if you think price controls are a bad idea they can help you pass supply-increasing legislation that is on balance good. Once again, I'm open to this. And in government I've often done 3rd, 7th or 12th best policies because of constraints.