From what I hear, this is the jury charge for @realDonaldTrump’s indictment. New York PL § 175.10, FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE 1ST DEGREE.
INTENT is an element, which is why they need @MichaelCohen212. This is the felony charge which…
…requires, as another element, that it was done to cover up a crime. PL § 175.05 is 2nd degree & a misdemeanor, lacking that second element.
The attempt to elevate it to a Class E Felony, is solely to get around the statute of limitations clock which, Bragg will argue,…
…tolled when Trump was out of state. I can provide the case law he’ll use to make this argument. A biased judge can let the indictment stand.
Appeals, if he’s convicted, would be another matter. Bragg’s entire case will rest on Trump covering up a campaign finance crime which
the FEC said didn’t happen. Between that, & the timing, appeals are a no brainer, as in NY, the state constitution guarantees a speedy trial, & federally, it’s a clear cut 6th amendment argument.
I don’t think Trump is in any peril. It’s a joke of a case & a political hit job…
…as is obvious to everyone, even CNN! It won’t hold up. But they’re betting everything on it, and I’ll want revenge. Pendulums bruh.
They’re not trying to get him to win the nomination with this. They really do want to prevent him from ever running. That’s obvious. I know…
… a lot of very smart conservatives say this is a play to get him the nomination so they can beat him. It’s not.
They’re using this, Georgia’s laughingstock, & the special counsel over classified docs, to try to kneecap him. That’s obvious by now. It’s not a play. They’re…
… actually this evil. They actually are trying to use a corrupt justice system to eliminate and imprison a political opponent and opposition leader. This is incomprehensibly bad and they don’t fear the other half of the country.
Only if we turn it around on them, will they.
Here is some of the case law in NY that Bragg will use to defeat statute of limitations, which is 5 yrs. He has to argue that the clock tolled when Trump was out of state. There is some precedent, but this is unique.
Misdemeanor was 2 years. Hence the elevation to felony.
If Bragg is ballsy & @Isikoff was given wrong info or the language was off, he could try NY PL § 175.35, or OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE. Jury charge below.
This is a Class D felony but it’s OFFERING instead of just FALSIFYING. Highly unlikely.
Bragg MUST prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump had the intent to cover up a crime. Mens rea is a required element.
Unless new evidence came up, @MichaelCohen212, admitted perjurer & liar, may be the only witness for such a claim. Even a NYC jury may laugh at that!
Question: Can any of these cases stop Trump?
No. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. POTUS must be:
- Natural born citizen
- 35 yrs old
- Resident for 14 yrs
SCOTUS bars congress from adding requirements, like a clean criminal record. He could run from jail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Omg I could argue this better! Bruen is the controlling standard on the presumption of constitutionality!
YES NO FUNCTIONAL HANDGUN IN COMMON USE CAN BE BANNED! COME ON!
If you’re not listening to oral arguments you have no idea what I’m talking about. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
MA has an approved firearm roster for handguns. All handguns not approved are banned (besides private sale). Heller allows for potentially dangerous guns to be restricted. But they’re not dangerous and unusual if they’re in common use throughout other states.
Now the state is going to argue it’s not a ban, but regulation because it doesn’t impact individual rights to carry a firearm, since we can buy them privately. Essentially retail stores can’t sell them, but private sales can. That’s nonsensical.
I can’t believe how brainwashed people are on Ukraine. It’s really nuts. You guys know it’s possible to simultaneously believe Putin is a dictator and shouldn’t have gone into Ukraine, while also recognizing it not our fight and we largely caused it, right?
Ukraine has murdered an unarmed woman and now an unarmed man in public bombings in Russia. That’s a terrorist attack and war crime to assassinate a non-combatant.
And nobody thinks that’s probably not good? Because the victims talked smack about Ukraine on TV and blogs? Wtf is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
So these people would also agree with the statement that “9/11 was just part of war. If the US didn’t attack muslim countries, it wouldn’t have happened!”